Thoughts on FEA consulting services
Thoughts on FEA consulting services
(OP)
Hi all.
My question is more of a business question than a technical one. Living in Montreal, Canada, there are only a handful of engineering consulting companies that provide FEA capability.
Is it reasonable to assume that if we offer linear static analysis as a service, that this is a viable business, or must we be able to provide nonlinear static, and dynamic analysis, large deformations, etc.?
My guess is that we MUST provide the advanced analyses (with the related high costs, etc) to be successful. Although this also calls for hiring highly skilled personnel, etc...
Any thoughts?
tg
My question is more of a business question than a technical one. Living in Montreal, Canada, there are only a handful of engineering consulting companies that provide FEA capability.
Is it reasonable to assume that if we offer linear static analysis as a service, that this is a viable business, or must we be able to provide nonlinear static, and dynamic analysis, large deformations, etc.?
My guess is that we MUST provide the advanced analyses (with the related high costs, etc) to be successful. Although this also calls for hiring highly skilled personnel, etc...
Any thoughts?
tg





RE: Thoughts on FEA consulting services
starting a consulting busines is complex from lots of viewpoints, and there are lots of questions to answer.......what i have to say is fairly simple and dosen't nearly address all the issues. i will try very hard not to go on for hours.....
also keep in mind that you do state how many people are in with you, what your long term goals are, what risks you are ready to take etc etc etc etc
that aside..... i would say the smart way to start is to bootstrap your way up, DO NOT invest in people, equipment office space etc etc and then go out and try to find work....that's doomed to failure (very quickly). your most likely first job will 95% probably come from some person you know inside a company or a company that is familiar with you and your work and is happy with it and is ready to farm out work.
be prepared to be out of work and income for 3 months a year (possibly 3 consecutive months).
recognize that you have to pay whatever types of insurance you want, and set up your own retirement fund.
when you are "your own boss" (i tried not to smile) , you are also the cleaning lady, the computer/fax/printer repair person, the software evaluator/purchaser, the supply room man, the sales office, customer service, the emergency computer crash recovery team etc etc etc (and of course none of these activities are billable and cannot impact your schedule)
it goes on and on....my main point i guess is that consulting, or contracting successfully from your own office is not something to jump into blindly.... there are some good books on startup business... well worth browsing the shelves and buying.
but to get back to your basic question about static analysis, etc...... when a customer asks "can you guys .....?" you very confidently answer "we sure can and we'd love the job (whatever it was)". then on your way home, swing buy the bookstore and spend all night learning about what it is you just signed up to do.
and of course...loose the concept of 8AM to 5PM ....it means nothing anymore, nor do weekends.
good luck
daveleo
RE: Thoughts on FEA consulting services
Any suggestions for titles?
Cheers
Greg Locock
RE: Thoughts on FEA consulting services
your joking of course...you dont seriouly think i suggested learning non-linear FEA overnight.
trainguy asked a business question and that is how i answered it.... as a startup business question.
i was encouraging trainguy to be aggressive when negotiating for work....lots of times, in order to open new business doors and grow what you can offer customers, you need to take risks about what you can succeed at. that may be the biggest factor in having a successful "startup transient" ..... if you wait for a customer who will offer you technical work you are comfortable with, your business could very well go broke before that work finds you.
thats what i meant by my remark "what risks are you willing to take".
however ...... like all free advice you find on the internet, my advice is expendable, thats for sure.
daveleo
RE: Thoughts on FEA consulting services
corus
RE: Thoughts on FEA consulting services
Some companies are happy to waste their money on analysis that is more complex than you need. This may be because the person responsible for outsourcing the work lacks understanding of the problem.
Now if you challenge your client’s judgement then you will surely lose the work. On the other hand if you blindly agree to do all types of analysis then you are offering a poor value service and will eventually lose your clients.
