×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

H-Piles bearing on shale

H-Piles bearing on shale

H-Piles bearing on shale

(OP)
When bearing on shale,  should the bearing area be the projected overall area of the H-pile or the area of the steel or shoe?  I know it depends on whether a plug forms but unfortunately it is not possible to directly view this. The shale is not considered friable with N-values typically in the range of 100 blows for 1-4 inches.  The piles hit practical refusal at about 1 ft into the shale.

RE: H-Piles bearing on shale

In my opinion you would have to treat the pile as unplugged.  However, either way you also should consider the skin friction for the remainder of the pile.

RE: H-Piles bearing on shale

(OP)
It is all recent mine spoil (60 Ft) which is giving huge negative skin friction loads.

RE: H-Piles bearing on shale

You should use structural strength of pile. The area of steel will provide a low value of end bearing. The drag load can be equated against the structural pile capacity. Otherwise you will incur a large number of piles than necessary.

RE: H-Piles bearing on shale

Try checking out Canadian Geotechnical Journals.  They drive a lot of H-piles in Ontario (Toronto) region for supporting highway bridges on shale.  Also try to see about any reports from Ontario's DOT equivalent (MTC, now, I believe).

RE: H-Piles bearing on shale

cbosy:

I agree with VAD to use the structural strength of the pile (in other words, to use a capacity for the pile equivalent to a failure of the pile in compression).  I practice in Ohio in the U.S. and we frequently drive piles to refusal in shale as you describe.  The standard of practice is to refer to the compressive failure of the pile cross-section and to expect settlements that would correspond to the axial shortening of the pile itself.  The ODOT website can give design guidance in this respect.

Glen

RE: H-Piles bearing on shale

(OP)
For all your information, an HP 12x74 experienced a plunging failure at 234 tons with a resultant steel stress of 21.5 ksi (it was 50 ksi yield strength).  I can't see how your design using the "structural strength of the pile" comes into play from a design stand point.

RE: H-Piles bearing on shale

Like VAD and gandersen, here is PA we typically design a HP 12x74 based on structural capacity, as well, if driven to absolute refusal on bedrock.  I caught your last note about the plunging failure at 234 tons and wonder if this shale formation is known for relaxation like the Conemaugh here in PA.  Did you redrive any after waiting 48 to 72 hours?

RE: H-Piles bearing on shale

(OP)
Yes,  it was redriven after waiting about 2.5 days (Fri. afternoon until Mon morning) and the capacity theoretically went up to 345 tons based on blow counts and the Wave Equation but was not statically load tested again to check this capacity.

RE: H-Piles bearing on shale

Hi cbosy,

From a structural point of view in this situation, I use the cross sectional area of the pile.

Regards

VOD

RE: H-Piles bearing on shale

or shoe.

VOD

RE: H-Piles bearing on shale

Was the pile pulled, or left as a production pile?  I'd be concerned about buckling - although you didn't give us the embedment length.  The longer the pile, the bigger the risk.

Buckled piles can seem to be quite "stiff" on redriving, yet still have a diminished ultimate capacity.  Proceed with caution -



Please see FAQ731-376 for great suggestions on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.  See FAQ158-922 for recommendations regarding the question, "How Do You Evaluate Fill Settlement Beneath Structures?"

RE: H-Piles bearing on shale

(OP)
The pile will not be used as a production pile.  The length was 60 ft and there was no indication of buckling.

RE: H-Piles bearing on shale

Pull it and look at it.  Let us know what you find.



Please see FAQ731-376 for great suggestions on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.  See FAQ158-922 for recommendations regarding the question, "How Do You Evaluate Fill Settlement Beneath Structures?"

RE: H-Piles bearing on shale

Perhaps your hammer was not large enough to overcome the driving skin friction and drive the pile to its full structural capacity.  Just a thought.  Although piles are often designed based on their structural capacity there are a variety of reasons why it might not be appropriate for a particular design.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources