×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Part Environment

How do I create realistic threads in a SolidWorks part? by Eltron
Posted: 27 Oct 08 (Edited 12 Nov 08)

This topic comes up over and over again, so I thought that I'd put together some of the more popular ways to create a thread in a part environment along with some statistics and reasoning as to why one method would be preferred over another.  It should be noted that this may not be a complete list of threading methods, since in this case there is more than one way to thread a cat.

Before you decide to cut threads into your part, a design decision must be made which determines the relative value of modeling the threads.  Thread features are often very resource intensive at the part level, and that issue only magnifies when multiple parts are inserted into an assembly.  The best policy, depending upon design intent, is to avoid modeling threads in SolidWorks if at all possible.  Having said that, below is a list of six ways to model threads (same process for both internal and external threads) in order of increasing complexity of operations:

      I.    No threads.  This is the baseline from which the other numbers have been extracted.  Imagine a simple socket-head cap screw shape without threads.  # of features = 4.  Rebuild time = 0.00-0.02 sec.

     II.    Cosmetic Threads.  Go to Insert/Annotations/ Cosmetic Threads.  This paints a visual representation of threads onto your feature.  It also imports a thread callout into your drawing.  This method does not add any features to your model, and it does not increase rebuild time.  It is somewhat parametric as it will partially update with design changes.  The disadvantages are that it doesn't look very realistic, behaves quirky sometimes, and doesn't show up in model rendering.  # of features = 4.  Rebuild time = 0.00-0.02 sec.

    III.    Simple Swept Profile.  Draw a line following the temporary axis of your feature.  Draw your thread profile.  Do a Swept Cut, and choose Twist Along Path.  Input the number of turns required.  This is a very quick and easy way to cut threads into your feature.  It is partially dynamic depending upon your sketch relations.  # of features = 7.  Rebuild time = 0.06-0.09 sec.

     IV.    Revolved Threads.  Draw your thread profile.  Do a Revolved Cut around your temporary axis.  Do a linear pattern of your cuts.  Again, this is a quick and easy way to model threads.  The disadvantage is that it is not an actual thread since the cut is revolved and not swept.  This method serves to get the point across without being too resource intensive.  # of features = 7.  Rebuild time = 0.09 sec.

      V.    Helix Method.  Draw a helix that wraps around your feature.  Draw your thread profile.  Do a Swept Cut of your profile following your helix.  This is a very realistic method for creating threads, as you can control the pitch, height, starting angle, etc. of your helix in a simple property manager.  The major disadvantage is that helixes are notoriously resource intensive, and it is not dynamic.   The amount of resource that swept cuts following a helix command depends upon many factors including the pitch and how/where the cut starts.  # of features = 8.  As far as rebuild time goes, I got significantly variable results in the range of 0.20 to 45.34 sec depending on how I constructed the cut.  With the cut starting 180° from the helix start point, I was able to reproducibly get 0.20 sec rebuilds.

     VI.    Swept Surface.  Draw a line following your temporary axis.  Draw a line perpendicular with that line (in a separate sketch) that is collinear with the top or bottom of your feature (or wherever you want your cut to start).  Pick Swept Surface and sweep the second line around the first with a Twist Along Path option.  Match the parameters to your thread pitch.  Convert the edge of this surface into a 3D sketch.  This should essentially be the same as a helix.  Draw your thread profile.  Do a Swept Cut that follows the 3D sketch.  Although this method seems like it is overly complicated at first, it has the benefit of being completely parametrically driven depending upon your sketch relations.  It will update your cuts to your model changes.  The major disadvantage is that it is a resource hog.  # of features = 10.  Rebuild time = 18.33-19.86 sec.

If threading is something that you have to do very often then I would suggest creating Design Features and reusing them.  If you use standard threads you can even create "Taps" and "Dies" that you can position in your parts and use the Combine Feature to remove the material where your threads should go.  All of these design methods depend on the environment that you work in and what the intent of the project is.

If this is something that you run into often I would suggest that you submit an enhancement request to SolidWorks and talk to your VAR about the necessity of a thread-creation utility that works similar to the Hole-Wizard.  Then wait...patiently...

Hopefully this helps.
 

Back to DASSAULT: SOLIDWORKS 3D Design FAQ Index
Back to DASSAULT: SOLIDWORKS 3D Design Forum

My Archive


Resources

Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close