Maybe you could price up the job exactly as requested and throw in a cheaper way of doing it as an alternative. Just having the capability to do some non-linear work will probably win you extra linear static work.
If your client’s perceive you to be an expert in your field then you are one!
RE: Thoughts on FEA consulting services
Just a clarification: I am already a part owner in a small design engineering firm mostly for transportation equipment, but due to slow business, we are exploring the FEA arena. We have used contract FEA personnel before and supervised them, but my goal here is to have in-house FEA capability to take on all types of work, not just railway stuff!
I have a vision of a full room (maybe 6-8 analysts) of employees cranking out FEA for many industries and projects. I'm just not sure if they'll all need to be PH.D's in structural mechanics or just engineers out of a Bachelor's degree doing linear static.
Or, I could just start investing in Real Estate...
tg
RE: Thoughts on FEA consulting services
they'll all do not need to be PH.D's in structural mechanics . They should have masters degree in structural mechanics with at least 2 courses in FEA with grades B or better and minimum of 4 years of AFTER master degree graduation experience with FEA structural analysis.
RE: Thoughts on FEA consulting services
What is your unbiased assessment of your ability to compete with the other companies and with the internal resources of your customers? How will you keep your FEA guru busy during slack times?
TTFN
RE: Thoughts on FEA consulting services
Cheers
Greg Locock
RE: Thoughts on FEA consulting services
corus
RE: Thoughts on FEA consulting services
Many FEA analyst, use commercial codes just as a black box, they don't know what is behind of every assumption. Today, all FEA soft wares represent very nice colour results (Garbage in Garbage out!).
I am agree with you and I think Master degree graduates usually have basic FEA knowledge. However, B.Sc guys need more training to be familiar with FEA.
Many B.Sc guys are good FEA analyst too. Because, they learned things by experience (not from theoretical aspects).
Cheers
feajob
RE: Thoughts on FEA consulting services
I agree. This is the way I see it. Most (not all) engineers with the PHD spend so much time on theory and very little time with applied practical situations. Most (not all) engineers with BS do not have enough theoratical background for the assumtions that they make for practical situations. However most (not all) engineers with MS in structural mechanics usually are proficient with theoratical and practical (if they have the experience) situations.
RE: Thoughts on FEA consulting services
Some people are very good at passing exams but are lousy at solving problems in the real world.
I once got rejected for a job application because I expressed strong opinions on the value of physical correlation of FEA results with testing. My interviewer was looking for someone who could do it all with FEA alone. The company was full of ‘mad professor’ types.
My colleagues sometimes think I’m talking myself out of a job when I suggest that it is often quicker, cheaper and more reliable to do a physical test than a very complex FEA calculation.
RE: Thoughts on FEA consulting services
I have once seen a 200 page report for designing a Pylon for a a very famous fighter aircraft all done by hand using plastic analysis.
For airborne systems it is mandatory to actually test all products according to MIL-A-8591H Title: AIRBORNE STORES, SUSPENSION EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT-STORE INTERFACE (CARRIAGE PHASE); GENERAL DESIGN CRITERIA FOR.
I once seen a phrase that sums it all "Is your finite element is actaully a Finite Elephant?" or someting close to it...
I believe that to be a good FEA proffesional you need to have even a better theoretical knowledge of elasticity, plasticity and structural analysis, otherwise your finite element may become a "Finite Elephant" and you could get nonesense from it.
If you are in a bussiness that demands a very high factor of safety you may do not need to test it but at the same time you surely do not need FEA. FEA is an invaluable tool where every extra weight is crucial such as in the aerospace industry. However, you still have to prove it by an actual test because FEA is still only an approximattion tool and tools operated by humans may be wrong.
RE: Thoughts on FEA consulting services
This situation has arisen largely due to the ease with which models and their boundary conditions can be generated by most pre-processors. And, with the advent of FEA embedded systems within most CAD products the situation is getting worse! I have seen CAD jockeys perform FEA using boundary conditions that were nothing short of ludicrous.
