×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

MASONRY WALL JAMBS

MASONRY WALL JAMBS

MASONRY WALL JAMBS

(OP)
When designing a masonry wall jamb at a door or window opening can you use the effective width in compression as defined in ACI530 (least of c/c bar spacing, six time wall thickness, or 72”) or should it logically be half that?

Does anyone else find that this tends to be a weak link in a masonry wall system particularly if the openings are large and the walls are tall?  I’ve been using concrete columns or 12” thick jambs often on large overhead doors.

RE: MASONRY WALL JAMBS

I think you could prove that the effective width is 6t by using the horizontal joint reinforcement to transfer the load from the opening back into the wall.  However, I typically reinforce the first one, two or three cores at opening jambs for the additional wind load coming off the opening.  Remember that the reinforcing in the first core adjacent to the opening is ineffective because it will stop below the lintel bearing.

DaveAtkins

RE: MASONRY WALL JAMBS

(OP)
Thanks Dave, but
All to often the 6t is superceded by tighter reinf. spacing, generally 48" oc, cutting the effective compressive width to 28".  It's been difficult to explain to architects that the maximum opening size must be less than the typical bar spacing because of the reduction of nearly half the wall section spanning vertically.

Yeah, I specify to grout and reinf. multiple jamb cores where it works but still have difficulty with large openings.

I should mention that most of my work is in the high wind areas of south florida.  We use the hollow precast lintels with notched bearings to allow the reinforcment to pass thru the first core.

RE: MASONRY WALL JAMBS

I have a couple of ideas.  First, try using two bars in each core, to increase "d".  Second, try using the ultimate strength method in the IBC.  This will almost surely give you better results.

DaveAtkins

RE: MASONRY WALL JAMBS

ACI 2.1.7.1 Page C-18 Effective bearing is BP width + 4t. See also Figure 2.1-15 on CC-29. This is for running bond.

The c.c. spacing between bars or 72" should be referring to the maximum effective wall width per bar. That means, the maximum effective flange width for compression corresponding to a bar at yeild, for beam action.

These are two diffent issues.

The effective jamb width should be the BP + 4t. This should be the maximum design width also for bending for wind jamb, unless the jamb as mentioned earlier is broken or discontinuous at the lintel bearing.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources