did it, deleted the areas and charged the beam with a distributed load and the same ocurred, also isolated the load case to dead only and happened the same.
will continue testing
thanks for the quick response
also ive tested in another model with a single supported beam with the same combination and the result are the same with no real difference so its extrange. will continue digging in to find whats wrong on the model.
with this result im discarding program error, beam end distances, live load...
dear agent666
i have played with the live load reduction factors on the design panel but there wasnt any major changes on the deflection result
i will follow your advice and isolate de loads because my idea is to determinate why the program behaves that way.
i know that the correct value is...
dear mronlinetutor
discounting the end distances of the beam it really doesnt make much difference of the values, for example. this beam is connected to a beam IPE200 and a IPE240 so i will have to discount from 6,8 meters to 6,58/360 = 1,83 vs 1,56 design value.
therefore i dont think this is...
when you refer to pure analysis D+L what do you mean? because i selected the same combination D+L as design combo so it shouldnt be any differences. also in this case its a complete steel structure with no shrinkage or composite elements.
thanks for the reply, here is uploaded the model so you can check better what could ocurr.
Best regards.https://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=f6551c0d-e395-4612-a485-34a836afbf86&file=Structure.sdb
as far as i know there are two methods in sap2000 to see deflection on beams. Trough moment diagram 3-3 or in the design panel activating consider deflection in design.
the thing is both values differ from each other and dont know why.
wish someone can clarify this and tell me wich one is...
