Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations MintJulep on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
human909's latest activity
-
human909 replied to the thread Beam Reinforcement Calculation.👋 BAretired No need to apologise, now I'll take the blame for continuing the discussion. ;) It is nuanced because the VQ/I is an...
-
-
BA - I think there may be some confusion about the Q term here. The way I see it the areas you show in the photo for the Q term would be...
-
human909 replied to the thread Beam Reinforcement Calculation.Apology accepted. We are all human, and get frustrated when others don't seem to listen to what we think are well expressed arguments...
-
human909 replied to the thread Beam Reinforcement Calculation.BAretired you really should be more professional in your discussion on this topic. I appreciate your engagement but I haven't...
-
-
human909 replied to the thread Beam Reinforcement Calculation.Good question. The side plate goes along for the ride by providing sufficient fixings to transfer the vertical load. This could be...
-
human909 replied to the thread Beam Reinforcement Calculation.I agree with this 100% this approach to the calculation IF we were trying to calculate the shear requirements of fixing that top T to...
-
-
human909 replied to the thread Beam Reinforcement Calculation.Exactly. I have modelled it and it doesn't matter where the fasteners are located they are only transferring vertical shear. This is...
-
human909 replied to the thread Beam Reinforcement Calculation.I think you missed my point, yes it will be sistering. And you won't get 'composite' behaviour. But in this case the difference...
-
human909 replied to the thread Beam Reinforcement Calculation.A sincere thanks to continue to engage BAretired. While I continue to disagree, I appreciate a healthy discussion. Where is above...
-
human909 replied to the thread Beam Reinforcement Calculation.BA for reasons known only to yourself your are choosing to ignore half of the beam. The vector below the neutral axis is negative and...
-
-
human909 replied to the thread Beam Reinforcement Calculation.The strength of the connection, weld or otherwise, required to transfer shear force longitudinal to the beam is ZERO as described by...
-
human909 replied to the thread Beam Reinforcement Calculation.It relates because it shows the shear flow between the plates and the beam which is exactly the original question. It shows no...
-
human909 replied to the thread Beam Reinforcement Calculation.For those who like to see visuals and let computers do the work. Here is my representation of a beam with plates under UDL. I have an...
-
-
human909 replied to the thread Beam Reinforcement Calculation.Well that is stating the obvious. Since we are being pedantic I should have said there is not longitudinal shear flow BETWEEN the...
-
human909 replied to the thread Beam Reinforcement Calculation.Why do you assert this when it goes against the theory and shear flow formula and the previously explained points? The section will...
