×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Integral Bridge

Integral Bridge

Integral Bridge

(OP)
Hi everyone,

I am very young to the bridge engineering and i may ask silly questions here.

What are the advantages of using an concrete integral bridge over other types of bridges??  I know corrosion prevention is a pretty good reason, but are there anymore?

What do you have to pay attention to design an integral bridge??

Thanks for help!

RE: Integral Bridge

Integral bridges have many more benefits as you had likely thought.  While I recommend that you visit the Bridge FAQ listed in this section for reference material I will also note a few of them.

First and foremost is the low maintenance and degradation of integral bridges.  Without a way for water and chemical deicers to enter onto the substructure it remains nearly as pristine as when it was first placed.

Bearings used with integtral bridges are significantly less costly since the load is transfered only partly through the actual girders.  Thus most bearings are simple 1/2" (13 mm) neoprene pads as opposed to steel plates with neoprene or even other all metal bearings.

Without expansion joints, seismic shelf space is not a concern.  One of the first lessons learned in the 1971 San Fernando Earthquake was the vulnerablility of expansion joint shelf space and the resulting span loss.

These are just a few, I'm sure there is more.

Regards,
Qshake

Eng-Tips Forums:Real Solutions for Real Problems Really Quick.

RE: Integral Bridge

Another potential advantage is continuity, even if only for LL.  The reduced mid-span moment may reduce your section and provide some cost savings.

RE: Integral Bridge

There is a good article here:   www.steel.org/infrastructure/bridges/integralabutm.pdf

If your bridge is on piles so that the piles can flex to take care of thermal movements integral bridges are the way to go.  They eliminate expansion devices and bearings that cause problems.  If your bridge is long the pavement at the ends could be damaged by the thermal movement.  Each state DOT seems to have its own preference on how long a bridge can have integral abutments.  Bridges up to 200’ are very commonly built with out joints.  Tennessee has a bridge over 1000 feet with out joints.

Qshakes comments above are excellent.  The only thing I would add is that if you are in a high seismic area you should check shear at the joint just below the girders.

RE: Integral Bridge

I'm doing some field and analytical studies of integral bridges, and the best thing i know of to answer your question is a publication from PCI: The State of the Art of Precast/Prestressed Integral Bridges. Covers all the bases, while very straightforward (<100 page). I got it for about $20 a couple years ago from pci, not sure how you might get it for less...

good luck!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources