Yes, you are right. The design is new and unexplored. This is a controversial decision, the question is to what extent the benefits of using the proposed mechanism outweigh its weaknesses. That is why I posted here, hoping for comments from experts.
Thanks to several adequate forum participants...
In the end, I propose a mechanism that doubles the crank speed with the same stroke of the working slider. A longer piston stroke allows for more complete use of the fuel consumed and the use of fuel with a lower combustion rate. This mechanism also allows for an increase in the maximum possible...
As far as I understand, the main complaint about the design is that the horizontal slider will exert impact loads on the vertical slider during movement and destroy its guide. The vertical slider and its guide in the diagram play an auxiliary role. They are not affected by the fuel being burned...
If it does not get stuck when moving, why should it get stuck when stopping and moving further? When the sliders move strictly in a certain direction, the crank has no other options except to rotate in a certain direction under the action of inertia. I have given options for passing the "dead"...
Thanks for the detailed analysis!
Passing the dead point is a standard problem of the internal combustion engine. It is solved by using flywheels, using several cylinders, the dead points of which are separated into different positions of the output shaft.
If we imagine that the mechanism is...
I will try to answer specific questions if the answer has not already been given in the comments above. Comments like "this will never work, because if it worked, it would have been used long ago" or unsubstantiated accusations and insults I will leave unanswered. I hope that on an engineering...
First you accused me of fraud, now you say that my patent is too vague. I received patents in different countries legally. It turns out that now you accuse the patent offices that issued me patents of negligence. I act strictly within the legal framework. I believe that my invention is useful...
I use repeated definitions to ensure that the wording is correct and justified, and that there are no reasons to accuse me of providing false information and misleading people. In principle, everything is stated in the invention patent. The assumption about the possibilities of its use is based...
To create a prototype engine based on the proposed mechanism and perform a detailed analysis of its characteristics, it is necessary to involve specialists in this field, use special programs and technological equipment. This is the level of a specialized laboratory. I do not have such...
Thank you for your comment and the attached diagrams!
I imagine it roughly as it is shown in the attached diagram. The extension element is attached to the piston inside the combustion chamber.
I think that this is a solvable problem one way or another.
1. Yes, I know what a P-V diagram is. For simplicity, let's assume that the thermodynamic process is the same as in a conventional ICE with the same combustion chamber dimensions.
2. I didn't write about that. You are trying to find an increase in energy that cannot exist according to the law of...
You present confusing arguments, hiding behind facts known to you, ignoring logic. Point by point:
1. My invention has achieved a clear effect - a twofold acceleration of crank revolutions per stroke of the outermost slider in the chain without using gear transmissions. This is a fact.
2. The...
By long wavelength I meant long relative to gamma radiation and X-ray radiation.
The power of an electromagnetic wave, in addition to frequency, also depends on the power of the transmitter. Currently, there are technologies for providing high power electromagnetic waves, such as lasers.
In the proposed mechanism, the piston speed will be lower to ensure the same rotation speed, and when using fuel with lower flammability, the temperature in the combustion chamber will be lower, which can reduce friction losses in the piston group.
The piston in the diagram is a horizontal...
The proposed idea is unique and can be used or not. All my actions are legally transparent and your examples are incorrect at the very least. I do not engage in extortion and do not force anyone to use my patents. I only answer questions. You have switched to insults, so I am ending the dialogue...