Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Recent content by JohnWk

  1. JohnWk

    Why and Why not show Non-load bearing walls in structural plans?

    @Greenalleycat the contractor need to setout from the architectural drawings anyway, duplicate info in the structural drawings might cause issues with coordination and put the wrong details, the contractor can be confused of why the wall in the structural drawings if it doesn't have structural...
  2. JohnWk

    Why and Why not show Non-load bearing walls in structural plans?

    Concrete mix, connection to top , bottom and other details are in the standard details and general notes sheets, but why to show them in the structural plans as they are in the Architectural drawings? UPDATE(4 OCT 2024): those walls are usually block or facade precast concrete walls which are...
  3. JohnWk

    Ignore a new clause in the recent code

    I want to ask two questions, legalization related. I think it is important to know for any structural engineer 1- I'm using the recent code to design but I want to ignore specific clause which is new and 99% of the structures in the country did not design for it. Is it legal to do that ? if yes...
  4. JohnWk

    AS 1170.4 Clause 1.1 - Building with a Period Greater than 5s

    For The 1170.4 clause 1.1 . I would still use the standard as higher period will cause less Earthquake force , so use 5s rather than a higher value is conservative. For 1170.2. that 5sec limits is for wind serviceability and human comfort conditions , you should ask for wind tunnel study but...

Part and Inventory Search