×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

MIL-PRF-38201D

MIL-PRF-38201D

MIL-PRF-38201D

(OP)
We are dealing with an oxygen filler valve that calls out reliability testing at an Inspection Level II.  Which for our lot size, the sample size would be 50.  In the previous rev of MIL-PRF-38201D, which is MIL-V-38201C, the Inspection level is S-1, which would be a sample size of 3.  Our QAR (government rep) pointed this out and we are in need of some guidance as to how to prove the intent of the document. Any suggestions?

RE: MIL-PRF-38201D

Did you sign up to the new requirement without reading it?

TTFN

RE: MIL-PRF-38201D

(OP)
No, our company has been quite lax on conforming to specs called out in the contracts.  I have been here for about 18 months and an just now discovering all of these nonconformances to the specs.  We were testing to MIL-V-38201C, but I guess no one ever updated our test procedures when it changed to MIL-PRF-38201D. So now I am stuck with setting up this testing.

RE: MIL-PRF-38201D

My company has dealt with Uncle Sam for over 30 years.

I would really recommend you get ahold of your mil-specs before you quote.  

If you bid an item, you're effectively agreeing to their requirements on that item.

Langdon - is your firm ISO?  do you have a MIL-I-45208 plan in place?  Does your firm mostly quote non-government business?

Anyway, in this case, I would clear off a table, and lay out a copy of the contract, all the drawings cited in the contract, and all applicable specs called out in the contract and in any of the drawings.

Consider the following -
1) Drawings often contain notes that override mil-spec requirements.  If you have the latest revision of the drawing, (as cited in the contract), and it says something different than the mil-spec, roll with it.

2) Contract notes/details may override drawing notes or specs requirements.

So, regardless of what qty is described in the mil-prf-38201D, there is a possibility that you will have to test more, less, or even 100%.

"proving the intent" of a mil-spec is an odd concept to me...  Spec's are often confusing, read the applicable sections over a bunch of times and they start to make sense.

Keep in mind, the specs are demanding you answer a yes/no question - does the item meet it's requirements?

hth
-rob


Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources