The nature of crystalline and amorphous polymer states is often misconstrued and misused. The term amorphous means to have no defined shape, or an easily altered shape, like a liquid or a rubber. Crystalline, on the other hand, insinuates that there is a regular, defined pattern to the molecular aggregates --- crystallized carbon forms a substance we call ôdiamondö. These terms are used to define two separate ôsolidö states that exist particularly in polymers. The confusing part is that they coexist in many polymers --- the so-called semi-crystalline polymers.
The amorphous nature of polymers is analogous to a plateful of spaghetti --- loose and randomly coiled. While the crystalline state is more like the uncooked spaghetti in the box --- the chains are all tightly bundled and ordered in the same direction.
In a polymer, these two states coexist, with adjacent sections polymers packing into tight crystalline bundles held together by secondary attraction forces, while other sections of the same molecules are unable to physically move into the crystalline lattice and remain amorphous. For the most part, the probability of a particular polymer segment being crystalline or amorphous is purely a random event controlled by the dynamics of the crystallization process --- in effect, the portion of the segment that is in the amorphous state is no different from that part of the polymer which got ôtrappedö in the crystallized state.
Oftentimes someone will discuss extracting the ôamorphousö material out of the polymer. To some extent, this can be performed particularly where the amorphous state is composed of polymer fractions that are not acceptable into the polymer lattice, i.e., highly branched species, or very low molecular weight polymer fractions. This procedure was once used to extract atactic polypropylene from a polymerization to enhance its crystalline content. In reality, this is merely a procedure for removing a contaminant, non-crystallizable atactic polypropylene, from the crystallizable isotactic polymer form. For most polymers, however, one cannot extract the amorphous material from the crystalline sections.
In general, polymers which can crystallize, do so until they can no longer get into a conformation or position to ôpackö with other chains because of some physical restraint. The only difference between amorphous polymer and crystalline polymer is that the amorphous material physically could not enter the crystalline lattice at the time it was formed. The amorphous state, therefore, consists of loose chain ends, ôloopsö of polymer segments that exit and then reenter the same crystalline domain, as well as polymer segments which crystallize in two adjacent lattices --- tie molecules. Tie molecules are amorphous polymer segments which hold the crystalline segments together --- they form the mortar between the bricks which enhances the properties of semi-crystalline polymers. Without these intercrystalline links, there would be nothing holding the polymer together except weak secondary attractive forces.
Today, the pace of innovation in the manufacturing industry is faster than ever before, but at the same time engineers are under increased pressure to get concepts to market quickly. Development teams must make fast and accurate decisions during the conceptual stage of design.
In the components business price can often be the determining factor as to what product the manufacturer uses. For a great many mass-market products and applications, the low-cost off-the-shelf, one-piece stamped receptacle fits the bill. The price is right, the performance is adequate. Download Now
In today’s cost-sensitive world, designers are often driven to specify the lowest cost solution for every aspect of their designs to ensure that their solution is competitively priced and their company remains profitable. However, specifying a low-cost, low-quality connector solution can result in premature failure, considerable re-work costs and damage to reputations.
Increasingly, product and services companies are seeking more information and control in the
operational lifecycle of their products, including service and use. Better information about the operational lifecycle, and the ability to use that information, requires more than just unstructured data flowing back from products in the field.