Back to the OP, here are some potential issues i see with the original design:
1) The design pressures don't meet the 10/13 rule, so the shell side might not be adequately protected in the event of a tube rupture. Probably best to set the shell side design pressure to at least 77% of the tube...
Sorry but I have to disagree with all of above responses. Differential thermal expansion isn't going to happen with modern clad plate so that's completely irrelevant. If the original exchanger was a TEMA CEU design you can't just arbitrarily convert it to an NEU as you would lose the ability to...
Technical specifications for electric process heaters as well as many of the other components you mentioned can be found here:
https://www.iogp-jip33.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Specification-Electric-Process-Heaters-S-723v2020-12.pdf
https://www.iogp.org/bookstore/product-category/jip33/...
I searched ASME's Interpretations database ( https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/SearchInterpretation.cfm ) but I couldn't find anything addressing how they define "water". This is something you'll have discuss with your jurisdictional authority and your Authorized Inspector.
-Christine
Just to provide the relevant background info selecting the appropriate tube-side velocity is a balancing act of the following considerations:
1) Pressure drop
2) Convective heat transfer
3) Fouling mitigation (higher velocities result in higher shear stress as the fluid interface with the ID of...
When you say "ID of the channel part" I'm assuming that you're referring to the shell cover. For a TEMA "S" exchanger the diameter of the shell cover has to be a bit larger in order to accommodate the floating head cover and the backing device, which are both necessarily larger in diameter than...
I think this part would be called a Dished & Internally Flared head. Very similar to a Flanged Only head. I've never seen one before, but there are several manufacturers that make Flanged Only/Dished & (externally) Flared heads in this size/thickness range.
-Christine
Split header boxes are not intended to operate independently, so you shouldn't need vents and drains on each section. I've never seen that done before.
That said, a small amount of fluid wouldn't be able to drain since the elevation of the lowest tube is always a bit higher than the elevation...
Forged SA-105 tubesheets are permitted in ASME Section VIII Div. 1 provided that all of the requirements of UG-6(c) are met.
"Forgings certified to SA-105, SA-181, SA-182, SA-350, SA-403, and SA-420 may be used as tubesheets and hollow cylindrical forgings for pressure vessel shells that...
r6155 proves once again that he's a brazen liar. Fixed tubesheet calculations are wildly complex. It would take months to write your own spreadsheet to perform these calculations.
-Christine
Refer to nonmandatory Appendix W in ASME Section VIII Div. 1 for guidance on the U-1A. Specifically see item (28) in Table W-3.
The thicknesses shown on the U-1 Data Reports have always referred to the Uncorroded condition.
-Christine
You can ALL CAPS "shout" all you want but the fact that TEMA now has a separate Appendix (and a non-mandatory at that) covering Repairs proves that the TEMA standards were never intended for new equipment. Table RCB-9.131 is not located inside Appendix B so it would not apply to this repair...
Please ignore r6155's comments. I suspect that he suffers from Advanced Senile Dementia, which would explain the hostile behavior and the irrelevant citation above. Furthermore he's never demonstrated any knowledge whatsoever of heat exchangers in his previous posts here.
TEMA standards are for...