×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

303 & 304 Stainless compatibility

303 & 304 Stainless compatibility

303 & 304 Stainless compatibility

(OP)
Is there any reaction that takes place when 303 and 304 series stainless steel come in contact with each other?  I know these are pretty similar in composition.  Is there any increased corrosion of the material if for example a 303 series threaded rod were threaded into a 304 series threaded hole?

RE: 303 & 304 Stainless compatibility

303 stainless has much higher carbon than 304, this may cause an electrochemical cell to form since the higher carbon content in the 303 will cause it to be less noble.

Nick

RE: 303 & 304 Stainless compatibility

The main difference is the sulfur content:  303 has a minimum of 0.15 wt% S to aid machining, while 304 has a maximum of 0.03 wt% S.  In both cases, the solubility of the austenitic metal matrix is exceeded, and the S is present primarily as MnS inclusions.  The pitting potential of the bulk alloys is about equivalent although the 303 will have roughly 5 times as many localized surface discontinuities.  Hence, it is a very good idea to passivate 303 in order to remove surface MnS.

NickE is correct in that 303 contains 0.15 wt% C vs. 0.08 wt% C in 304.  However, 303 typically has an extra 1 wt% Cr to compensate (average 19 % Cr vs. av. 18% Cr in 304).

Some producers add 0.6% Mo (optional) to 303 to improve resistance to pitting.
All things considered, and especially if you passivate to remove surface Mn, there should not be a galvanic problem between 303 and 304.  

The worst problems I have seen with threaded connections involving 303, 304, 304L, 316 and 316L and combinations thereof involve galling (cold welding).  This can occur under thread loadings as small as 1000 psi.  Advise using an anti-galling thread lubricant – many have been recommended in this forum.  For more information on galling between various SS combinations (self and dissimilar), request Carpenter Technologies' SS Manual.  Galling information is in the chapter on Fabrication. http://www.cartech.com/cartech/WRLProdDisplayServlet/?product=0501&leftn=sao_products&lefto=empty&lefti=sao_pl0

Hope this helps,
Ken

RE: 303 & 304 Stainless compatibility

(OP)
Thanks Ken & Nick.  I think that should answer my questions for now.  I will add to this post if there is anything else I am looking for.

Chad

RE: 303 & 304 Stainless compatibility

Chad,

The simple answer is no.  They are basically the same alloy with the exception of sulfur.  The 303 can also be very low carbon.  I have seen some at a .015 carbin level.

One other thing to realize, 303 will crack, especially in small diameters due to the sulfide stringers whereas 304 will not crack.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources