×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Packing Densty
2

Packing Densty

Packing Densty

(OP)
Is there a table or formula available to calculate the relative packing density of spherical particles based on the particle size?  (i.e.  What is the density of a cubic foot of lead shot in the various shot sizes?)

RE: Packing Densty

Here is one way to solve this:

1) Establish a reference volume (you chose 1 foot3)

Vref = 1 foot3 = 0.028 m3

2) Calculate the volume of a unit cell of the spheres with radius r

Vunit = (2√2r)3

3) Calculate the actual volume of spheres

Vsphere = 0.74 Vunit

4) Calculate mass of spheres

msphere = ρmat Vsphere

where ρmat = mass density of sphere material

5) Calculate reference density

ρref = msphere ÷ Vref

Regards,

Cory

Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.

RE: Packing Densty

There is whole field (packing of materials) of mathematics based on your question.  

I did have some information on the apparent density of iron, steel, and lead shot of the same size, big point.  I'll look for it.  It was for working with radiation shielding.
I've seen articles on the apparent packing density of iron and lead shot in gun and reloading magazines.

RE: Packing Densty

Are you talking about randomly packed spheres or carefully packed ones?

Are you talking about a mixture of different sizes, or just one size?

Is the size of the sphere significant in comparison with the size of the container?

Is elasticity important?

The direct answer to your initial query is that the packing density is invariant with the size of the sphere in the simplest case.

Cheers

Greg Locock

RE: Packing Densty

(OP)
Thanks Cory, Syd & Greg.

The spheres are commercial lead shot, the application is ballasting a boat.  The shot is poured randomly into the keel and bilge area, then stabilized with polyester resin.
Several years ago I weighed 2.5 quarts of the stuff we had on hand at the time, and calculated a density of 440 pounds per cubic foot.

Having seen some other published numbers for the density of generic lead shot, I'd like to be able to do a reality check on the various numbers to see which are likely to be the most correct.

(For anybody out there who needs to ballast something, check out the copper jacketed bullet scrap from ammo manufacturers.  It weighs in at 400 pounds per cu ft.)

RE: Packing Densty

You'll get a denser ballast if you mix different shot sizes.  The small ones fill in the gaps.

RE: Packing Densty

I find figures of around 64% for randomly packed hard identical spheres (with no bridging), and 77.8% for the best possible arrangement.

The worst is 5.5% but I have no idea how they define that!

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SpherePacking.html for more references than you can shake a stick at.

Cheers

Greg Locock

RE: Packing Densty


Mathworld: wow

   (Thanks for the link)

Steven Fahey, CET
"Simplicate, and add more lightness" - Bill Stout

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources