×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Steel/Wood Combined Beam
8

Steel/Wood Combined Beam

Steel/Wood Combined Beam

(OP)
I have to design a beam that must span what a 2-2x12 beam could handle.  How do I calculate what a 2-2x6 beam w/ a 1/4" steel plate sandwhiched in the middle can support.  Thanks for the help in advance.

Devon

RE: Steel/Wood Combined Beam

Ratio the flitch plate EI to the beam EI and obtain the new section properties.  Reference WOOD: ENGINEERING DESIGN CONCEPTS published by Materiels Education Council for further info.

RE: Steel/Wood Combined Beam

Simple 10 second answer - See if the plate by itself can handle the load.  Then the wood is just along for the ride.
Otherwise, transformed properties.....

RE: Steel/Wood Combined Beam

Be sure to check the wood for shear at the supports. While the steel plate will resist most of the moment, it is typically of little value for shear (the steel's contact bearing area, if any, is very small).
See the following thread for a similar discussion: Thread507-85244

RE: Steel/Wood Combined Beam

Check deflection too.  That's pretty shallow even for steel.  

As long as you have enough bolts over your support to transfer the steel reaction to the wood, you could use the wood bearing area without having to take the full shear of the combined section in the wood.

RE: Steel/Wood Combined Beam

I would not recommend using anything less than 2x8 for flitch beams.  With 2x6's , realistically, the bolts will be in line.  You won't be able to propperly transfer the forces.  

If you need to use a 2x6 flitch, then I would not count on the wood and design the plate to resist the full load.  

RE: Steel/Wood Combined Beam

i agree if you need a 6" depth the bolting will be difficult to develop bolting. as stated ealier i usually design the steel to take the whole load. the wood is just bracing.

be careful with how you design the bolts. you have use the bolts in the center of the span to transfer the force into the plate from the wood. don't forget the plate is usually not flush top with the bottom of the joist and the steel does not supply adequate bearing area for the joists. you then have to transfer the shear back into the wood at the support. i usually try to transfer the shear back in within d of the support. this allows you to transmit a greater shear into the supprt then the beam's capacity. as a side note i understand the 2002(?) NDS has essentially eliminated the exemption for point loads within d of the support. however it seams to be a logical way to do things that has worked for years   

RE: Steel/Wood Combined Beam

Check out "Better Header", a manufacturer of flitch plate headers.  Their catalog sizes their products for span and live load

RE: Steel/Wood Combined Beam

2
Typically the steel is undersided so first instance the load is taken by the timbers, the calculated proportion then being transferred from the timbers to the plate by the bolts over the main span, and then transferred back from the plate to the timbers at the bearings.  The two guides below agree with 8" min size.

You MUST ensure that any flitch beam is provided with adequate bearing, fastening methods, and lateral restraint.

See:
http://www.destefanoassociates.com/tech/flitch.pdf
http://www.toolbase.org/docs/MainNav/WoodFrameConstruction/2947_flitchplate.pdf


RE: Steel/Wood Combined Beam

Here is another idea...for what it is worth. How about taking a 1 3/4" x 11 7/8" microlam and cut it in half? I think that (2) 1 3/4" x 5 7/8" microlams (with higher strength) might be close in strength to what (2) 2 x 12's gave you. You will have to check the resulting strength and deflections.

RE: Steel/Wood Combined Beam

(OP)
jike - microlams would not work - by cutting in half you are losing more than half of the strength of the microlam.  Thanks

RE: Steel/Wood Combined Beam

DYork -
 My mistake. You are correct. You would need 4 of the mini-microlams 1 3/4 x 5 7/8 to equate to the (2) 2 x 12's. It still might be an easier option if you can live with the width.

RE: Steel/Wood Combined Beam

Equivalent section charactistics are generally designed for bending stress and then checked for shear and deflection.  Cutting does not decrease strength (ignoring size factors) it decreases section modulus.

Using allowable (permissible) stress design, the required elastic section modulus, Z, is found by dividing the maximum bending moment by the adjusted allowable bending stress, Fb. As we all should know Z is a function of height squared and width.  You can not use an area fuction, but must use Fb * Z equivalancy.

Live load deflection = 5/384 [wL / (EI)] gives us the functional inverse realtionship E * I

RE: Steel/Wood Combined Beam

A quick aside - I think Elastic section modulus is typically noted as "S", while Plastic section modulus is noted as "Z".

RE: Steel/Wood Combined Beam

yes I agree
S=section modulus
must have had a senior moment...

RE: Steel/Wood Combined Beam

If width is not a problem, You may want to consider (2) 5" or 6" Channels back to back.  The webs are easier to drill and the flanges greatly increase the stiffness compared to the same weight plate.

How about a W6 steel beam with wood nailers and hangers?  Leave a 1/4" space above the top flange to prevent a lump in the floor when the joists shrink.

Check the deflection.  I recommend span/480

RE: Steel/Wood Combined Beam

(OP)
Bad choice of words - did not mean the strength charecteristics of the microlam.

RE: Steel/Wood Combined Beam

should have been
Live load deflection = 5/384*[w(L**4) / (EI)]

RE: Steel/Wood Combined Beam

Another thing you could look at is welding a 3" wide plate along the bottom of the vertical web plate to make a "T" shape.  Then the steel member becomes much stiffer and the steel can bear directly on the supports.

RE: Steel/Wood Combined Beam

Just a thought.....

Can you provide additional support elsewhere?  i.e. breaking up the spans of the joists framing into this beam with intermediate supports?  Then you may be able to reduce the req'd size.

If there happens to be a wall above the beam, in the past, I've cut into the wall 1/2" depth and used a single microlam with simpson tension straps wrapping the beam below to carry the loads.

Chip

RE: Steel/Wood Combined Beam

I ratioed the E for steel to the E for wood 29/1.8=16.1, so the 1/4" steel plate is equivalent to a 4x6 board. Verify the bearing stress of the steel plate if on a timber support, the flinch plate ought to be connected securely to the wood boardss on each side, to create loading on a single beam and to stabilize buckling of the steel plate.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources