Burunduk's latest activity

What's the problem with the term GD&T? It has been standardized for many years now to mean General Dimensioning and Tolerancing...

Lots of dimensions and a lot of them can't be evaluated reliably if the general +/-0.1 from the note applies to them. Now you have no...

yes Burunduk if the hole had to be precise for a press fit , then RFS would be prefered

greenimi, The function of MMC position is to allow clearance fit with a feature that is fixed in a mating part that interfaces with the...

So, you are asking about RMB (the datum feature material boundary modifier), not about RFS (for the mutually locating position tolerance...

greenimi, RFS would be interpretable. In terms of the requirement it's two dia. 0.15 mm coaxial cylindrical tol. zones in which the two...

mfgenggear, Yes, I'm not sure why there is the basic dia. 39, maybe OP was thinking to control it with a general profile? Anyway I'd...

Limited length or area dimensions are a lot like datum target area dimensions. You don't control their variation on the part drawing...

I'd probably do something like that:

I don't mean to sound like a technophobe, but why not just do a pen/pencil sketch and post a scan or picture? That looks like a lot of...

Or as shown in these examples... The first one is the same as using a Continuous Feature modifier for the 35+/-0.1 diameter.

Season, In the second case, there is no control over how off-coaxial the two ends can be. Here is an exaggerated illustration.

Tolerances for the fixture design should be about 1/10 of the tolerances being verified by the fixture.

greenimi, A cylindricity tolerance zone, whether per unit length or full length, is always 2 coaxial cylinders. Suppose a measured zone...

mfgenggear, I think there could be a go gage fixture as 3DDave described: two recesses of diameter 20.53 and a saddle of diameter 23.1...