×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Alternatives to pre-cast deck

Alternatives to pre-cast deck

Alternatives to pre-cast deck

(OP)
I have a new project that requires a raised deck spanning an area of 24 ft. x 34 ft. in a parking structure. The deck must support automotive traffic. I have been told by most that pre-cast planks such as Span-Crete is the way to go. I am not a concrete expert, but it would seem that a poured deck would be cheaper. This is part of a system I am trying to develop a market for, and cost is an issue. The deck will be supported on block around the entire perimeter. Any suggestions are greatly appreciated.

Thanks!

RE: Alternatives to pre-cast deck

MarkWPflow,

I believe elevated slabs for the application you're shooting for usually involve post-tensioning.  You'll probably find that this method is not anywhere close to being the least expensive.  Best of luck.  

  

RE: Alternatives to pre-cast deck

(OP)
Thanks for the post dirtsqueezer,

I should probably have clarified that the deck is not supported directly on the block wall, just that the wall is available around the entire perimeter. I was anticipating that joists, beams, or trusses of reasonable depth would be used in conjunction with a steel pan or some such arrangement. I'm just not well versed in concrete construction techniques and was looking for some direction.

Thanks again.

RE: Alternatives to pre-cast deck

One advantage of pre-cast concrete deck (hollow core slabs or double tee's) is manpower cost.  A cast in place deck takes man hours to set forms and reinforcing and to pour the concrete.  You then have shoring, re-shoring, and form stripping.  If you want to minimize the concrete member sizes, you will generally choose a post tensioned system.  However, this adds an extra step to the construction process; tensioning the slabs/beams.  Another advantage is time.  The precast pieces are manufactured off site after shop drawings have been approved.  The approval process can be started at the same time as the superstructure approval process is started.  Pre-cast concrete members can arrive on site as soon as they can be erected.  Both construction types have their place depending on the constraints of the project.  Items that affect construction system are cost, time, environment, expected life of structure, deck lay-out, etc.

RE: Alternatives to pre-cast deck

I was involved in an economic study about 10 years ago regarding various types of construction for parking garages. Even with only one local precaster (no competition), the most cost-effective system, taking into consideration ease of construction, quality, low maintenance (in a freeze-thaw, deising chemical environment)and life-cycle costing was precast.

The beauty of the system was that column spacings were far greater and floor heights could be reduced, over conventional concrete systems.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources