INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Jobs

Rear axle location--WOBLINK design

Rear axle location--WOBLINK design

(OP)
I am considering implementing a woblink to replace the panhard rod on my SCCA F500 car.  Yes, those cars that really don't have much in the way of a real suspension, but I do get close to three inches of travel at all corners.  It really works well, despite the lack of real springs or shocks.

The problem:
Susp3D calculations put my front roll center at close to 5 inches below ground.  The rear with a panhard rod is at about five-six inches above ground, depending on wheel, tire, and ride height changes.   That is a big roll inclination.

I think a Woblink would work to better balance the car with a lower rear roll center.  I would like to try to run some tests with a Woblink, but I cannot find construction info on one.  The only online diagram I have found seems to be incorret, as the formula provided does not match the design in the picture.

http://www.rx7.se/Bilder/snordatorn/Woblink.jpg

Anyone with construction advice?  
jim

RE: Rear axle location--WOBLINK design

What's wrong with the picture?

Cheers

Greg Locock

RE: Rear axle location--WOBLINK design

(OP)
the upper diagrams show lengths that are really not proportional as the formula would show.  I wanted to be sure that there is not some other bits that they were not including.

jim

RE: Rear axle location--WOBLINK design

Looks fine to me.

Cheers

Greg Locock

RE: Rear axle location--WOBLINK design

Incidentally why not use a Mumford linkage instead? It would be much easier to package I think. It is more complex, but there is a great deal to be said for symmetry in suspension designs.

Cheers

Greg Locock

RE: Rear axle location--WOBLINK design

(OP)
not enough room for a mumford link.  I will barely have room for a woblink.  The panhard rod barely fits as it is.  I do agree that it is a superior design.

jim

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources

eBook: Metal 3D Printing
Metal can provide strength like no other material can and, throughout our history on Earth, humans have learned to harness metals for ever greater specialized applications, from radiation shielding on spacecraft to conductive components on circuits. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close