Shouldn't be a huge leap to group all the failures that are likely to occur in a collision, assume they might all occur simultaneously in such an event and mitigate accordingly.
Things like this should be captured by basic certification rules. FFS all the fine detail that has to be ticked for lighting, glass, vehicle dynamics, crash-testing . . . And now it appears that being able to open the door in an emergency is a feature that will have to be tested in the courts.
Its an interesting exercise and its great if that is the reason you are doing this. OTOH if you are designing this yourself because you think it is the best way forward, you need a reality check. The sensible route is to talk to a cam specialist and find a stock profile that can be adapted to...
The crankshaft in your posted image has 4 pistons at TDC every 90 degrees of rotation. This will only permit simultaneous firing with a pair of cylinders firing together. If you wand regular individual firing you will need to put a 45 deg twist halfway along the crank.
Interesting post but not data. Makers have always had recalls - even back when the consequences of not having a recall were far less serious than now.
Cars are far more effective, complex and tightly toleranced than ever before yet reliability is (probably) higher.
If you want heat energy there are all sorts of things you can burn or react. Pretty confident there aren't any that haven't already been considered and rejected.
I have always wondered whether sudden droop-limiting by the shock or external droop limiter causes undesirable handling anomalies during (eg) at-the-limit cornering plus bumps. One solution would be to secure the spring to its seats so it goes into tension during large droop excursions.
Don't know this device specifically but I think the following information would be helpful.
". . . . subjected to high-frequency vibrations" - Is this a pure sine wave of known, fixed frequency?
Bandwidth (data rate) to 3,200 Hz not what I would call high-frequency. Is your test frequency...