Protection vs. Metering
Protection vs. Metering
(OP)
Hello,
Is it appropriate/advantageous to place an ammeter on the same ct as an instantaneous overcurrent relay and a motor protection relay ( all burdens in series)? i.e. metering and control on same ct?
Thanks in advance...
Is it appropriate/advantageous to place an ammeter on the same ct as an instantaneous overcurrent relay and a motor protection relay ( all burdens in series)? i.e. metering and control on same ct?
Thanks in advance...






RE: Protection vs. Metering
From an ammeter perspective, if the purpose is general indication, then it should function ok using a CT rated with a protection accuracy class. If the ammeter is for revenue metering, then you would be well advised to connect it to a CT with a revenue metering accuracy class.
Inserting the ammeter into the protection circuit will place an additional burden on the CT. If the ammeter is electronic, then that additional burden will most likely be inconsequencial. Either way, you'll need to confirm that the additional burden of the ammeter will not cause the CT's accuracy class burden to be exceeded.
On a reliability note, what are the consequences of the ammeter failing? If this relay will trip off a line when the ammeter fails shorted acress the CT (i.e. no/little current makes it to the relay), then it may not make sense to put the meter in the same circuit as the relay.
RE: Protection vs. Metering
-----------------------------------
Start each new day with a smile.
Get it over with.
RE: Protection vs. Metering
RE: Protection vs. Metering
1. If the ammeter fails, it will compromise the protection circuit, which might have serious consequences.
2. The ammeter incorporated in the circuit safely would require its safe incorporation additional hardware, e.g. an auxiliary transformer.
3. Generally, the metering is often located in the metering cubicle and the protection in the protection cubicle.
4. Etc.
However, when it comes to motor applications, the ammeter may be viewed as a luxury item, and any cost cutting measures may prevail.
RE: Protection vs. Metering
I have never had a situation where an ammeter failed during a fault. If this is a concern then an ammeter selector switch could be installed and kept in the OFF position except for viewing loads.
Note: if you’re installing a modern solid state motor protector relay, a separate ammeter will not be required since these units give a current display.
RE: Protection vs. Metering
1) Protection CT's have a greater saturation level than instrumentation CT's, it is therefore probable that a hefty fault would stuff your meter.
2) I have operated an ammeter selection switch on an old Crompton Parkinson ACB (this being connected into the protection CT un beknown to me) - result, CB tripped and production line shut down with significant down-time and re-tooling cost.
Plus you already have some very valid technical responses from scotty et al above, on the subject of the response from "Alwaysexciter", I have been made aware of an instance where an intermittent ammeter fault kept causing spurious tripping during starting of a large pump motor (3.3kV 150kW DOL) in an industrial process.
_______________________________________
Colin J Flatters BSc(Hons) IEng MIEE MIIE
Electrical Engineer / Project Manager
Email - cflatters@colin7.demon.co.uk.
RE: Protection vs. Metering
RE: Protection vs. Metering
I wonder if there are significant differences in the robustness (is that a word?) and overload withstand capacity of meters from our respective countries? There certainly are noticeable differences in other equipment, where the US-origin equipment tends to be big 'n' beautiful compared to the European equivalent which is usually just big enough to meet the spec. On the other hand, I think the average European equipment is superior in terms of shrouding of live terminals, and sometimes in design technology where sophistication is used rather than brute force.
I'm not advocating one or the other, before all the US engineers shout 'Foul!'. There are numerous items of equipment we have installed where the brute force solution of a US-manufactured part has been far better than the European equivalent, and where we have gone to the trouble to source the US part.
-----------------------------------
Start each new day with a smile.
Get it over with.
RE: Protection vs. Metering
If cost is that much of an issue, the standard arrangement of O/L's - shorting block - AM switch is the ticket.
RE: Protection vs. Metering
ANSI metering standards do not preclude CTs from meeting protection class requirements as well. Good way for CT manufacturers to reduce inventory, just send the right set of curves along. I regularly specify dual class CTs. What else would you use with a protection device that also claims ANSI metering acurracy? Are IEC metering CTs required to saturate during 10X faults?
RE: Protection vs. Metering
RE: Protection vs. Metering
http://www.thomasregister.com
and type Monitors: Voltage & Current under Product or Service, which will return 82 companies to approach to for motor current monitors
RE: Protection vs. Metering
My recollection of my first instance is that the culprit was an ammeter selection switch, not an actual ammeter which must have momentarily open-circuited the protection CT to trip the breaker.
_______________________________________
Regards -
Colin J Flatters
Consulting Engineer & Project Manager
RE: Protection vs. Metering
My recollection of my first instance is that the culprit was an ammeter selection switch, not an actual ammeter which must have momentarily open-circuited the protection CT to trip the breaker.
///This is one way to engineer and design such an ammeter in the circuit. Another way is to use a millivoltmeter, shunt resistor and TVSS to protect the millivoltmeter.\\\
RE: Protection vs. Metering
Yes, IEC metering CTs are required to saturate. They have an instrument security factor, Fs, that indicaties the multiple of rated current at which the metering core will saturate. It is given as a maximum value and is usually 5 or 10.
RE: Protection vs. Metering
Not to split hairs, but not all IEC metering accuracy CTs have a security factor, especially ones used for indication metering, i.e. cl 0.5 or cl 1.0. Unless something is rated like Cl. 0.2Fs5, the CT is not assumed to saturate quickly.
Also, it should be noted that the security factor is only valid if loaded at the rated burden. The saturation point increases linearly as the burden decreases, i.e. half the rated burden means twice the rated security factor. Most CT specification I run across tend to specify a much higher burden than is seen in most modern installations.
RE: Protection vs. Metering
So ScottyUK and CJ, are you checking burdens and saturation factors for every ammeter installation? I'm not too concerned about about damage to instruments or CTs, or even loss of protection. It's the people exposed to a potentially open CT circuit that would concern me.
I haven't found an ANSI/IEEE/NEMA standard that addresses the ammeter side yet. Maybe the manufacturing standard is simply CYA. I would think that standard would cover both sides of the Atlantic, though.
RE: Protection vs. Metering
In answer to your first question, no more so than you are, I bet. I just prefer to keep ammeters out of protective relaying circuits, as it's my opinion that protection circuits are best kept as simple and with as few weak links as possible. Adding ammeters into the loop isn't compatible with that philosophy. The original question was about adding ammeters into the relay circuit, not about using protection-class CTs with ammeters; this thread seems to have changed direction slightly.
As you say, the safety hazard presented by open-circuit CTs is far greater concern than damaging an ammeter.
-----------------------------------
Start each new day with a smile.
Get it over with.
RE: Protection vs. Metering
It's the people exposed to a potentially open CT circuit that would concern me.
///The CT secondary may be protected by a voltage limiting device so that the open CT circuit is always safe as far as the CT secondary voltage is concerned.\\\
RE: Protection vs. Metering
Jbartos - Thanks for the tip about the millivoltmeter / shunt / TVSS option. Which particular voltage limiting devices to you use to protect personnel (re your reply 11/4).
Thanks chaps.
_______________________________________
Regards -
Colin J Flatters
Consulting Engineer & Project Manager
RE: Protection vs. Metering
http://www.powersmiths.com/products/smart1.shtml
for:
The Powersmiths SMART1 package provides safe and easy external access to live transformer primary and secondary voltages and currents, operating temperature, and TVSS status (if installed) without opening the transformer enclosure.
RE: Protection vs. Metering
I think it is no problem considering that present day meters can withstand 10times the rated current for 0.5second, typically.
The protection class CTs are mostly with accuracy limit factor 10 (say 5P10 to IEC).