Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Recent content by FSB01

  1. FSB01

    Vessel drafting: 2D vs. 3D

    I have used both 2d and 3d design for pressure vessel. My personal choice would be 3d. However I would not recommend it to every pressure vessel fabricator. Advantages of 3d: - mistakes are reduced as designer is working with model, and each part is “assembled” into model same way as it will be...
  2. FSB01

    Thickness of Blind plate for Hydrotest

    I was asking myself same question, then I see that pipe thickness is given. If you calculate MAWP of the pipe you can get an idea of blind plate thickness. But that is just an idea, and I would not recommend anybody anything based on that. As domed head might seem as a better solution, flat...
  3. FSB01

    Sec VIII Div 1 calculation formula

    Thank you all. I will try to get some of those books (some of them I have) and see if I can find the answer.
  4. FSB01

    Sec VIII Div 1 calculation formula

    Shouldn’t internal pressure always act on the inner wall of a vessel? My conclusion is that the Code formulas are using Rm: For circ stress: Rm=Ri+0.6t Rm=Ro-0.4t For longitudinal stress: Rm=Ri-0.4t Rm=Ro-1.4t Why?
  5. FSB01

    Sec VIII Div 1 calculation formula

    Yes, it is the same question. I didn’t see a definite answer. It is not a job interview and I am working in pressure vessel industry for some time. I did number of calculations and never questioned why formulas are different. I just took them for granted.
  6. FSB01

    Sec VIII Div 1 calculation formula

    Hello, I have a question regarding a shell calculation. Why is code using different formulas if it is outside or inside diameter? If long. stress formula is Sl=P*Rm/2t, why is code using P*(Ri-0.4*t)/2*E*t. Or if Circ Stress is Sc=P*Rm/t why it is used P*(Ri+0.6t)/E*t Why is, for the...
  7. FSB01

    ASME Section VIII vs ASME Section IX

    Section VIII is rules for pressure vessel design. Section IX is welding qualification. When you build pressure vessel per Section VIII by welding, you are using Section IX for welding qualification.
  8. FSB01

    Pressure vessel shell calculation

    Thank you Tom, it is clear that those formulas are coming to same result. The reason for my question is that I will be interviewed soon and this is the type of the question that I anticipate. My interest is in the relation of the code formulas to the stress theory.
  9. FSB01

    Pressure vessel shell calculation

    I am not sure if that is the root for the formulas. I think that is the base for Division 2 calculations (maximum shear theory). My approach is that (for circ. stress) Rm is neutral line diameter of the shell. In that case Rm=Ri+0.6t would mean that that line is 60% inside of the thickness...
  10. FSB01

    Pressure vessel shell calculation

    I think that I have posted it on "boiler and Pressure Vessel" forum, haven’t I? This is only theoretical question, as where are those expressions coming from? I am working with ASME Section VIII for some time and I was not able to find an answer, yet.
  11. FSB01

    Pressure vessel shell calculation

    I have a question regarding a shell calculation. Why is code using different formulas if it is outside or inside diameter? If long. stress formula is Sl=P*Rm/2t, why is code using P*(Ri-0.4*t)/2*E*t. Or if Circ Stress is Sc=P*Rm/t why it is used P*(Ri+0.6t)/E*t Why is, for the longitudinal...
  12. FSB01

    self reinforced nozzle

    Thanks for the input. My problem is not as simple. I have multiple openings on flat head (b 16.5 blind flange) with LWN flanges. Minimum distance is 3/16” less than required by UG 36 (2.5*(d1 +d2)). As UG 36 is mentioning unreinforced opening (it maybe worded differently, I do not have code at...
  13. FSB01

    self reinforced nozzle

    Is LWN flange self reinforced nozzle? If it is, is there any reference in the code? Thank you
  14. FSB01

    HEAT TREATMENT PER UHA-44

    Well, it is UHA 44 Table. Design temperature range listed in the table is above 580°C. My design temp. is quite lower. Is there some other reference for cold forming of SS 304?
  15. FSB01

    HEAT TREATMENT PER UHA-44

    We have a 3/4" thk plate that we are rolling to 16" OD. material is SS 304. Per UHA 44 and strain is about 5%, and UHA 44 table is listing 304 material to be good up to 20% of strain. Everything looks OK, however, my problem is design temperature of 250°C. UHA-44 table is referring to...

Part and Inventory Search