Recently I read an article written by the CEO of a leading FEA vendor for embedded systems advocating that FEA can now be performed by NON-ENGINEERS because it so easy to do !
RE: Thoughts on FEA consulting services
If you are a poor engineer then FEA is still easy to do but you won't improve your product.
RE: Thoughts on FEA consulting services
Unfortunately I also see engineers producing hand calculation that make ludricous assumptions in order to simplify a complex situation, that should have been assessed using FEA, down to a single equation, and then factored the result, just to be safe. I think it is the case that when asked what the value of Pi was, the mathematician said it was an irrational number and incalcuable, the physicist said it was about 3.14, and the stress engineer said it was less than 4, but let's call it 50.
corus
RE: Thoughts on FEA consulting services
Why don't you consider getting some CAD work, construction supervision, shop drawings etc.? Easier and more abundant than FEA.
RE: Thoughts on FEA consulting services
we are not insured for liability within the construction field. Believe it or not, our policy only includes various forms of transportation equipment.
I suppose we could get insured as required for that type of work, if it really is abundant.
tg
RE: Thoughts on FEA consulting services
15 years ago (1988) I startd out alone doing linear FE analysis. Back then this was quite advanced, and no one believed anything more could be done. (By the time I started I had worked with FE for 5 years) At the same time many customers did not even believe simple linear analysis could be done by computer. Over the years we (today we are 8 people doing FE work) advanced to dynamics and non-linear problems. In fact today, most of our projects are within structural dynamics. I think that is because most CAD systems today can handle linear statics by their embedded code, although sometimes crazy results will come out. Dynamics, on the other hand, is a scary business, and very few non FE people will dare to touch it. So today, most of our business is in linear and non-linear dynamics.
I think you need to remember the following:
Always ask the questions: Why do structures fail? It might not have anything to do with things you can solve by FE
What does the customer want? You might think what he wants is just rubbish, but remember, he knows his product much better than you. Althoug many times it is just rubbish. Once a customer did not want a finer mesh in the radius, because that would cost more to remesh and the stress results would be even higher. (No kidding) Of course as a consultant you are bound to point this out, but you still cannot force your customer.
Even if you find out you will not go for non-linear and dynamics, you must be able to tell the customner when the problem can not be solved by linear, static analysis. And I think if you are in the tranportation business, dynamics is the world.
Always stay ahead of your customers. Don't approach a customer that has more skills than yourself in the field you'r doing consulting in.
The only way you can stay alive is, of course, to find customers, but I think more important to keep the customer happy. He will then not consider others for the job. He will keep coming back, and back and....
As others have already stated. Be prepared to work long hours, long periods of time without turnover.
This is not to scare you. If you are confident, have a go at it!
RE: Thoughts on FEA consulting services
I am living in Canada (Montreal) too. I think that if you can reach the first customers and make them happy then your idea is a great idea. I do have experience in Nonlinear FEA.
Regards,
AAY
RE: Thoughts on FEA consulting services
going back to your post (19th march '04) ...
go with the real estate idea ! ...
how do you make a small fortune out of aerospace ?
start with a large one !
RE: Thoughts on FEA consulting services
(In the booming voice of Ed McMahon on the Tonite Show)
YOU ARE CORRECT SIR...
LOL,
tg
RE: Thoughts on FEA consulting services
So, did you go ahead and invest in FEA side of your business?
I have read all replies here.. and was curious as to what is your business status in regards to FEA?
Thanks.
Rob.
RE: Thoughts on FEA consulting services
We have NOT gone ahead. We are still not equipped for FEA in-house (except the FEA module in Inventor Pro), but we have access to several decent FEA consultants.
We are focusing on design backed up by hand (Excel)calcs. We are still keeping our eyes open for a decent package - most likely NE/Nastran but 1 station only, to assist our design process.
That said, we have been extremely busy in the last 12 months, so I'm not complaining.
tg