×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Burden Rate

Burden Rate

Burden Rate

(OP)
Is it correct to divide the sum of the manufactoring cost (Machines, tools, energy, etc.) by the total hours of all the workers? Or do you divide by the total hours of just one worker?

RE: Burden Rate

What are you trying to set the burden rate to?  Is it to a facility or to a work center (specific machine)?

RE: Burden Rate

In my experience most large manufacturing facilities use between 35-40% of the labor rate for each emloyee involved in the study.  Most studies are in cost centers or value streams.

RE: Burden Rate

Depends on what you are trying to do.  

A typical exercise would allocate the manufacturing burden across all the manufacturing labor, but, you can allocate it across all the workers, since that would allow you to spread the engineering burdens across all the workers as well and thereby come up with a lower engineering rate.

TTFN

RE: Burden Rate

As there are many ways of calculating or estimating burden, I would recommend starting by talking with the accounting group to see how they calculate/record it for reporting/expensing purposes.  In that way, you have a management recognized value to work from.

Regards,

RE: Burden Rate

Burden rate for a machine or a division would use all the direct labor costs excluding G&A for that machine or Division. While engineers probably taught accountants how and why life-cycle and other total cost principles were needed..in today's industry there is no way "an engineer" can be familiar with the company's total cost structure to enable him/her to make informed decisons about activity based costing. In a perfect world, the engineer would provide the basis for all activity costing and the accontants would then add layers as appropriate. Today, Enron-accounting procedures require the obfuscation of all practicality and direct linkage to a cost or profit center. We can thank our tax code and foreign competition for worsening the problem that started with simple dishonesty.

Jack Painter
Being audited is a lot more fun than auditing

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources