Engineering Apprenticeship
Engineering Apprenticeship
(OP)
One improvement that I would like to see with the engineering profession, is a mandatory requirement for engineering apprenticeship. When I attended college, there was a little known program called "Cooperative Engineering" where engineering students could alternate work/study. The Cooperative refers to a partnership between the university and industry. Under the Coop program, you were able to receive a small number of credit hours toward graduation, and evaluate work as a "junior engineer". That was the time to change your major, which some students did after 1 semester of work. This program was also a way of making money to pay for your education. The upside was exposure to engineering work, developing contacts and when I returned to school during non-work semesters, I was so far ahead of most engineering students that had NO clue what an engineer does. The down side was it took 5 years to graduate instead of 4 because alternating semesters resulted in missing certain courses that were offered only once a year.
The extra year was well worth it. I had worked at a research center for a fortune 500 company during my Junior and Senior years. The work experience plus networking helped me to land a job. So, my suggestion to potential engineering students is to enroll in a similar program and not worry about rushing thru 4 years of college.
The extra year was well worth it. I had worked at a research center for a fortune 500 company during my Junior and Senior years. The work experience plus networking helped me to land a job. So, my suggestion to potential engineering students is to enroll in a similar program and not worry about rushing thru 4 years of college.





RE: Engineering Apprenticeship
I would take this idea even farther; I don't think that any NON co-op engineering program should be accredited.
I once raised this question with an engineering professor who had moved into a bureaucratic position at his university. He said that "after 18 months on the job you can't tell any difference" and besides, there was not enough industry in close proximty to his school to make a co-op program feasible. My thinking on that is perhaps his university should not have an engineering faculty in the first place! (In fact, some time later two departments in the engineering faculty of this particular university did close due to a lack of enrollment.)
RE: Engineering Apprenticeship
That post belongs in the "Best Engineering Advice I ever got" thread.
In addition to the Co-Op programs, many universities (and individual schools) have contacts with industry for intern programs. The nice thing about them is that the internships are during the summer session and you don't have the once-a-year class problem. This is pretty common in Petroleum. I'm not sure how widespread it is in other fields.
I was talking to a Professor at Texas Tech last week and he said that the Spring of 2004 was the first time in his 5-year tenure that they didn't have 100% of the graduating students with jobs - the one person who didn't get a job was one of very few in the program who didn't take advantage of the intern program (and had mediocre grades).
Co-op's work, Interships work. Rushing quickly through college is just a poor idea.
David Simpson, PE
MuleShoe Engineering
www.muleshoe-eng.com
Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.
The Plural of "anecdote" is not "data"
RE: Engineering Apprenticeship
Incidentally, I don't find that many employers hiring entry level take much appreciation in a quality co-op experience. During my co-op, I interacted like one of the engineering team, ran my own projects, learned lean manufacturing, and designed some systems. Some co-ops only run the photocopier.
ChemE, M.E. EIT
"The only constant in life is change." -Bruce Lee
RE: Engineering Apprenticeship
Also a lot of schools only let the students with higher marks take apprenticeships.
RE: Engineering Apprenticeship
"I once raised this question with an engineering professor who had moved into a bureaucratic position at his university. He said that "after 18 months on the job you can't tell any difference" and besides, there was not enough industry in close proximty to his school to make a co-op program feasible. "
Unh huh. Remind me again why I have such enormous respect for university professors.
Cheers
Greg Locock
RE: Engineering Apprenticeship
If we had a wish list for engineering school requirements it should be that people take a trade before their engineering degree.
RE: Engineering Apprenticeship
------------------------------
If we learn from our mistakes,
I'm getting a great education!
RE: Engineering Apprenticeship
I gave you a star ScottyUK for the valuable observation:
I think the idea is great, but the reality in Britain is that there are few apprenticeships to be had, and summer placements with engineering companies are even rarer.
Does this not indicate that enrollments in engineering programs are too high?
RE: Engineering Apprenticeship
RE: Engineering Apprenticeship
In response to learning a trade prior to graduating in engineering, I agree... not necessarily for the sake of having a fall-back career, but at a minimum for the sake of knowing what we engineers are asking our tradesperson counter-parts to do for us.
I am a chemical engineer by training. Drafting was barely covered in school. But now in industry, I have fixtures and tools machined all the time. It would have been nice to know the limitations of common machines and machinists prior to drafting plans and handing them off. These are things I would only truly know if I had been trained to use these machines myself. I feel the same about plumbing and valving when I design a fluid system. What do I know? I only read about it.
ChemE, M.E. EIT
"The only constant in life is change." -Bruce Lee
RE: Engineering Apprenticeship
Are the engineering course enrollments too high? To meet the UK's requirement for engineers, yes it is far too high. Why do we need so few engineers? Because our indigenous engineering base is almost gone due to long-term underinvestment, by our successive goverments (of both colours) and by short-sighted management with little or no idea of what they are managing.
The problem of over-supply is compounded because the few areas where the demand is stronger - power engineering, for example - are the very areas which are seen as 'difficult' by the students, and which are expensive for the educational establishments to teach. The net result of these factors is that the shortage gets more acute. As it is there are a dwindling number of experts in the UK who are knowledgable enough to teach power engineering properly, and few who want to learn about them.
------------------------------
If we learn from our mistakes,
I'm getting a great education!
RE: Engineering Apprenticeship
The best advice is to learn as much as you can about your job and those of your associates. By helping them, you learn and benefit not only them, the company you work for, but also (most importantly) yourself. You become valuable to your firm and you develop abilities that will help you through all walks of life and when necessary future career opportunities!
RE: Engineering Apprenticeship
Tradesmen often view engineers with the same jaundiced eye that many engineers view university professors with,"...stuck in an ivory tower...", "...no idea how things ACTUALLY work..." etc. etc. Sometimes this is arises from the 20/20 hindsight of a person in the field observing the results of design work that took place hundreds of miles away on a CAD screen, but often it's a well-deserved and accurate observation.
Engineers should not be permitted to move directly from a non-co-op school to a consulting engineering business whose only product is paper. Without a hard grounding in and experience with physical reality, job-site conditions, the limitations of tools and techniques etc., an engineer is prone to design errors arising from "failures of imagination". Without feedback between the design process and its physical results, the system is out of control and learning is accidental at best. An engineer needs well-calibrated commonsense to avoid these problems, and the only way to get that is experience actually doing something other than drawing things in CAD and doing calcs. I agree with QCE that trades experience is extremely beneficial to an engineer's training. But no university, regardless how well funded, can provide this sort of physical experience through labs or projects- work experience is the only way these students are going to get the experience they need.
RE: Engineering Apprenticeship
I think at most Australian Universities (if not all) Engineering students are required to complete at least 3 months of recognised work experience before they can graduate. After seven years of working I was still required to complete a report to demonstrate I had met these minimum requirements.
RE: Engineering Apprenticeship
This would be acceptable.
Anything less would be consider an accident waiting to happen.
There are many companys in the UK that stipulate a full apprenticeship as one of the criteria needed to qualify for a vacant job role in engineering.
The companys that dont require apprentice trained personnel will accept gradutes, so long as they are paid what there worth.
You see many engineering jobs offered as --£15K recently qualified graduates required..!
When they could be earning £25K plus.
RE: Engineering Apprenticeship
Cheers
Greg Locock
RE: Engineering Apprenticeship
To "moltenmetal": Wouldn't a lot of internships be of the paper-producing variety as well?
RE: Engineering Apprenticeship
sms is providing some great advice over in the "tailspin" thread, so I thought it worth repeating here. To quote his Aug 11 post:
"As I said, my grades coming out of college were not great, actually a 2.8 on a 4.0 scale, and I did not graduate from a famous school. I received my BSME from New Mexico State University. A fine school, but not famous. So without the grades what led my first employer to hire me? I had co-op experience, which helped a bunch, I had worked during my schooling as a teachers assistant, grading papers and tutoring under classmen, and I had held every leadership position available in the ASME student section at my college, including president. I had also participated in ASME national events including the Summer Annual Meeting, and the Student Leaders conference, as well as regional student conferences. I had also taken and passed the fundamentals of engineering exam. All of that at least got some interest in my resume, beyond to initial reaction to my grades."
Frankly, most employers are far more impressed with experience of any kind than a high grade point average (there are a few exceptions of course). A student may be a wiz at theoretical topics taught in advanced engineering courses, but if a prospective employer has no need for these, he will hire based on experience and this gives the advantage to co-op graduates.
RE: Engineering Apprenticeship
However, I don't see the need to revoke accredidation to Universities/Colleges that have no offerings. This would be adding more politics to the picture (which we don't need). Things seem to work out fine for themselves now and most students understand the value of co-op programs. "Government", whether it be federal, state, city, or county is big enough lets not make it bigger.
RE: Engineering Apprenticeship
This guy was a gradute engineer, brilliant at project managing.
But we needed him to muck in and give us a hand, a bit of fitting, electrical installation work, welding etc, he could not do any of them, some engineer...!
Thats what you get for not doing an apprenticeship.
RE: Engineering Apprenticeship
I don't think an engineering apprenticeship along the lines of co-op would teach those "trade" skills either.
Electrical engineers are not electricians, and vice versa.
Hydraulic engineers are not plumbers.
Metallurgists are not welders.
Geotechnical engineers are not Cat drivers.
Agricultural engineers are not farmers.
Civil/Structural engineers are neither carpenters nor masons.
Mechanical engineers are not machinists.
The trade skills are not necessarily a subset of the engineering skills. If you can do both, it means that you are fortunate enough to have two sets of skills, not that you're a rare example of a "real" engineer.
If you're an engineer on projects that involve such skills, you should understand what it takes to do them so that you don't design something unbuildable, but it doesn't mean you need to be able to physically build it yourself. That's not what engineers are for, and chances are the engineer doesn't do enough of the trade skill to be as reliable at it as an experienced tradesperson.
Hg
RE: Engineering Apprenticeship
I agree with you there one hundred percent. For some reason there is confusion between technician/tradesmen and engineer. But, I’m beating a dead horse here. I did my engineering internship at a company, and it consisted doing test and analysis with the physicists. We had our technicians do the set up work per our (me and my mentor who is an ABET graduated engineer) design to accommodate the physicists test. I did not touch a tool (well that was due to the technician’s union rules). My mentor showed me how to work with the physicist and find out what he wanted to do. Then we came up with a plan to do the design. He showed me some of the typical analysis that he does for the field we were designing in. We picked out the equipment and hardware we needed. Came up with a design and had the physicist concur with us that this is what we (as a group) should do. Had the apparatus built by the machinist and had the techs put it together and then ran the physicist’s test with success. Wow, this is basically what I’m doing now but in a different field. I have never touched a lath or milling machine. Don’t get me wrong, our machinist are great, they would give me there opinion even if I did not ask for it. But, at the end of the day, my design has to work the way that I intended. If it did not, trust me the machinist or tech will not be the people to blame, it will be me the engineer.
Go Mechanical Engineering
Tobalcane
RE: Engineering Apprenticeship
Since I have come out so strongly in favor of co-op programs (in this thread and others), I think I'd better clear up any misunderstanding of what I mean.
The type of program I'm recommending has students working under the direct supervision of experienced engineers so that they can learn what engineering is really like. If a university is just placing students in odd jobs as helpers to tradespeople, they really don't have a good co-op program.
And HgTX, I am becoming a huge fan of your posts. I have known electricians who completed engineering programs and could legitimately claim both titles. But an EE grad with only university training who think "trade skills" are merely "a subset of the engineering skills" needs a good talking to before someone gets hurt!
I know some companies think this way, but I think this should be illegal. The lengthy apprenticeship and strict licensing requirements for electricians exist for good reason. The distinction between tradespeople and engineers is perhaps worthy of its own thread, but I'll leave that up to someone else to start.
RE: Engineering Apprenticeship
I thought about starting a new thread but dunno if it quite warrants it.
I've run into the engineer/tradesperson problem in my own job.
(1) I can't weld. I've done just enough of it to know I can't, and to know what someone needs to be able to do. Experience with welding would help me a little with my job, but I'm not going to spend my time in a welding class when I could be spending that time taking metallurgy courses, learning more about ultrasonic testing, etc.
(2) My office is the engineering support for QA inspectors. Someone got the idea that the engineers should be certified welding inspectors as well--not just for our training (good idea) but so that we could fill in for the inspectors (really bad idea). There is a world of difference between an engineer who happens to have taken a training class and a CWI who walks the shop floor daily, and if they're short an inspector they need to hire an outside contractor, not throw me in there to fake it. I'm not sure whether I was persuasive or the powers that be have short attention spans, but the whole thing went away.
Back to the original topic, I never did a co-op. Engineering was my second bachelor's degree and I didn't have the time. I worked on a research project which gave me a little more real-world experience than classroom work alone would have.
So I don't really know exactly what co-op programs offer. They seem like a very good idea. But I can't imagine any co-op that could possibly have prepared me for my job. Without any of these appearing in my job description, I am a manager, a consultant, a negotiator, a moderator, an investigator, a technical writer--and that's been my job since my first day out of grad school.
Hg
RE: Engineering Apprenticeship
RE: Engineering Apprenticeship
I'm a specialist so I didn't go that route, but I was sent to various external training courses and did an 8-month job rotation in another division. Training opportunities continue throughout the employee's career and a training plan is part of our written performance plan. Most of what I do, though, I learned on the job.
I'm under the impression that training opportunities are better for us than they are in the private sector.
Hg