Omega nought = 2 for inverted pendulum structures is listed in the table. I do not agree with your assessment.
Preventing a brittle failure mode to enforce ductility in a very non-redundant structure is basically the reason the concept of overstrength exists. IMO overstrength is required for...
Yes there are buildings with precast components all over the place in seismic design category C. Are they constructed exactly as you are used to...probably not. Will your methods, detailing and maybe type of LFRS be different than what you are used to....probably so.
Not sure what information...
It goes to the adjacent diaphragm provided you edge nail thru the sill plate and thru floor shtg. The missing information from the poster is where are the lateral elements (shear walls) below relative to this truss.
I'd agree fighting is no good. However, pushing back on time consuming but insignificant comments, is another issue entirely, particularly if it's a jurisdiction you submit to frequently. The plan checkers personal preferences shouldn't dictate your design or submittal.
I frequently do this...
The "step" is just a shear wall. Resolve overturning and provide boundary elements. At the red line, use a coil strap over 2x flat blkg. At the blue line the wall sill plate over 2x flat blocking can be your boundary element. Some of this depends on where your lateral lines below are...
Tell him, "Pages 1 through 12 are numbered as shown. Provide code reference requiring index or approve as is."
That being said even for my short calc package template I have an index.
It sounds like you answered your own question. It's better for the work point to be at the center all the members.
It will also allow your (I'm assuming) plywood gussets to be more size efficient to get the required nailing.
I've used it. Unless you specify that the framing is to be shored (jacked up) prior to installation the channels will only begin deflecting under any new dead load and live load.
Generally, I've just designed these as back-to-back channels, though I have went the transformed section route for...
This doesn't seem like a great idea but if you want to proceed you need to follow the load path. Check the wall for the existing loads plus the new additional out of plane moment, check top of wall connections for the out of plane loading, design plate to wall connections and of course design...
That is not a dual system. That's something you've made up.
A dual system has discrete shear walls or braced frames combined with discrete moment frames both acting in the same direction but in separate locations in the building. They are not some combined Frankenstein frame.
I'd recommend...