I think you have this backwards a bit. Your procedure from 12.2.3 seems fine but.... OMF's are normally governed by drift but they will be compatible with the deflection of the CMU shear walls. The challenge will be to get the OMF's to resist any meaning full load because the shear walls are not...
I always just think about a point load on the rafter of 200#. If the rafter cant support that then something feels wrong. I have only ever invoked the 2.5' sq area in a very specialized floor case.
Sounds like it comes down to the hinge hysteretic settings and p-delta. The moment-curvature settings for the hinges need to be well thought out and be determined based on good seismic detailing practices.
NLTHA is a finicky beast and if your not extremely confident in your settings and good at...
When you say wind controlled I assume you mean that the base shear due to wind is greater than the seismic base shear. That does not alleviate the need for seismic detailing.
You must ensure seismic detailing is performed at least to the level required based on seismic design category, and...
You could use a dual system or a horizontal combination system. I don't see special masonry walls combined with omfs in the dual systems section of Table 12.2-1
I can't really think of a specific reference document that covers your case.
You have to use your judgement, and for lateral I feel you are on the right track.
You cant expect a moment frame to take any load away from the existing CMU walls because of relative stiffness.
So you are left with...
where is human909? Im curious to see what they would say to OP.
@duckhawk, remember that stiffness 'attracts' load. But also that ultimate limit states can aid our design process.
Sure the connection exhibits some moment stiffness as others have indicated, but as you keep increasing that...
In this equation its the 'projected' area. Meaning you project the surface area to a single plan. My read is that there are no windward and leeward components to account for when using it.
Your second question is more interesting. You could treat it like wall that is open to atmosphere and compare.
If resisting seismic loading in SDC D or above, I think this would be difficult using prescriptive design per AISC.
Do the beams in your diagram represent floor levels ?
The type and ductility of this frame needs to be addressed if SDC D or above. That is a pretty significant hurdle.
1802.1 just says that allowable pressures shall be used with allowable stress design load combos.
Though I haven't yet had a geotech provide ultimate values, there is precedent for using them for foundation at least in ASCE7-22 12.13.5. Granted this section is in reference to seismic loading...
Also your model has slip at one end and I would be looking to detail it that way or investigate the consequences of locking it in.
I like the idea of a simple shear tab on the top chord and potentially another shear tab at the bottom chord perhaps with slotted holes.
The slab needs to serve the role of drag strut collector. Some assessment of the tension and compression capacity of the slab as a strut/tie needs to be performed. There are different approaches used, some add supplemental reinforcement while others use the slab distributed reinforcement over a...
It is odd that you are saying gravity loads cause lateral deflections. The only reasons I can think of that that would happen are if you have a lot of P-delta or If your lateral system supports dead load (thrust typically from non-vertical gravity load resisting elements).
First I think you...