×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

API-620 tanks Limits on Flat Bottomed design

API-620 tanks Limits on Flat Bottomed design

API-620 tanks Limits on Flat Bottomed design

(OP)
To all,

I am aware of the 2.5 to 15 psig pressure design limits for tanks designed to API-620.

What are the practical pressure and diameter limits for flat bottomed tank design ?  

At what combination of pressure and diameter make a flat bottomed tank unecononomical and make a tank with two dished ends a better choice ? (assume carbon steel at ambient temperature ?

For example, assume a 12 foot diameter tank, 33,000 gallons designed to 14 psig......is an API-620 design (flat bottom) or a "non-coded" ASME-VIII design (horizontal with dished heads) more econonomical ?

Is there some general criteria that could be used/shared here ?

Thank you for your input....

MJC
  

  

RE: API-620 tanks Limits on Flat Bottomed design

A large flat bottom AST per API-620 is often limited in size due to economic factors.  If you have enough money, you could build a 300ft diameter tank for 15 psi.  The foundation would be massive and so would the cost.

As a practical matter consider the large LNG tanks.  They are often in the 200ft diameter range and are designed for 1 to 2 psi.  They are designed to API-620, Appendix Q.

Also, consider the large LPG and Ammonia tanks designed to API-620, Appendix R.  They are often built at around 100-120 ft in diameter and designed for a pressure of about 2 to 2.5 psi.

I would accept these sizes as indicative of the economocal size of a large-low pressure storage tank.

Historically, the large vertical tanks designed for higher pressures, say in the range of 6 to 10 psi, we not flat bottom tanks with anchors.  They were built with dished bottoms of various configurations.  I have an old Hammond Ironworks brochure around here somewhere that give a range of sizes vs pressure of tanks that they built.  I could send you a copy of it to you if you wish.  it is from the 1950s, so its quite outdated, but interesting nevertheless.

Steve Braune
Tank Industry Consultants
www.tankindustry.com

RE: API-620 tanks Limits on Flat Bottomed design

In my not very long experience, i only have met large tanks designed in accordance with API 620, more than 200feet in diameter. I´ve seen smaller tanks to API 650, 30feet in diameter.

I don`t really think API 620 would be an economical option for your tank. Try the API 650 or any other option you can consider,

Best regards,

Armesto

RE: API-620 tanks Limits on Flat Bottomed design

(OP)
To all,

I guess I should better phrase my question....

For a specific liquid with a specific vapor pressure ( say 10 psig) is there a "company standard", commonly accepted practice, position paper or guideline that would help me decide the economics between an API-620 flat-bottomed tank or a horizontal "dished end" tank ?

My search is for a general practice or guideline and I feel that someone out there has asked this question before....

I am aware that I can get quotes for each style and compare, but is there an easier, more general method ?  

I suspect that some huge chemical company such as Dow, Monsanto or someone has evaluated this.....

MJC

  

RE: API-620 tanks Limits on Flat Bottomed design

Mr Cronin,

The answer is probably going to be driven by the tank volume too.  If it's a small volume, say no more than about 30,000 gallons, I'd assume that a shop fabricated ASME design, w/o Code stamp, would be cheaper than an API-620 tank.  The horizontal tank approach would be "self-contained", in that the foundation would not know the tank is pressurized.  

A vertical flat bottom AST per API-620 would have a large foundation with a bunch of anchors to resist the pressure uplift on the tank.

Hope this helps.

Steve Braune
Tank Industry Consultants
www.tankindustry.com

RE: API-620 tanks Limits on Flat Bottomed design

(OP)
Steve,

Thank you for your help.... I was fishing around for something that may not exist

I believe you are a real asset to this Forum...

  

RE: API-620 tanks Limits on Flat Bottomed design

Steve,

One of the reasons for the upper limitation of 15 PSIG is that most jurisdictions exempt from regulation vessels that are adequately protected from over pressure at 15PSIG or less, and require ASME standard certification if pressure exceeds 15 PSIG. API 620 allows lapped bottom plates in some cases, where ASME Section VIII Div 1 would permit a flat bottom head, but not allow it to contain lap joints. Another practical limitation is that a bottom head that was flat would require a significantly greater thickness than a formed head (Torispherical, ellipsoidal, etc) of the same diameter.

Dan W

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources