×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Vacuum level VS Top pumparound rate

Vacuum level VS Top pumparound rate

Vacuum level VS Top pumparound rate

(OP)
What are the causes of loosing vacuum when increasing the top reflux rate in the vacuum bottoms stripper? Does it necessarily mean a liquid phase entrainment to the ejector system?

RE: Vacuum level VS Top pumparound rate

Some reasons I could think of:

1. If the net result is a cooler tower top, it might promote a new flash equilibrium behaviour. A cooler tower top would result in a smaller amount of liquid condensed in a pre-condenser. Thus less light ends are absorbed and the load to the ejectors increases causing a pressure rise.

2. If the increased p.a. flow rate involves more heater firing to maintain the temperature profile, one may get additional cracking and consequently overloaded ejectors.

3. Do you have also a side GO stripper that may become destabilized by the larger sudden p.a. withdrawal ?

Kindly comment.

RE: Vacuum level VS Top pumparound rate

(OP)
1. That could be one of the possible reasons, but I doubt somehow; the quantity of stripping steam is constant, and we have this kind of problem only when processing lighter crude. It's interesting that first (main) column doesn't suffer loss of vacuum at all.
2. No automatic temperature control on bottoms. Heater outlet temperature (when processing light crude) is 385C.
3. No, there's no side GO stripper. Only second column, which is used for bottoms' stripping, instead of quenching vacuum residue in a single-stage VDU.


Could it be possible that too much HVGO is recovered and "burped" into the ejector system? I didn't notice any significant increase of HVGO level in the side-draw pan.


RE: Vacuum level VS Top pumparound rate

(OP)
I've forgot to mention: this lighter crude is paraffinic. Maybe we have pour point problem and difficult drainage from the booster condensers?

RE: Vacuum level VS Top pumparound rate

I think of it as you have more liquid pump around you will have more pressure drop across that section of the column section, check you dp across the column sections with a pressure survey.

Lieberman books mentioned similar case of vacuum loss with a precondenser in the top.

RE: Vacuum level VS Top pumparound rate

(OP)
hmmm...
well, i guess it would be OK if vacuum loss with increasing pumparound rate was 1-2 mmHg; but in my plant this deltaP goes up to 40mmHg. It's interesting that we can't hold design temperature for stripper's top (80C) - current temperature is 125C and vacuum is 725mmHg. When I increase the stripped HVGO pumparound rate (or lower its return temperature through bypass controller - in order to maintain 80C), vacuum starts to fall.
Anyway, thank you, alsayed.
Maybe I'm too young to think about all these things, or maybe I need a long vacation in Rio De Janeiro:)

siNceReLLy,
manatmos

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources