Eng-Tips is the largest forum for Engineering Professionals on the Internet.

Members share and learn making Eng-Tips Forums the best source of engineering information on the Internet!

Register Log in
  • Congratulations JStephen on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Recent content by Frokilin

  1. F

    Feature of size for 2 plane features

    Yes, maybe I didn't explain myself well, but that's what I meant, that after carefully reading those paragraphs together wit the defection of AME, it's indicating that the example is not a FOS
  2. F

    Feature of size for 2 plane features

    Thanks greenimi. I guess I was missing the AME definition for the Irregular FOS to completely understand all the cases. Looking at 3.29 for the definition of actual mating envelope and then 3.35 for the different definitions of FOS, that example above doesn't fall under any of them
  3. F

    Feature of size for 2 plane features

    Hi, I believe this image here attached is not a FOS. If I am not right, please let me know. I just can't get a clear reason on the ASME 2018 standard since I find the definitions a little confusing to me. I have read online about the "2 opposed points" but I can't find something similar on the...
  4. F

    How to move physical product to another one catia V6

    Thanks ferdo. Engineering Connections I have never used and it's giving me an error when trying it. Robot I don't think it will place the part exactly where I want it and Snap is translating the part but not rotating it, and I need that rotation so all the cylinders are aligned
  5. F

    How to move physical product to another one catia V6

    Hi, I have a Physical product that I want to move to another one. Basically I need 2 Cylinders to 2 cylinders and 1 plane to 1 plane to match. In the Assembly design app, I have used the Snap move to match the plane to plane, and one cyl to the other. I am stuck because now I need to rotate...
  6. F

    Use the Drawing title block linear tolerance to control a Diametrical callout size - is it correct?

    Thanks Burunduk. That is because of para. 4.3.1 (b), right?
  7. F

    Use the Drawing title block linear tolerance to control a Diametrical callout size - is it correct?

    Would that diametral 67.5 size tolerance be covered with that linear tolerance note on the drawing notes?
  8. F

    Profile tolerance unless otherwise specified - WRT Datums vs no datums

    Refloating this In regards to that, wouldn't the para. 11.3.1.5 in Y14.5-2018 cover the all over? It doesn't specify to say "all over" when you place the note in the drawing general notes? "All Over Specification. A profile tolerance maybe applied all over the three-dimensional profile of a...
  9. F

    Profile tolerance unless otherwise specified - WRT Datums vs no datums

    Got it. As mentioned above if the note "model is basic" that would mean no basic dimension is needed for the surface profile to control the location? is that on the Y14.41 standard (I don't have access to it) mentioned in paragraph 5.1.1.2 (d) : "Basic dimensions shall be indicated on the...
  10. F

    Profile tolerance unless otherwise specified - WRT Datums vs no datums

    But like True positions implies "the theoretically exact location of a feature of size, as established by basic dimensions" The True profile doesn't relate the location to a basic dimension?
  11. F

    Profile tolerance unless otherwise specified - WRT Datums vs no datums

    Thank you both for your replies. Where in the 2018 standard implies that the surface profile controls location only when there is a basic dimension? I can't find it. I guess using the "all over" from that paragraph should work in that case. But, personally, I a trying to convince the designers...
  12. F

    Profile tolerance unless otherwise specified - WRT Datums vs no datums

    Got it now, with that wording I understood. I knew I was missing something but couldn't picture what. Thanks!
  13. F

    Profile tolerance unless otherwise specified - WRT Datums vs no datums

    But then, on my example above, aren't the tolerance zones the same on those surfaces for a surface profile with datums and with no datums? like couldn't both surfaces on both figures be anywhere in between the red dashed lines? I never paid attention to that figure, I wonder, if the control was...
  14. F

    Profile tolerance unless otherwise specified - WRT Datums vs no datums

    Isn't it profile with datums contoling shape, size, orientation and location, as mentioned above, and without datums same but no location? But I guess what I don't fully understand, if I had let's say a block with datums ABC being a plane, hole and slot, all of them prequalified. Then a surface...
  15. F

    Profile tolerance unless otherwise specified - WRT Datums vs no datums

    Hi, I have read some post but I didn't fin a clear answer for this question. When you have a drawing with datums defined, and a general note saying "Unless otherwise specified profile tolerance of: " What is the difference between having that surface profile called out back to datums or called...
See more

Part and Inventory Search

Back
Top