×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

slab on grade design for rack loads

slab on grade design for rack loads

slab on grade design for rack loads

(OP)
Designing slab on grade to support significant rack loads (15000# per post) and using PCA charts to design it appears as though a plain slab is off the chart (when considering 2 adjacent racks back to back will give 2-15000# post loads only 8" apart). Using finite element analysis software (ROBOT) we have determined the max moment to be 40kN-m. Which lends to a 10" slab with 15M @ 12" o.c. E.W top and bottom or 20M @ 10" o.c. ea. way at centre of slab.  This seems like a very significant slab, especially to the ears of the client, but it is what it is!
Does anyone have experience with this type of design with respect to this reinf. and thickness?
Secondly, if I go with 20M @ 10" oc. I will sawcut at about 12'-6" o.c. ea way across the slab, but if we elect to use 15M top and bottom, can I elminate the sawcutting all together? (can't sawcut with only 2" cover). Any experience on what option would be best with respect to cost and performanc?

Thanks in advance for any thoughts.

RE: slab on grade design for rack loads

It would appear that you are analyzing the slab as a beam with a finite width.  In this case, for a fully supported slab on grade, punching shear will likely control the design.  Check the shear and see what thickness values you'll get.  Generally no reinforcement is needed for this and I would expect a slab thickness in the 8-inch range.  Check it by an elastic layer analysis (such as for a pavement).  If shear value is marginal, use a baseplate to spread the contact area and thus increase the shear area.

**Need Professional Development Hours / Continuing Education ??
**Try this course...
http://pdhonline.org/cgi-bin/quiz/courses/courselist.cg...

RE: slab on grade design for rack loads

(OP)
I agree punching shear is important and should be checked, but  there will also bending stresses within the slab, especially on a subgrade with k=100pci and significant post loads close together. As a result with the maximum bending stresses created I am needing a slab of this depth and at this depth punching shear is ok.

With reference to my second question, placement of control joints and construction joints with respect to rack supports is difficult as owners want the flexibility to move racking as desired. Bars through contraction joints should be kept to a minimum but at the same time by reducing the bars across a joint will reduce the moment capacity near the joints. As a result I would like to keep the jointing to a minimum. Joint spacings for plain slabs on grade is readily available, but what about with a reinforced slab?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources