unit conversion
unit conversion
(OP)
I don't know if I am in the right forum (just dropping in), however, need some help with a conversion.
I have a support (electrical insulator) that is good for a certain force in in.lbs (fron the data sheet). I have also calculated the force on the insulator for the given arrangement, only the result is in daN.
How do I get the units to equal?
Thanks.
I have a support (electrical insulator) that is good for a certain force in in.lbs (fron the data sheet). I have also calculated the force on the insulator for the given arrangement, only the result is in daN.
How do I get the units to equal?
Thanks.





RE: unit conversion
daN, I assume is deka-Newton(?) is a force, so they are not convertible.
TTFN
RE: unit conversion
and IRstuff told it, there is no conversion between force and torque. You should be missing something here.
Cyril Guichard
Mechanical Engineer
RE: unit conversion
THe insulator is rated for 1200 in.lbs...
How do I get to these units? I relaize one is a Torque and one is a Force, however there is a length of bus involved so can I not find out the cantilever force in in.lbs?
RE: unit conversion
David Simpson, PE
MuleShoe Engineering
www.muleshoe-eng.com
RE: unit conversion
RE: unit conversion
www.joshmadison.com/software/convert/
RE: unit conversion
Regards,
XHPIPE
RE: unit conversion
RE: unit conversion
Why doesn't everybody use SI?
RE: unit conversion
SACEM1
RE: unit conversion
RE: unit conversion
"I will convert to metric when they pry my cold dead fingers off of my slide rule."
rmw
RE: unit conversion
Remember the slide rule rule.
rmw
RE: unit conversion
in metric system the units and muliplicant symbols are "case sensitive". Therefore:
M means mega
K means Kelvin
m means meter (or milli)
k means kilo
And kg is a unit of mass, not of the force, therefore m.kg is not valid unit of torque. In metric prehistoric time the kgf (kilogram of force was used in some countries. To eliminate the confusion, the unit Newton was invented. Because it is small force, sometimes the daN is used, what is almost the same force as the now illegal kgf...)
Just to confuse people little bit more...
RE: unit conversion
You are dragging me kicking and screaming into the modern metric era. I am to old to have been taught the metric system. My children were. (the slide rule comment should be a hint)
I must have been working with technical neanderthals, (Spaniards) because they only recently converted from meter kilograms for a torque rating to meters deca newtons. Recently being in the last 10-15 years. Their product models are still based on the old mkg ratings, while the spec sheets are given in the meters daN values. I also noticed that they did everything in mm, while other systems used cm, and other units. Enough to drive me nuts.
I appreciate your post, because I did not know why the change, and was just paranoid enough to think that they did it just to confound me. I had actually gotten to where I could convert m-kgf to ft. lbs in my head. (if my memory is good, the conversion is 7.23) I am giving you a star for your help. I found it enlightening, even if I did not want to know. Next they will be wanting me to change to a metric slide rule.
Now, I wish you would straighten out the South Africans, and the Germans, so that they would settle on tonnes/hr or kg/hr, bar or kpa, W/m^2K or kW/m^2/K, etc., and make it easier on us gringos.
rmw
RE: unit conversion
It seems that the one thing that "drives all of you guys nuts" is that Newton thing and that you are not allowed to use the unit for mass as a unit for force.
As you all probably know, one kilogram has the same mass wherever it is, but it does not exert the same force on the moon as it does on the earth. So it is only natural that there are different units for mass and force.
It is understandable that you pounds and inches guys are reluctant to let go he old and well-known system of yours, but I think that you should give it a try. The English managed to introduce the decimal monetary system (and the US had it from the beginning) and if you ask an English child to reckon out how many pennnies there is (was) to a guinea they will be totally lost. Multiplying 12, 20 and 21 simply is too much - and the same situation exists when doing calculations in the rest of the imperial system.
Sigh, again.
It is very illustrative to se so many references to the slide rule. We metric guys seldom need slide rules - and if we need them - we use more contemporary devices like calculators and computers. Are they not known in the imperial world?
RE: unit conversion
RE: unit conversion
A client of mine remarked once not too long ago, that every once and a while he gets his slide rule out of his desk drawer, and throws it on his desk just to remind himself of who he really is.
I have adopted his practice. It is a good reality check, then I go back to my HP 28S, and hope I don't push the wrong button if my teenage children are not nearby.
Skogsgurra,
If the metric system, and the decimal money system are so great, then why not a decimal clock. Days, deca days, centi days, milli days, etc. The logic must hold.
rmw
RE: unit conversion
thanks for the star.
Your Spaniards are an example of the inconsistency in the metric world. They obviously need skogsgurra's assistance to learn the difference between the mass and force. A lot of people has no idea about it.
I am a metric transplant into an "imperial" - an ugly word for this country (US) and I love my locally made/designed/invented HP28S, TI, PC, PDA, SUN workstation, I also still keep my old metric made slide rule, more as a collectible than a tool.
skogsgurra,
I believe it is not the system of units what makes good or bad engineers or - a country...
RE: unit conversion
There are 3 slide rules in my desk drawer. The beginners model that I probably had in high school, the 10" I used to get an engineering education, and the 5 incher that I carried in my pocket for several years as a service engineer for a large steam turbine mfg.
As I have contemplated them, recently, (part of throwing one of them up on the desk, and thinking about my roots,) I have also wondered what my children will do with them when I pass on. My son in law is a Civil Engineer, and I don't even think he has ever seen a real one.
Maybe I can stipulate that they bury them with me. The point is the contrast. My beginnings harken back to the slide rule, which was a mandatory piece of equipment for my profession, and now as I work in the world you describe, HP 28S, PC, Laptop, PDA, e mail, instant messaging, on line calculators, imperial units, metric, SI, etc, I wonder where it will all go even in my (and hopefully your) lifetime. These are challenging times for (old) engineers.
You deserved the star. I learned from your post. And, this site, with its fora is a real help to me in my professional development.
rmw
RE: unit conversion
I created a FAQ Unit Converters (FAQ404-901) consolidating links to on-line unit conversions.
Please also see The Metric Conversion Act of 1975 (www.usaid.gov/policy/ads/300/metricact.pdf) for information on the intended use of SI units in the US.
Best regards,
Matthew Ian Loew
"Luck is the residue of design."
Branch Rickey
Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.
RE: unit conversion
I've also got a copy of Inskips Combined Tables (log tables based on the foot). I have to say if there is one thing that increased efficiency and order of magnitude it was metrication combined with affordable electronic calculators. No way would I want to go back to using Inskips to calculate diagonal lengths to 1/16 th of an inch!!
By the way, did anyone buy and use a Sinclair Scientific electronic calculator?
RE: unit conversion
Decimal time? Oh, yes. Great idea. And as you probably know, the Swatch company introduced that idea sevel years ago. But it didn't seem to catch on.
Being such a jelly. I did buy one of their decimal watches, just to put it in a safe place. I kind of figured that there wouldn't be many after a couple of decades (see, decimal time again!).
Talking of jelly, PeterCharles. Of course I bought a Sinclair, but not a scentific calculator. I bought their first four-banger. Much for the same reason that I bought the Swatch.
And, you know what? I have a Reiss 3227 on my desk. And use it, too. It has got LL0 - LL3 as well as LL00 - LL03, and sinh1 and sinh2 to boot! My Sun-Hemmi pocket model does not serve me any more, eyes are getting a little too weak for those thin lines.
I really apologize if anyone thought that I was making fun of them - or their fathoms or grains. I just thougt that you needed some help to get into an EASIER world of engineering - and I did NOT say better world.
RE: unit conversion
yes, metric is easier - for the people who started with.
But please take into account that there are all the tools, gages, tool machines in this country based on inch system.
The fact, that the design is very often (at least in the auto industry, where it is mandatory for many years) made in mm does not change that inventory. And to run two sets of them (inch and mm) would create even more difficulties.
rmw,
thanks for the sincere, personal thoughts. And yes, these fora are excellent.
For your amusement - the unit for the force in metric evolved through the years 'till the N was finally established. I remember times, when we used kg*
(and kg for mass) then we used kp (kilopond, you can still find it in some German publications), then kgf... All of them meaning the same! And because its size is so familiar, the daN (=0.981 kgf) is sometimes used... I did not mention the "cgs" system what we also used long time ago - based on cm, gram and second. Isn't metric simple?
MLoew
Thanks, it was a good idea.
RE: unit conversion
Steve Braune
Tank Industry Consultants
www.tankindustry.com
RE: unit conversion
Took the car in for service and several months later was stuck on the road with a flat, had 3 lug nuts off but found the remaining one was a real metric nut...ARRRGGHH!!
TTFN
RE: unit conversion
No apology needed. I mentioned in an eariler post, that I have to deal with a metric product, and in another post that is of spanish origin. Gearguru helped me with his post, because I really did not know what drove the change, after I was comfortable in the m-kgf world.
When I can get into a situation where I have to draw something up, and fabricate it myself (hobby stuff), I much prefer the metric system rather than 1/16, 1/32, 1/64, etc.
The part I hate is going back and forth, having to do all the converting. I still can't think in metric, as in have a point of reference. 10 feet is about the height of one story of a building, 50 ft, then would be a 5 story building. And, 150 ft is about half the length of a US football field. But 1910mm, is that as tall as the empire state building, or the height of a basketball goal, or a real tall glass of tea?? I have no mental point of reference. I have to stop and convert it for it to have any meaning for me.
Gearguru said it best, metric is easier for those who started with it. The hard part is knowing that metric is easier, but being thrust into a project like I was recently, where the drawings are 30 years old, and everything is in imperial units. I started with that system, but it is becoming more difficult for me to endure.
I enjoyed the discourse, and your input. Keep 'em coming.
rmw
RE: unit conversion
Time to move up to Mathcad. I use it nearly daily and the beauty is that you can do the unit conversions in situ.
You enter the values in whatever units you want, do the calculations and output the result in the desired units. The real beauty is that since the equations are live, you can change input values and the result is recalculated, again with the desired units.
The big disadvantage of unit converters is that you still have to run the resulting values into a separate converter; change a value and you have to re-convert.
Additionally, most converters do not deal well with converting BTU/hr/ft^2/ºF into W/m^2/ºC in a single operation like you can do in Mathcad.
TTFN
RE: unit conversion
There are two systems in the metric world: cgs (centimeter-gram-second) and mks (meter-kilogram-second) both are systems not units the units are:
length: meter
mass: gram
time: second
The beautty of the metric system is that most units are related to one another and not all arbitrary in their starting point so in most cases one can convert or move from one unit to the other in a very aproximate way with out crunching numbers or looking at tables. i,e,:
length x length = area unit = square meter
length x length x length = volume = cubic meter = 1000liters
Sounds like square feet and cubic feet right but lets get more elaborate: when you go up or down in english units you divide by 144 to move from square feet to square inches and by 1728 from cubic feet to cubic inches in metric from cubic meter to go to a lower unit you just move the decimal point 3 places to get liters and another 3 places to get cubic centimeters no calculator or slide rule needed and no memory or table to look up
The same logic applies to other units: a gram is the mass of 1 cc (cubic centimeter) of pure water at 4ºC at sea level barometric pressure so if you want to know how much does a 4.5 cubic meter tank of water weights you can say very aproximatly that it has 4,500 kg, because there are 4,500 liters in the tank and each liter weights 1 kilogram (right kg is a mass unit but weight is still done in kg-f not Newtons or decaNewtons, by the way 1000 kg is a Metric Ton.
Ever tried to do that with out a slide rule/calc in english units?
By the way temp is based in something we have all around: water, it freezes at 0ºC and boils at 100ºC (at atmosferic pressure and pure water but usually differences are not requiered for normal use) not 32ºF or 212ºF and why did you made 180º in between?
This is not intended to be a units class but just to make a point, metric is more logic and intuitive to use once you get a grab on it, but for the time being we are stuck with two systems and the change is going to be slow and for some painfull, here we use both systems (english/metric) every single day and it's sometimes confusing but in the end metric will prevail because its simply more logical.
SACEM1
RE: unit conversion
RE: unit conversion
I have an inspector working for my company that is resident at a Japanese manufacturer's facility.
He has a tape measure that is graduated in meters/centimeters/millimeters along one edge and 1/33 meter increments along the other edge.
Anybody car to venture a guess on the significance of the thirty-third of a meter?
RE: unit conversion
RE: unit conversion
as I mentione above, I am an old metric man transplanted in inch based world, so I know what you are talking about.
It was pain for me to learn the fractions, and I still can not visualize the small distances, thousandths of an inch, for example. My colleagues have the same problem with mm, We use them all the time, but they first convert to inch and then they know what approx. it is in size.
Yes, metric is more logical. But I learned that to change to it is not that simple. And to convince the inch people that it is better, it should be used more uniformly in metric countries (see rmw's Spaniards). Somewhere I read a question - why the liter is not 1 cubic meter? Why cubic decimeter? And why the unit of pressure "bar" is still legal and used in some countries? (we both know that it is almost the same as 1kgf/cm2, the old good "atmosphere")
I promise that this is my last entry in this neverending topic.
RE: unit conversion
I work with heat transfer a lot, (heat transfer equipment produced in Germany, customers in USA, with a lot of the technical data from South Africa, and I have to be the interface between those two metric systems, and the end users. Hence my comments earlier about the fun of having to convert back and forth in order to function as the liason.
I like a conversion program available from the sugartech site, www.sugartech.co.za, called Uconeer, by Katmar. It has the OHTC conversions, as well as a volumetric to mass flow rate converter, if you have the sp. gr. to input.
If you work with heat transfer, I recommend it.
I also use a conversion program that is part of a vacuum equipment sizing software that Graham, www.graham-mfg.com distrubutes. I use the mollier and conversion functions much more than I use it to size jets and pumps.
I thought others involved in this thread might be interested in these converters, so I followed up on your post.
sacem1,
I am giving you a star. Your post was educational for those of us who are still struggling to correlate the two, especially when it involves more than just converting inches to mm.
SteveBraune,
I thought your post was poignent, but in the case of those that I work with, I think the word "getting" would be best substituted with "being drug kicking and screaming"
To all contributors to this post, it is obvious by the comments submitted that this is an "up front and personal" issue with many in the engineering profession. Thanks for all the valuable input.
RE: unit conversion
This allows me to use h's in BTU/hr/m^2/ºF with areas in ft^2 and power in Watts completely with the equations. This is all done completely on the fly by Mathcad. Since everything is live, I can immediately change the area to something in m^2 without changing anything else in the calcuation and the results will come out correctly.
TTFN
RE: unit conversion
Yes, 1/33 of a meter. 3.03 cm.
RE: unit conversion
RE: unit conversion
Check this out
http://www.raenbo.com/pages/base12-3.html
RE: unit conversion
rmw
RE: unit conversion
A free program called WinConvert is what I use all the time to go between units, specifically English to Metric(SI) etc.
I hope this helps!
Brian
RE: unit conversion
Thanks for the link. I added it to the FAQ Unit Converters (FAQ404-901).
All,
If anyone has any other links they would like me to add to the FAQ, please use the Send a Comment to MLoew About This FAQ link to send me comments rather than promulgating in this thread.
Best regards,
Matthew Ian Loew
"Luck is the residue of design."
Branch Rickey
Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.