×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

SE vs SW for pressure vessel detailing ?

SE vs SW for pressure vessel detailing ?

SE vs SW for pressure vessel detailing ?

(OP)
I currently have Inventor 8, SW 2004, and SE 14 demo loaded to compare for suitability for detailing tanks and pressure vessels. After taking 2 Inventor classes it appears to be lacking in areas like precise placement of parts in assembly mode, (ie precise rotating of a nozzle 15 degrees before mating to a shell or dished head). SW seems to have a similar user friendly interface.

SE seems to have more precise control in a number of areas, but be less intuitive and user friendly initially. Fewer publications and training sources available as well as a higher initial cost. I am trying to determine if SW is sufficient for our needs as we already have one seat and one individual trained, or whether SE has features to justify the higher cost and learning curve.

We have hit some snags with SW  concerning nozzle placement and projection relative to the surface of a torispherical head that keeps us using 2D for now. For example in 2D AutoCad you can easily project 6" from the surface of a sphere at a given radius parallel to the vessel C/L to determine pipe length, this is more difficult in SW requiring a 2D layout to work backwards and precisely offset a plane to mate the nozzle to. I have seen demonstrations of vessels detailed in SE as well as received drawings from a company using SE for vessel detailing. Tryllium bases their product on the a server based SE solution. Still trying to determine which package would provide best overall value. It appears SE will do what we need given enough $ and training. Still trying to determine if SW will also meet our needs. Running out of time on my 2nd 30 day evaluation of SE however and just scratched the surface. I am concerned that there are so few 3rd party books and no SE training in a larger city such as Indianapolis. SW excels in this area.

 Would appreciate any feedback from individuals actually using SE or SW to detail    tanks or pressure vessels.

RE: SE vs SW for pressure vessel detailing ?

You should also post this thread in the SW forum ... but be prepared for some heavy "we can do this better" from both sides of the fence.

From your description it sounds like a fairly simple alignment which can be controlled by a skeleton or layout sketch & planes, multiple Configurations of which could in turn be controlled by a Design Table (Excel spreadsheet). I don't understand what you mean by "work backwards" when referring to a sketch though.

I'm sure both SW & SE will meet your needs but will employ different methods to reach the same goal.

from (the City of) Barrie, Ontario.

Everyone has a photographic memory. Some just don't have film.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources