×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Hydraulic Analysis

Hydraulic Analysis

Hydraulic Analysis

(OP)
Here is my situation:
Everything I can find in my hydraulics books from college show that losses are added to the Total Energy Grade, EGL.  Then the velocity head is subtracted from that value to obtain the hydraulic grade elevation.  This, in turn, produces a sloping HGL across a structure if there is a change in pipe diameter.  This is the way I have been analyzing storm drains since I got out of college.  HEC-22 shows that losses are added to the downstream HGL then the pipe velocity head is added to obtain the upstream EGL.  So the HGL and EGL slopes are not parallel in a run of pipe.  Therefore, the velocity in that pipe is now dynamic.

Has anyone ever encountered this situation?  What is the correct approach for summing head losses in a system?  Am I just missing something?

RE: Hydraulic Analysis

Are we discussing full or part full pipe flow.

RE: Hydraulic Analysis

(OP)
My topic is for pressure flow, and should somewhat be the same for free flow.

RE: Hydraulic Analysis

I am not sure I understand your problem. For full pipe flow the HGL is always sloping and is parallel to the EGL. At a change in diameter there is a step in both the HGL and EGL. The step in the EGL is equal to the head loss across the structure.  The HGL is derived from the EGL - V^2/2g (SI units). (This is assuming by HGL we mean the EGL - velocity head.

HEC-22 may add the losses at the end of a section for convenience - in general we are interested only in the total loss and flow.

For free surface flow the HGL is only parallel to the EGL when the flow is at normal depth. Structures cause backwaters and drawdown which can have affects over long lengths where HGL is not parallel  to EGL.

Brian

RE: Hydraulic Analysis

(OP)
Bris, you are correct.  That is the way I was taught but this is what I ran into:

First, I will paraphrase from HEC22;

at a structure, ie manhole, add the losses to the downstream energy grade then subtract the outlet pipe vepocity head to get HGL.  Next step is to add pipe losses to HGL then add the upstream pipe velocity head to get the upstream EGL.

When you do this then work backwards the EGL at the outlet of the upstream pipe can be lower than the one calculated at the upstream end of the structure.  This is the problem i ran into.  I normally add all losses to EGL then subtract the velocity head to get the HGL. If you run up the system using the EGL you will get different values of HGL at the upstream end of structures.

I was just wondering if anyone else has run into this?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources