Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

Register Log in
  • Congratulations TugboatEng on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Recent content by rrmiv

  1. rrmiv

    Post Tensioning as a Deferred Submittal

    Does anyone know of a standard or guideline regarding the relationship of the EOR to the P/T designer? Does PTI or ACI address this anywhere such as a "Code of Standard Practice", describing the responsibilities of all parties?
  2. rrmiv

    f'm vs. grout strength

    miecz, I'm not so sure about your statement that f'm is unrelated to the grout strength. If the unit strength method is used (typical for my firm), then you are correct. As long as all the criteria is met regarding masonry unit strength, bed joint thickness, and grout and mortar proportions...
  3. rrmiv

    Horizontal Irregularity 1a (ASCE7-05)

    I see your point that it doesn't amplify much in Section 12.8.4.3. But the other reference sections of Table 12.3-1 come into play also, such as the Increase in Forces and for higher Occupancy Categories whether Equivalent Lateral Force is allowed (Table 12.6-1).
  4. rrmiv

    f'm vs. grout strength

    The way I understand it is you either: 1) specify that the grout must meet the proportions of ASTM C476; or 2) specify the compressive strength. You shouldn't do both. If you choose the latter, you must test it. Tests must be in accordance with C1019 (4 blocks with paper). We have...
  5. rrmiv

    f'm vs. grout strength

    Did you specify that the grout must be tested? If so, was the grout tested in accordance with ASTM C1019? If some other method was used, the results are probably not valid if the mold does not match the absorption rate of the masonry units. We typically do not require grout compression tests...
  6. rrmiv

    Horizontal Irregularity 1a (ASCE7-05)

    JoshPlum, thanks for the reply. It isn't perfectly symmetrical, but close. And yes, the 5% accidental eccentricity is applied. My point is that when the magnitude of the drift is very small, there does not have to be much difference from one corner to the other to exceed the 1.2 limit. As...
  7. rrmiv

    Horizontal Irregularity 1a (ASCE7-05)

    Anyone have thoughts on this?
  8. rrmiv

    Reinforcement of CMU Wall (after the fact)

    When you say "in order to bring it up to Code" do you mean for strength or for seismic detailing requirements? If the former, we have added interior steel girts (CMU spanning vertically) or pilasters (CMU walls spanning horizontally between pilasters). If the latter, we have heard of...
  9. rrmiv

    Horizontal Irregularity 1a (ASCE7-05)

    Does anyone know of an exception based on the magnitude of the story drift? I have a two-story building with special concentric braced frames relatively symmetrical, seismic design category D. When I calculate the Torsional Irregularity, I am outside of the 1.2 limit, but the seismic drifts...
  10. rrmiv

    Concrete Footing Size "Rule of Thumb"?

    I noticed that also, assuming it was poor wording. What say you, kk88818? Please clarify.
  11. rrmiv

    Wood studs composite with sheathing?

    Thanks to all for the input. I am very skeptical of the composite approach also. Just wanted to check whether there is an accepted procedure for this that I didn't know about.
  12. rrmiv

    Concrete Footing Size "Rule of Thumb"?

    DavidStructural08, perhaps I misunderstood your initial response, but I think the original question from kk88818 was about direct uplift, not uplift due to a lateral element.
  13. rrmiv

    Concrete Footing Size "Rule of Thumb"?

    DavidStructural08, I'm not sure what you mean. The tributary area getting to a column footing would be the same for DL or uplift. One thing that must be considered though is vertical, downward DL vs. "real DL" used to resist uplift. You may choose to use a heavier DL for the gravity design...
  14. rrmiv

    Wood studs composite with sheathing?

    DaveAtkins, good point about the discontinuity of the sheathing. If we were able to determine that no joints occur in the sheathing though, do you know of an established procedure? Have one of the wood organizations addressed this?
  15. rrmiv

    Wood studs composite with sheathing?

    I have been asked to review an existing wood-framed building. My client wants to look at the wall studs as composite with the exterior OSB sheathing. I have never analyzed a wood-framed wall in this way and have a few concerns. One is the shear stress transfer to ensure composite action...
See more

Part and Inventory Search

Back
Top