×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Associative Dimensions Changing in Paper Space

Associative Dimensions Changing in Paper Space

Associative Dimensions Changing in Paper Space

(OP)
Has anyone encountered an instance when an existing associative dimension in paper space changes its dimension value?  This has happened to several of us in my company more than once when we zoom in or out in paper space, switch from one layout to another, after plotting, or at other times.  It seems to happen randomly in only some drawings, only to some dimensions, and only in some viewports.  Very mysterious.  And dangerous.  

For example, I recently found a dimension on a drawing reading 3/8" instead of the 3" it was supposed to be.  It had been placed in paper space in a viewport with a scale of 1 1/2" = 1'-0" and associated with an element in model space.  When checking its properties I found its dim scale to be 1 instead of the -8 it should have been.  All the other dimensions in that same viewport were fine.

Any suggestions?

RE: Associative Dimensions Changing in Paper Space

The only time that I have a similar experience is when I unintentionally pick an entity that is in paperspace, not model space.  For example if I have dimensioned an entity in model space and then I try to pull off another dimension and accidentally pick the paperspace dimension extension line it gives me a resultatnt dimension based on paperspace units.  Also, this occurs if you try to run a dimension crossing over more than one viewport.  AutoCAD will give the resultant dimension in paperspace units.

RE: Associative Dimensions Changing in Paper Space

  I've had similar problems with both Acad LT '97 and full version Acad 2002.  Existing dimensions that read correctly when they were created will later spontaneously forget their values.  I should point out that there are two different types of associative dimensions you can have in paperspace.  My "forgetful dimensions" were the old-style associative which depended on you creating a dimension style that had the scale factor already set.  The newer "transdimensional" (which was supposed to automatically scale the value for the distance)had its own problems, like not working on some entities.

  It appears that paperspace dimensions will never be fixed by Autodesk and are going to fail intermittently.  In general, Autocad seems to have lost its reliability over the last several years.

Joe Dunfee

RE: Associative Dimensions Changing in Paper Space

Associative dimensions in paperspace must have their nodes anchored on a point over the object being dimensioned.
In other words, you can dimension to endpoints, centres etc and the dimensions usually keep their place.
However you cannot use coordinate filters (.x of and .y of etc) if the dimension node is then placed away from your model space object.  You also cannot use 'perpendicular to' fo placing dimension nodes.  If you do, then the dimensions lose their places when views are regenerated or the drawing reopened.
I do not know if the problem has been fixed in AutoCAD 2005.  The problem makes paperspace dimensions rather useless for all but the simplest of drawings.

RE: Associative Dimensions Changing in Paper Space

I have had great sucess with paper space dimensions of model space entities.  I am very careful to snap to model space entities.  Also, be sure to set DIMASSOC to 2.  We use R2004 on Win2000 and WinXP machines.

RE: Associative Dimensions Changing in Paper Space

While snapping to objects is necessary, the problems appear even when you do that. The only way I know of, which seems to be reliable is to not snap to the object, but rather select the entity. I.e. select the whole line to dimension, rather than its endpoints. This process will fail on objects that transpacial dimensions don't like. This way, at least, you know that your dimension is invalid.

For me, 95% of my entites are things that version 2002 doesn't like for transpacial dimensions (solids and polyface meshes), So, they are useless for me. I know upgrading will fix SOME of the transpacial dimension problems... but that is why I upgraded to 2002 in the first place. I've lost the desire to continue upgrades for bug fixes. They don't fix bugs, they only shift them around for you to hunt for.

Joe Dunfee

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources