Starting a 4500 hp motor while it was coasting down
Starting a 4500 hp motor while it was coasting down
(OP)
I work in a refinery. We recently inadvertently tripped a 12 kV circuit. The 12kV circuit was reclosed within 30 seconds. One of the loads on that circuit is a 4500 hp motor that is a driver for an air compressor. The motor has a breaker for a starter. The motor's breaker never opened during the outage. Its trip/close power is from the substation. Thus, one of the loads that was picked up as soon as the breaker was reclosed was the 4500 hp motor. When the tripped circuit was re-energized the motor was still coasting down. The motor's normallly runs at 1800 rpm. At the time the breaker was closed it had coasted down to 450 rpm. My questions are, should I change the motor control circuit so that upon loss of main power to the motor to trip the motor? If so/or not so why?





RE: Starting a 4500 hp motor while it was coasting down
1. Verify whether or not the motor was designed for a full voltage across its terminal start. If you do not have any soft or reduced voltage-starting arrangement, then it was.
No action needs to be taken.
2. If you happen to have a reduced voltage starting arrangement, then the situation needs to be rectified. The motor swithgear must open when there is a power outage or a deep voltage dip. This is done by the undervoltage protection/relay.
RE: Starting a 4500 hp motor while it was coasting down
It has been brought to my attention by a collegue of mine that it is possible in the case described that the motor (in generator mode) will have it's own induced voltage while coasting down due to it's own inertia. If the induced voltage from the motor is out of phase with the bus voltage (upon the upstream breaker being reclosed) the inrush current to the motor will be drastically higher than what the motor was designed for causing the motor stator to endure excessive energy than it's original design. This can ultimately damage the motor.
RE: Starting a 4500 hp motor while it was coasting down
I would agree that an undervoltage relay may be appropriate in order to ensure that the breaker doesn't remain closed indefinitely - you would want to have a controlled re-start when supply is restored. Also, any reclosing on the 12 kV circuit must either be delayed or check that the feeder voltage is zero, so that there is no possibility of out of phase closing while the motor terminal voltage is still decaying and above acceptable limits.
RE: Starting a 4500 hp motor while it was coasting down
There are lots of reasons to trip the motor on undervoltage:
#1 - Prevent huge starting surge due to simultaneous restart of multiple motors when the supply is reenergized.
#2 - Prevent possible personnel or equipment hazard due to motor starting unexpectedly when power is returned.
#3 - Prevent possible motor damage due to prolonged operation at reduced voltage (although thermal overloads should handle this pretty well anyway... undervoltage trip provides some redundancy).
#4 - Immediate restart of a large motor after tripping can be fairly severe duty since motor is already at operating temperature and has to withstand heating from a starting surge on top of that. I think NEMA requires motors to be designed for this but there is no need to subject the motor to this unless it is required.
There are probably a few more reasons.
Also might consider something of a delay in the response to prevent unwanted trips on momentary power interruptions.
RE: Starting a 4500 hp motor while it was coasting down
(NEMA standard only requires one start when initially at temp or two starts in succession).
RE: Starting a 4500 hp motor while it was coasting down
I found much more relevant info on that subject.
NEMA MG-1-1998R1, for large motors - section 20.34.1
"Slow Transfer Reclosing" - power interrupted for >1.5 times the "open circuit ac time constant". This is the recommended approach since it allows residual flux/voltage to decay to acceptable levels.
"Fast Transfer Reclosing" - power interrupted for <0.5 times the open circuit ac time constant. Voltage should not have drifted that far apart by this time.
Section 1.60.1 - "Open Circuit AC Time constant"
= (Xm+X2)/(2pi*f*r2) where Xm, X2, r2 are equivalent circuit parameters (per-phase). f power frequency.
So 3-10 cycles was the EPRI typical number. NEMA gives info on calcuating limits for a specific motor.
RE: Starting a 4500 hp motor while it was coasting down
"A fast transfer or reclosing is one which occurs within a time period shorter than 1.5 open circuit ac time constants. In such cases transfer or reclosure should be timed to occur when the difference in motor residual voltage and frequency and the incoming system voltage and frequency will not result in damaging transients...... it is recommended that the electromechanical interactions of the motor, driven equipment, and power system be studied for any system where fast transfer or reclosure is used"
Sorry I have left out about a paragraph that seemed irrelevant to me... getting a little tired of typing.
The bottom line is it seems clear they're recommending a study to see if the fast transfer/reclosure option will work. I'm not exactly clear on the word "should" in the 2nd sentence of quoted section. Are they saying that the user should apply phase-checking relays? Or are they saying that limiting the duration to <0.5*Tau "should" [is expected to] result in a situation where the voltages are still approximately in phase. My reading of EPRI was the latter interpretation.... but I suspect that's not what NEMA is saying.
RE: Starting a 4500 hp motor while it was coasting down
RE: Starting a 4500 hp motor while it was coasting down
By the way - I haven't figured out how those stars appear immediately after I post.
The reason that I'm making so many posts is that I don't proofread my posts until after they're posted, not that I'm trying to rack up stars !
RE: Starting a 4500 hp motor while it was coasting down
RE: Starting a 4500 hp motor while it was coasting down
From what I have read, I believe there is no danger as long as the duration of power interruption is greater than 1.5 open circuit ac time constants of the motor which is on the order of 10 cycles (regardless of the fact that the motor probably has not stopped spinning during that short time).
The nature of the transient toruqes have to do with the energy left in the electric/magnetic fields, not the energy left in the rotating inertia... and decay of the electric/magnetic energy is primarily influeced by electrical quantities (it would not be terrbily incorrect to assume that mechanical energy does not decay signficantly in the time frame in which the electrical/magnetic field energy decays substantially to zero). So again, from my perspective, the fact that the pump was still spinning is not really of any significance... only the duration of power interruption. I think this is born out by NEMA MG-1's recommended practice.
That's the way I see it from here. I'm interested to know if you disagree with any of my statements. No doubt I've been wrong quite a few times before.
RE: Starting a 4500 hp motor while it was coasting down
The NEMA requirements for slow transfer/reclose are based soley on the open circuit ac time constant which is computed from electrical motor parameters. Load inertia/load torque which affect the mechanical coastdown are conspicuosly absent. This helped me reach the conclusion that mechanical coast-down is irrelevant in determining the minimum alloweable duration of power interrutpion.
Also, the apparent contradiction between EPRI and NEMA and the ambiguities in NEMA which I noted in my 8/22/01 posts all center around fast-transfer reclosing. Today's discussion of minimum duration of power interrutpion is related to slow-transfer closing.... for which case the NEMA and EPRI guidance appear consistent and unambiguous.
RE: Starting a 4500 hp motor while it was coasting down
1. If this is a power to close and power to trip type breaker, consider a control power source from a UPS system in order for the under-voltage device to work. I need more info on equipment.
2. Consider installing a "lock-out" relay device.
3. Consider installing modern motor protection (SR-469 Multilin or like) for proper motor managing.
4. You didn't mention any effects this may have had on the compressor. Normally these motors start with the compressor un-loaded. Does your control scheme have an instant dump on power loss?
5. Other equipment like an oil skid that may provide lubrication for the motor and the compressor. Some motors in this size range will need a DC powered back-up pump just for lubrication during "coast-down".
RE: Starting a 4500 hp motor while it was coasting down
RE: Starting a 4500 hp motor while it was coasting down
As you say, jbartos, these motors are designed for across the line staring and this condition does not impose any higher duty. I don't believe that there will be any loss of motor life under these conditions.
RE: Starting a 4500 hp motor while it was coasting down
My questions are, should I change the motor control circuit so that upon loss of main power to the motor to trip the motor?
///Based on the above postings, standards, and studies it may be prudent to add recommended protection to the motor by inhibiting its start until its terminal voltage is in compliance with the manufacturer and standards recommendations.\\\
If so/or not so why?
///It is recommended by the standards, results of studies, and possibly by the manufacturer. However, the industry practice appears to be not so meticulous, when it comes to the squirrel cage induction motors.\\\
RE: Starting a 4500 hp motor while it was coasting down
Later on we talked about a different type of possible motor damage from high torques due to out-of-phase reclosing if the duration of the power interruption was too short (<1.5x open circuit ac time constant.) That is a different type of damage.
The two types of damage mentioned (#1 - thermal and #2 - high torque due to out of phase reclose) result from separate types of conditions and must be given separate consideration, although the protection might overlap (for example undervoltage trip protects against both scenario's).
RE: Starting a 4500 hp motor while it was coasting down
Protecting the motor is one thing to think about. You have to consider the inertia load on the motor and protect the equipent the motor is connected to. I have seen 5000lb rotating assemblies bent due to motor reenergization. I have also seen coupling bolts and keys sheared off. I work for a large equipment manufacturer and If we find out you have been doing rolling restarts your waranty is null and void. Typically if I see bolts sheared off on a coupling design with a service factor of 2.5X (most couplings are 1.5x) I start looking at the power source.
Chuck
RE: Starting a 4500 hp motor while it was coasting down
That apart, I think that you make things a little bit too easy for you Chuck. There needs to be a more detailed investigation - restarting an induction motor that has no soft-start equipment should be fully acceptable when power has been away for 30 seconds - even ten seconds will be OK since the rotor time constant seldom is more than a few seconds.
An undervoltage lock-out is always good and necessary in many cases. The guarantee question, however, should not be solved in such a hasty way.
Gunnar Englund
www.gke.org
RE: Starting a 4500 hp motor while it was coasting down
AS LONG AS THERE IS NO RESIDUAL VOLTAGE. Would someone please explain why this would be wrong.
RE: Starting a 4500 hp motor while it was coasting down
Typically, the voltage generated by the motor will decay in less than 1 second, it is a function of the rotor time constant and this varies from motor to motor. I expec that the new "High Eff" motors will have a longer time constant due to the lower rotor resistance.
Best regards,
Mark Empson
http://www.lmphotonics.com
RE: Starting a 4500 hp motor while it was coasting down
horsedragon,
You appear to be new, welcome to the forum. You were most likely unaware of the guidelines but just so you know, it is generally considered inappropriate to resurrect threads older than 6 months. What you can do if interested in discussing an issue like this is to start a new thread, then in your first message, reference the old thread by copying and pasting the "thread ID number" at the top of the page. This helps to avoid confusion.
For example, I can reference another similar thread on transition spike damage by finding that thread in another browser window, then copying and pasting that thread ID number into this message like this thread237-42958 . If you notice, it is highlighted and is a link to that old thread imbedded into this one. Now all the information from that old thread is readilly available for reference without cloggin up the new thread with old posts.
There are more tricks and guidlines available at the FAQ listed at the end of my signature line.
Again, welcome to the forum and enjoy!
"Our virtues and our failings are inseparable, like force and matter. When they separate, man is no more." Nikola Tesla
Member, P3
Read the Eng-Tips Site Policies at FAQ731-376