×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Fixed Beam thermowells

Fixed Beam thermowells

Fixed Beam thermowells

(OP)
According to ASME PTC 19.3, for steam velocities >300 fps, a fixed beam type thermometer well is recommended. Can anyone provide a sketch or drawing of such a thermowell or simply explain how it differs from a standard tapered well?

RE: Fixed Beam thermowells

that advice is flawed especially so at high velocities. what are you trying to instrument?

RE: Fixed Beam thermowells

(OP)
I do not necessarily want to instrument anything at this time. I am preparing a spec. My client wishes all thermowells to be dimensioned in accordance with ASME PTC 19.3. The ASME standard mentions the fixed beam thermowell, which I and everyone else I asked, never heard of. Normally I would use a welded type of thermowell for high steam velocities.

Why do you think the recommendation in the ASME standard is flawed?

RE: Fixed Beam thermowells



It is a fixed beam design that extends across a pipe diameter and is supported at each end. it is the worst possible configuration for a temperature measurement, flow induced vibration issues, and thermal stresses.

High velocity designs are available but are rarely needed in the average process application.

PTC 19.3 may be revised, as thermowells satisfying its design criteria have failed. This is apparently the result of it being based on an incomplete and in some respects flawed, stress analysis.

The safest strategy is to use thermowells short enough to avoid flow induced resonance all together.

You might check with http://www.tappi.org/journals, the April 2002 issue. There are related articles in Chemical Engineering Mag. and in the Oil & Gas Journal about that time.

At 300 ft/s, accurate temperature measurement is a problem because of aerodynamic heating, what are you trying to measure?

RE: Fixed Beam thermowells

(OP)
I have high velocity (315 - 357 fps) superheated steam (HP, LP, HRH) temperature that has to be measured for a power plant.
How does one quantify the amount of aerodynamic heating?

RE: Fixed Beam thermowells

Aerodynamic heating is covered in a number of texts and generally requires empirical correction factors. Before you attempt to incorporate it in any spec you have to define what you mean by accurracy. My experience is that for power plant operations it won't be a concern.

We've covered the velocity ratings with a simple clause linked to PTC 19.3. It is safe for most steam applications but you have to comply with its ratings. Having said that 350 ft/s is a demanding service and you should be considering weld-in thermowells, with full penetration welds and u-dimensions less than an inch or so. To avoid sensor damage associated with the on-set of flow induced resonance you have to reduce the PTC velocity ratings of your well by more than half.

Good luck,

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources