INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS
Log In
Come Join Us!
Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
- Talk With Other Members
- Be Notified Of Responses
To Your Posts
- Keyword Search
- One-Click Access To Your
Favorite Forums
- Automated Signatures
On Your Posts
- Best Of All, It's Free!
- Students Click Here
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.
Posting Guidelines
Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden. Students Click Here
|
Mechanical Behavior
|
What's the difference between Crystalline and Amorphous States? by RichGeoffroy
Posted: 10 Jun 04 (Edited 27 Sep 04)
|
Rich Geoffroy
Polymer Services Group
POLYSERV@cox.net
The nature of crystalline and amorphous polymer states is often misconstrued and misused. The term amorphous means to have no defined shape, or an easily altered shape, like a liquid or a rubber. Crystalline, on the other hand, insinuates that there is a regular, defined pattern to the molecular aggregates --- crystallized carbon forms a substance we call ôdiamondö. These terms are used to define two separate ôsolidö states that exist particularly in polymers. The confusing part is that they coexist in many polymers --- the so-called semi-crystalline polymers.
The amorphous nature of polymers is analogous to a plateful of spaghetti --- loose and randomly coiled. While the crystalline state is more like the uncooked spaghetti in the box --- the chains are all tightly bundled and ordered in the same direction.
In a polymer, these two states coexist, with adjacent sections polymers packing into tight crystalline bundles held together by secondary attraction forces, while other sections of the same molecules are unable to physically move into the crystalline lattice and remain amorphous. For the most part, the probability of a particular polymer segment being crystalline or amorphous is purely a random event controlled by the dynamics of the crystallization process --- in effect, the portion of the segment that is in the amorphous state is no different from that part of the polymer which got ôtrappedö in the crystallized state.
Oftentimes someone will discuss extracting the ôamorphousö material out of the polymer. To some extent, this can be performed particularly where the amorphous state is composed of polymer fractions that are not acceptable into the polymer lattice, i.e., highly branched species, or very low molecular weight polymer fractions. This procedure was once used to extract atactic polypropylene from a polymerization to enhance its crystalline content. In reality, this is merely a procedure for removing a contaminant, non-crystallizable atactic polypropylene, from the crystallizable isotactic polymer form. For most polymers, however, one cannot extract the amorphous material from the crystalline sections.
In general, polymers which can crystallize, do so until they can no longer get into a conformation or position to ôpackö with other chains because of some physical restraint. The only difference between amorphous polymer and crystalline polymer is that the amorphous material physically could not enter the crystalline lattice at the time it was formed. The amorphous state, therefore, consists of loose chain ends, ôloopsö of polymer segments that exit and then reenter the same crystalline domain, as well as polymer segments which crystallize in two adjacent lattices --- tie molecules. Tie molecules are amorphous polymer segments which hold the crystalline segments together --- they form the mortar between the bricks which enhances the properties of semi-crystalline polymers. Without these intercrystalline links, there would be nothing holding the polymer together except weak secondary attractive forces.
|
Back to Polymer engineering FAQ Index
Back to Polymer engineering Forum
|
|
Resources
The day after creating a proof-of-concept for your custom IC, you might ask, “Now, what do we do?� It is time to make your idea real and start developing a system prototype. Download NowBack in 1790, Luigi Galvani was dissecting a frog and noticed that he could cause its leg to move when touching a nerve with two probes. Download NowManufacturers are at a critical juncture. Either they evolve their product processes or get disrupted by new competitors who have been built from the ground up to develop complex systems and products defined by software. Download NowSavvy engineers have eagerly anticipated the impact of virtual reality (VR) on robot programming technology, as it can dramatically increase productivity by empowering engineers to do their jobs safer and more efficiently. Download Now
|
|
Join Eng-Tips® Today!
Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.
Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:
Talk To Other Members- Notification Of Responses To Questions
- Favorite Forums One Click Access
- Keyword Search Of All Posts, And More...
Register now while it's still free!
Already a member? Close this window and log in.
Join Us Close
