×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Pavement Elevation Tolerances

Pavement Elevation Tolerances

Pavement Elevation Tolerances

(OP)
For a large, broad, paved (ACP) commercial lot (a parking lot for example) I would appreciate your comments as to a reasonable construction tolerance in elevation from design to as-constructed grades.  

RE: Pavement Elevation Tolerances

SirAl - as you are undoubtedly aware, the biggest problem in such a lot is the local ponding of water so you should be pretty tight on the tolerances. You should see the crap in our office parking lot here.  Big problem is the "small" working areas (corners, short runs, and the like).

I don't have any specs for such a large parking area - in our highway project we use plus/minus 6mm for asphalt work and plus/minus 10mm for base course (both laid with a paver).  Our surface irregularity is a "few" greater than 7mm and "more" greater than 4mm.  The ability of realizing the tolerances, of course, is more in line with contractor's experienced personnels' attention to detail and good workmanship.

RE: Pavement Elevation Tolerances

Our DOT tolerance for deviation in the surface course is 1/4 plus/minus when using a ten foot straightedge.  If the max deviation is taken at the midpoint of the straightedge, the resulting grade is 0.42% which will neither effect the ridability of the road nor present a problem with drainage.

However, when parking lot designers use a minimal grade of 1% there is greater potential for a ponding or spread problem.  When there is little room for error in the finished grade, the triming and fine grading of the subbase is critical.  Any paver adjustments while moving to accomodate pavement thickess can translate into high or low points.  Good luck with the finished surface.

RE: Pavement Elevation Tolerances

Sorry - to clarify - surface regularity is measured by 3m straight-edge at centrepoint - like MPENN's.

RE: Pavement Elevation Tolerances

generally with parking lot design, better to specify steeper slopes, such as 2% minimum.  Even with poor tolerances on the paving, it will still drain (no birdbaths)

RE: Pavement Elevation Tolerances

In general, I prefer MINIMUM pavement slopes of 1.0% for concrete and 2.0% for asphalt.  As far as tolorances go, MPENN's comment of 1/4" +/-, boils down to 1/4" maximum under a 10' straight edge.  Compare that to the "normal" floor slab tolorance of 1/8" +/-.  It is actually a pretty tight tolorance.  The FF System developed by the Face Corporation has been adopted by ACI and, while it takes some getting used to, it provides a way of measuring pavement flatness and level.

Two good sources of information on tolorances for paving and floor slabs would be the Portland Cement Association (PCA) and the American Concrete Insititute (ACI).  They both have specific publications and specifications that address the topic.

RE: Pavement Elevation Tolerances

I agree with many of the comments that your are receiving - the slope (1% minimum, 2% desired) is probably the most important design feature. As jheidt2543 mentioned the F Number system is a very nice, objective way to define surface flatness. Many engineers think of it a tool for the construction of "super-flat, super-level" floors. However the F number can easily be selected to acheive "everyday" tolerances.
At the expansion of an industrial plant in the early 1990's we had the flatness F number measured for many existing slabs that we knew from experience had good drainage characteristics. From this data base, we selected F numbers to specify for new construction. This approach to specification enforcement worked well.

RE: Pavement Elevation Tolerances

(OP)
Thanks for your input. I value your comments.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources