×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Spreader Beam Question

Spreader Beam Question

Spreader Beam Question

(OP)
In the paper, "Design and Construction of Lifting Beams" by David T. Ricker, the example only checks the beam for bending.  Shouldn't compression also be considered in the design since there is a horizontal force component from the resultant forces on the top lugs?  

RE: Spreader Beam Question

I'm not familar with the design source, but have seen plently of spreader beams used in various pick configurations.  

I would definitely consider the axial load if I could assure myself that it has a load path.

Also please note that many steel sections used in these applications are very robust.  Losing a load at any time is unthinkable, but when a beam/girder is part of a building it has some redundancy.  While its in the air, that picking rig is the only thing between it and the ironworking crew.

Regards,
Qshake

Eng-Tips Forums:Real Solutions for Real Problems Really Quick.

RE: Spreader Beam Question

Yes, axial loads must be considered too. I look at factors of safety associated with rigging. They are on the order of 5.

RE: Spreader Beam Question

(OP)
Before I started reading the paper I mentioned in my first post, I had an idea of the forces that would have to be accounted for in the design.  Basically design as a beam column and maybe torsion if applicable.  But as I read through the paper and followed the example, the author only takes flexure into account when sizing the member.  I was hoping some others have read the paper and could explain why the axial force produced by the resultant force on the top two lugs was not considered.  

RE: Spreader Beam Question

I've designed some spreaders and I have taken into account the axial force, also consider the axial force is eccentric as it is being applied to the top of the beam through the lugs, not at its centroid like a gravity column. You now have bending, axial compressiona and a Pdelta from the eccentric axial load.

RE: Spreader Beam Question

A few comments on the design of spreader beams:

-The axial force needs to be accounted for in one's design (as stated by others who have responded to this post)

-Use extreme care when selecting the section to be used for the beam.  Give consideration to lateral stability of the beam.  I have often used square or round tubes, as the sections tend to be superior to W sections for l/t buckling.

RE: Spreader Beam Question

CTW,

You may want to pass this question on to the AISC Steel Solutions Center. He's written several AISC publications.

www.aisc.org

RE: Spreader Beam Question

(OP)
Good idea.  I'll do that.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources