×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

4140 heat treating variation in rc

4140 heat treating variation in rc

4140 heat treating variation in rc

(OP)
We had 7/8" dia bar 4140h heat treated, 41-50 rc. the vendor could not get a consistent rc reading on the outside ,30-54. Why would this be. Also we machined some parts and got 41-54 rc readings. Why would this be? The vendor has also tried re-heat treating the bars with the same result on the o.d. when trying hardness test(varies 30-52). The ht process is vacuum / gas, not oil quench. We want to finish machine the bar stock at the blueprint rockwell call-out(41-50rc). We also want to hold the rc to with-in 5 points on the lower end, for consistant machining purposes.Could you suggest a fix to get this material in this range, preferably 42-47 rc. Why would the od be so varied?
Thanks
Jim

RE: 4140 heat treating variation in rc

The variation in hardness for the 4140H material could be caused by several variables;

1. decarburization during heat treatment OR

2. method of hardness testing


I would have a complete metallurgical analysis performed of a heat treated bar to evaluate the specific cause of hardness variability.

Hardness testing alone will not provide you with the root cause of the problem. It could be that the method of hardness testing is the cause of variability.

RE: 4140 heat treating variation in rc

(OP)
Could you go into more detail about decarburization & method of hardness testing and a solution. How thick would the decarb be ? How could the decarb be removed?
Have you seen this problem before? It has us scratching our heads. We though we just send the bars out for ht get them back certified to rc and machine. Why such a problem? I also have mill certs for the mat'l.

RE: 4140 heat treating variation in rc

I'm no expert, but I have used vacuum HT facilities over the years.  I think your problem lies with the quench rate.  Decarb is a non-issue in a vacuum furnace.  Has your vendor succesfully processed similar cross sections in the same material before?  A friend of mine had problems processing 4340 in a vacuum furnace with nitrogen as the atmosphere and quench.

RE: 4140 heat treating variation in rc

I really can't give you a solution until you find out what is causing the variability in hardness because it would be speculation on my part. I have seen where the furnace atmosphere was not purged correctly, resulting in local decarburization affects (removal of carbon from the surface of the part) that reduces hardness. Depending on exposure, the decarburization can be localized.

I have also seen where hardness testing was done incorrectly resulting in lower hardness values. The hardness testing should be performed by a qualified lab.

You need to work directly with your vendor or heat treater to resolve this problem. They should provide you with a metallurgical analysis report or at least request one as a customer. Also, I would verify who is performing the hardness testing and their test method.

RE: 4140 heat treating variation in rc

(OP)
Is this material salvagable, How would we get the correct rc reading from each bar, 4 ft lengths? Would the decarb need to be removed?
Is there anyone who has ran across this problem? How was it resolved?
Thanks,

Jim

RE: 4140 heat treating variation in rc

I concur with metengr regarding hardness testing.  This is frequently a problem, due to improper test set-up, poor calibration, etc.  Decarburization definitely produces the type of problems you describe, as does inadequate quenching.  Gas quenching can be quite tricky.  You need to have a proper metallurgical analysis performed.  The microstructure should be characterized in a location that measures low in hardness and in a location that measures high in hardness.

RE: 4140 heat treating variation in rc

Jim,
Decarb can be removed by machining which you have done.

Were hardness tests after machining performed by heat treater or others?  If the hardness tests before and after heat treat were done by the same facility, it would point to localized decarb since the lower readings increased after machining.

The large variation in hardness readings after machining suggests the possibility of alloy segregation.  This condition occurs during the steelmaking process and can be verified by metallurgical analysis which has already been suggested.

Jesus is THE life,
Leonard

RE: 4140 heat treating variation in rc

(OP)
The rc testing was performed by the heat treater and our selves. Thank you to all. I will keep you posted.

Jim

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources