×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Time history data manipulation

Time history data manipulation

Time history data manipulation

(OP)
Dear all

I have some time-history data (time-acceleration) from an accelerometer placed on an engine block. Using this data I'd like to carry out an FE Harmonic analysis, however to do this I need to convert the time-accel data to freq-accel to identify the dominant frequencies and magnitudes. This will then be my input for the harmonic analysis. The problem is that I do not have software available to FFT the data to get freq-accel, and was thinking of using the RESP function in ANSYS to do this conversion instead, which generates a response spectrum from time-history data. I plan to increase the damping level in the RESP function to a super-critical level (which would give no amplification) but would give the response basically to a rigid-body motion. Would this RESP be equivalent carrying out an FFT on the data?

Many thanks.

RE: Time history data manipulation

Do you have Microsoft Excel? That has an FFT function. There are plenty of freeware/shareware programs that will do it too.

M

--
Dr Michael F Platten

RE: Time history data manipulation

(OP)
Thanks, Michael.

Couple of quick questions:

- have you used the FFT function in Excel? is it ok?
- can you point me to these freeware/shareware programs you mention, please.

Cheers,

-- drej --

RE: Time history data manipulation

google "octave" and "scilab" . Both are freeware math software with fft functions. Ocvtave is a great Matlab clone. possible problem with the excel fft is that it's limited to 4096 points.

Best regards

finnigan

RE: Time history data manipulation

(OP)
Thanks for all your input on this.

One small point: does anyone find that scaling of the FFT, from software-to-software, is an absolute nightmare? I tried three different FFT software packages, all of which successfully identified my dominant frequencies, but all gave different magnitudes (without explanation). I know this is down to scaling, but am yet to hear a plausible explanation. And in general, the FFT magnitudes were well below the maximums in my time-history.

Cheers,

-- drej --

RE: Time history data manipulation

There are numerous conventions for representing FFTs.

FFTs can be displayed as magnitude and phase.  FFTs can also be displayed as real and imaginary.

The FFT magnitude is symmetric about the Nyquist frequency, which is one-half the sample rate.

An FFT is usually shown extending up to the Nyquist frequency, but it could be displayed up to the sample rate frequency.

Furthermore, FFTs can give good representations of sine vibration amplitude.  However, FFTs are poor at representing random vibration amplitude.  The reason is that the amplitude depends on the frequency increment, which depends on the duration.  

Random vibration is best represented by a power spectral density.

Aliasing and leakage errors are also concerns.

In addition, the classical FFT is based on 2^n points where n is an integer.

For example, an FFT could be calculated for 8192 points or 16384 points.  Now assume a time history with 10,000 points.  Either zero-padding or truncation would be required to perform an FFT.

Tom Irvine
www.vibrationdata.com

RE: Time history data manipulation

drej:
Your different magnitudes might well come from the different types of windowing used by the different software packages,  or as tomirvine suggested,  because of differences in analysis block size.
But you're most likely simply interested in the dominant frequencies and their relative magnitudes, aren't you?

Anyway, try converting your data to a .wav file and "playing" it back through an acoustic software package like CoolEdit 97,  a nice piece of freeware that will do FFT's and let you experiment with different analysis block sizes.
Have fun!
 - Robert

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources