×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

National PE License?
11

National PE License?

National PE License?

(OP)


I'm wondering what other folks think about this. Do you think that we should have 1 PE license good for the whole USA? Or shall we keep the current state license sysytem? I'm wondering if a single national license has ever been pursued with the government and if not, how would one go about fighting for it?

RE: National PE License?

I think it is bad because it would limit local control. multiple liscenses also makes it slightly more dificult for an engineer in india or china to get one national liscense and start working in my backyard with no local say in it

RE: National PE License?

Your idea is probably a good one but personally, I would hate to see it happen.

The down side is that you would have to work and communicate with the federal government --- it could take years to even get scheduled to take the test for licensure.

I say the feds have their fingers in too many pots already. Feds should be concerned only with the types of things they were originally authorized, i.e.  foreign affairs, defence of the general population, inter-state commerce etc.

I think they should stay out of professional, social, religious, and personal aspects of life. After all, why would you want the most inefficient organization ever implemented having a say in your professional life.


Have a Great Day

ietech

RE: National PE License?

Anything, including technical stuff, that goes from state control to federal control sounds like a bad idea at just the mention of it.  The most obvious problem would be loss of local jurisdictional requirements.  For example, the western states have special requirements for seismic considerations.  Ditto Alaska for permafrost issues.

Steve Braune
Tank Industry Consultants
www.tankindustry.com

RE: National PE License?

The NCEE has a program that will make it easy if you want to practice in several states.  They help keep your records up to date and will send copies to a state you want to register in.  
Here's their website.
 http://www.ncees.org/records/establishing_a_record/

RE: National PE License?

Do you think the states want to relinquish the income from licensing fees? Be careful what you wish for ... when hunting waterfowl you usually have to buy both a state and a federal duck stamp. If the federal government thinks they can make money on a national engineering licensing fee in addition to the state fees people pay already, you'll be emptying your pockets with both hands. Let's not give them any ideas.

xnuke

Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips.

RE: National PE License?

xnuke,
I doubt the income from PE licensing is a significant factor.  In most states the fees go to just the PE Board to sustain it.  In one state I pay only $25 for two years.  That ain't much.

Steve Braune
Tank Industry Consultants
www.tankindustry.com

RE: National PE License?

Look at Tennesse  they have a   PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE TAX  
 of $400 annually http://www.state.tn.us/revenue/misc/proffaq.htm#nowhere ontop of the the PE Licensing fee.
 
professional privilege tax is levied on the privilege of having an active license to practice certain professions, businesses or occupations listed below:

(1) Persons registered as lobbyists pursuant to
     Tenn. Code Ann. Section 3-6-104;

(2) Persons licensed or registered under Title
     48, Chapter 2, as:
(a) brokers;
(b) agents; and
(c) investment advisors;

(3) Persons licensed or registered under Title
     62 as:
(a) accountants;
(b) engineers;
(c) architects;
(d) landscape architects; and
(e) brokers, as defined in
     Tenn. Code Ann. Section 62-13-102(2).

(4) Persons licensed or registered under Title
     63 as:
(a) chiropractors;
(b) dentists;
(c) physicians;
(d) pharmacists;
(e) psychologists;
(f) optometrists;
(g) veterinarians;
(h) audiologists;
(i) osteopathic physicians;
(j) podiatrists;
(k) speech pathologists; and
(l) sports agents

(5) Persons licensed as attorneys by the
     Supreme Court of Tennessee.

RE: National PE License?

Aside all the little problems (state vs feds), would it be nice to have a general licence that allows to practice where you go? Nothing can prevent local organizations to include specifics in the general practice (seismics, electrical, safety).
After all we travel and practice on the entire continent (Canada, USA and Mexico). Hopefully the time will come.

RE: National PE License?

stel8,
As one that practices in many places, there are no impediments that I have encountered.  Obtaining a license in another state is not an impediment, it's appropriate.  Yes, the forms are a pain, but the NCEES organization makes it much easier.  I think a federal PE license combined with something local (ie; seismic, permafrost, etc) is worse that just local.  Again, keep the feds out as there is no apparent added value..

Steve Braune
Tank Industry Consultants
www.tankindustry.com

RE: National PE License?

I agree with Steve.

I believe that all States use the NCEES approved exams, except for Ohio in Welding Engineering, and with the NCEES record, in essence you have a national PE though you can not pratice without a state issued license.

With the "model law" NCEES record one can obtain an engineering license in a few hours, Ohio for example.
Individual states must remain in control:

  1. Local conditions, for example the soil conditions in Alaska are different than Delaware and the seismic conditons in California are different than Maine.
  2. Bidding processes are different.
  3. The requirements of what must be sealed/stamped are different


I have never had any implements,  I am licensed in multiple states and counties.

RE: National PE License?

Rich2001.
As I look down the list of licensed professions, I noted "brokers".  Isn't is great to regulated by the same board that controls pawn brokers!

Steve Braune
Tank Industry Consultants
www.tankindustry.com

RE: National PE License?

3
I have a provincial drivers license. With it I can drive almost anywhere in the world, certainly anywhere in North America. If I get a speeding ticket, it is reported by the US state to my provincial authorities and the demerits go against my provincial license.

Traffic laws, testing standards etc are all different as one travels from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. All other jurisdictions have no say in what I have to do to get a Manitoba license, but they recognize my license.  If I drive improperly I can cause damage and injuries. I may be acting correctly by the rules of the road in Manitoba but elsewhere where the rules are different this can cause problems. (For example turning right on a red light is legal here but not legal everywhere, I can drive in the UK or Jamaica where they drive on the opposite side of the road. UK residents can drive in Canada.)

I have a provincial license to practice engineering. Once I leave my home province, this license has no meaning. It will allow me to get a different license in another province easily, but it has no recognition in most of the US states.

Why are the two licenses treated differently? Why won’t say South Carolina or Delaware recognize that I am a professional engineer? They recognize my driver’s license but not my engineering license.

Almost everyone has a driver’s license. Politicians recognize that the voters want agreements on reciprocity simply because North American society is highly mobile. For engineering, where the number of professionals is much less than the number of drivers the popular support for universal licensing is simply not there.

The real reason is that the local engineers simply want to protect their backyard from outsider’s doing business there. It’s simply restraint of trade. In Saskatchewan, which has some of the strictest rules on getting a Permit to Consult (a second license in addition to the personal license) I have had fellow engineers freely state that they like the trade protection offered by the process.

If we had agreements like those in effect for driver’s licenses where another jurisdiction could exercise discipline against an engineer and that the home jurisdiction would recognize that discipline, they there is no valid reason not to have national or even international engineering licenses.



 

Rick Kitson MBA P.Eng

Construction Project Management
From conception to completion
www.kitsonengineering.com

RE: National PE License?

Mr. Kitson,

A brief response...

"Why are the two licenses treated differently? Why won’t say South Carolina or Delaware recognize that I am a professional engineer? They recognize my driver’s license but not my engineering license."

They will recognize your license, skills and experience, but you have do more than drive across the state line.  The PE application process is very friendly on the reciprocity side.  Many states provide a temporary permit upon submittal of an application.  It's not drive thru service, but it's next best thing.

"The real reason is that the local engineers simply want to protect their backyard from outsider’s doing business there. It’s simply restraint of trade."

I'm a local engineer and I don't feel that way.  I know a lot of local engineers and they don't feel that way.  I'm a PE in a number of states and have never even seen even a hint if that attitude.  I do not believe that you are correct about that statement.

Steve Braune
Tank Industry Consultants
www.tankindustry.com

RE: National PE License?

RDK,

Looking through the review board minutes from my state, quite a few Canadian licensees are also granted PE's.  The one's that have a PE denied tended to be those with insufficient documented experience.  Some states will be more familiar with Canadian licensing requirements and practices than others and I would think that would make a difference in ease of attaining a PE.

Regards,

RE: National PE License?


If I can get an US state’s license simply by as asking for it, it is still more hassle than simply setting up practicing engineering in that state.

I can get another provincial license simply by applying for it. I have done so in two other provinces. However I can still drive there with no application process.

The are only three arguments for separate engineering licenses.

The first is “our conditions are different here” Right now it is –20C outside and that is up 10 degrees since the weekend. Most of Canada is under some sort of weather advisory right now. But your Florida driver’s license still allows you to drive on our roads. If that is not vastly different conditions that should require that you be locally licensed then I do not know what is.

My Manitoba license allows me to design buildings anywhere in the province. That includes soil conditions from Red River gumbo, which is a stiff highly plastic clay, to the sand conditions around my home town to the permafrost conditions in the north part of the province.  

There is no difference in environmental conditions from Emerson Manitoba to Pembina North Dakota, a distance of 10 kms or so.

Second argument is that local jurisdictions do not have any control over out of jurisdiction licensees. If I get caught speeding in Texas, the fine and demerits are enforceable against my Manitoba driver’s license by mutual agreement. Why cannot a separate engineering agreement along the same lines be developed?

The third argument is that laws differ between the different jurisdictions.  They are not that much different as we often believe. NFPA 70 is a carbon copy of the US NEC and the only differences that I can find between those codes and CSA C22, the Canadian Electrical Code is that the CSA code is in metric and the US codes use imperial measurements.

Traffic laws differ more in various jurisdictions. Some places drive on the left side of the road and some drive on the right side. A UK driver’s license is valid in Canada and the US, why not a UK Chartered Engineer status?

As professionals it is our responsibility that we only seal those drawings that we have the knowledge, ability and experience to take professional responsibility for. That would include knowledge of local laws and codes, just like driving requires that we be knowledgeable of the local laws and conditions when we travel.


Rick Kitson MBA P.Eng

Construction Project Management
From conception to completion
www.kitsonengineering.com

RE: National PE License?

Mr. Kitson,

The privilege extended to licensed drivers from other states or countries is a simply a temporary courtesy extended by the host.  I think some international protocol is involved too.  However, anyone wishing to stay is typically required to obtain a local license after some period.

Yes, there is more hassle in the PE process.  Engineer's who want to practice elsewhere put the PE application on their list of the many things that have to be done.  It's not a restriction, it's part of the landscape that I am willing to tolerate. Fortunately, the NCEES system make the process a bit easier.  

Oh by the way, I would never disagree that a national PE license would be easier, but as a former Australian PM once stated... "Life wasn't meant to be easy".

Although this thread started as a discussion about a national PE license, are you suggesting that there should be a US-Canada-UK common PE license too?

Steve Braune
Tank Industry Consultants
www.tankindustry.com

RE: National PE License?

Mr. Kitson
The charter of the board of registration of North Dakota is to assure the safety of North Dakotans.  They have rules to follow as given them by the legislature and they do.  Asside  from theat I have found them easy to work with and to be very helpful.  North Dakota wil require an exam of North Dakota Law. It can be multiple choice or even an interview.  They as do most state board rely heavly  on your references.
It's not all that difficult to get registered in ND.  I have kown people to get a conditional license in 2 or 3 days.  With the internet and email it may be even quicker.  It might take a trip to Bismarck but you could be working on a project in Pembina by the end of the week. I have worked with engineers from Manitoba who were licensed in North Dakota.  The biggest problem they had was some paperwork and a little planning.
We don't really need the feds in our licensing process for a number of reasons.  One is that they see the purpose of engineers differently than the States.  If engineers were regulated by the feds I can forsee engineers from Florida specifing firelines in NoDak burried 3' below the surface etc.

RE: National PE License?

5
I do not believe that public safety is being served by requiring registration in individual states.  As a practical matter, all that is required is sending the NCEES file and paying a fee.  There are a couple exceptions, for example, having to pass a course in cold weather engineering for Alaska.  Other than these few exceptions, there is no value added by the additional registration process.  It simply takes time, and requires the payment of periodic fees.  

There is not only the registration process, but each state can have different regulations governing the practice of engineering.  Again, not necessarily serving public safety.  For example, in New York, a business corporation cannot practice engineering.  Then again, in New Jersey, drivers aren't allowed to pump their own gas, so since when do laws have to make sense.

I don't think this will change, if only because registration of professions, I believe, is part of the state's responsibility (state's rights), not Federal.

So, we will continue to pay fees, etc. to all states we may be registered in.  But NCEES does make the process of registering in additional states much easier.  Well worth the cost if you plan to register in multiple states.

RE: National PE License?

cb4,

"I don't think this will change, if only because registration of professions, I believe, is part of the state's responsibility (state's rights), not Federal."

Very well put cb4!  We've can moan and groan all we want about the current situation, but there are bigger, more important issues in our life.  I pick states rights and all the priviledges that go with it over the mere convenience of a federal system with one PE license.  I have never been upset about the effort necessary to apply fo a PE license in another state.

Steve Braune
Tank Industry Consultants
www.tankindustry.com

RE: National PE License?

I am not sure about the legal ramifications of a national PE license. Supposedly, if a failure occurs that is traced to an incorrect engineering decision, the legal and economic liabilities are determined  in a state court, and the sanction of suspending or removing a person's PE license can be made by a state authority . If there is a national PE license, a state authority would not be able to change the licensee's status directly and would  at best offer a recomendation of censure to the national authority.

RE: National PE License?

I am not arguing for a national license, simply to have my one home jurisdiction license recognized by all other jurisdictions.

I do not have a national driver’s license. I have a Manitoba one and it is automatically recognised in North Dakota.

If I get a driving conviction in the state court in North Dakota, I will have in addition to paying the North Dakota fine, be accessed demerits against my Manitoba driver’s license.

Driving laws and conditions are different in North Dakota than they are here in Manitoba. I am responsible for obeying the laws that exist in wherever I am driving and in adjusting my driving to suit conditions.

Yes it is a courtesy that is extended to me as a visitor in North Dakota and yes if I moved to North Dakota I would have to go and get a North Dakota license. It would involve simply surrendering my Manitoba license and getting a North Dakota one (at least that is what happens in moving to another Canadian province.)

When I first got my license North Dakota had no say in the standards I had to meet and the testing of me to those standards.

No one seems to have problem with this for driver’s licenses. Now substitute the words engineering license for driver’s license and there is a big problem.

If a Florida engineer put a water line 1 m deep in North Dakota, then firstly no reputable contractor would install it without making clear the reason for his protest, but the Florida engineer would be guilty of unethical conduct because he was doing work in which he was unqualified to do. The North Dakota authorities would discipline him and the Florida authorities would ensure that the discipline was carried out.  

No the only real reason that I can see for separate licenses is that it protects North Dakota from having to compete against us Manitobans.  Too bad no one recognises that that also restricts North Dakota from competing for Manitoba work.


Rick Kitson MBA P.Eng

Construction Project Management
From conception to completion
www.kitsonengineering.com

RE: National PE License?

2
(OP)

Folks,

Let me amplify my original post a little further:

a) You take your PE exam and pass.
b) You get a single national license and stamp, marked "USA" instead of "State Of ..."
c) The single national license is administered by all 50 states. If you do anything unethical, the affected state disciplines you. The others act accordingly.

What I'm really trying to do is get rid of the voluminous paperwork, numerous stamps and fees.

A single national license would also make it easier to eliminate the industrial exemption, since manufacturing companies are involved in interstate commerce, thereby needing PEs who are licensed in every state.

RE: National PE License?

I would like to differ on the "easier to eliminate industrial exemption" comment.  In my opinion, the industrial exemption has nothing to do with portability.  In my opinion, it has to do with certain industries/companies wanting worker bee engineers, not engineering professionals, in their employ, with its ramifications (which can include cost).  I know it is a hopeless battle, but, for example, would you use an unlicensed doctor because he worked for a large hospital rather than as a sole practitioner.

Knowing the feedback this can get, I know lots of highly qualified unlicensed engineers and unqualified licensed engineers, but this does not change my opinion.  There are also competant and incompetant doctors, but it is an issue of professionalism.

Sorry to shift the topic of this thread.

RE: National PE License?

cb4,
You state... "I would like to differ on the "easier to eliminate industrial exemption" comment.  In my opinion, the industrial exemption has nothing to do with portability.  In my opinion, it has to do with certain industries/companies wanting worker bee engineers, not engineering professionals, in their employ, with its ramifications (which can include cost)."

Regarding the desire for "worker bee engineers, not engineering professionals", I'd like to offer the possibility that these firms do not feel there is a difference; hence, they have no desire either way.  Yes, subsidizing PE fees is an expense, but a minor one in my view.

Whether the degreed engineer is licensed or not, the quantity and quality of the work remains the same for the employer.  So, how would an employer in a manufacturing business that never encounters the need for a PE to sign and seal his own work ever get to a point of encouraging or discouraging the PE license.  In the absence of a need for the PE signature, I suspect the employer would be pretty much neutral on the issue.

My work is generally construction related and the submittal of drawings to clients and their engineerring consultants is very routine.  As such, many manufactured products have to bear a PE seal just to obtain building permits.  It looks to me that the "industrial exemption" is shrinking day by day, but I would like to hear what you and the others may offer in that regard.

Steve Braune
Tank Industry Consultants
www.tankindustry.com

RE: National PE License?

I am an engineering professional, not a worker bee, and not a PE.

I sign stuff off that will kill members of the public if it is done incorrectly, and mine is the /only/ technical signature on that report. Sure, there are other signatures on the report, but they are there for organisational reasons.

The /only/ difference in a  practical sense is that my external liability and responsibility is assumed by the company I work for.

Cheers

Greg Locock

RE: National PE License?

As I said, there are lots of very highly qualified and competent engineers that are not PEs (and of course unqualified ones that are).  I still believe that we would be better treated and paid, as a profession, if all engineers were required to be licensed professional engineers, similar to doctors and lawyers (i.e no industrial exemption).  

RE: National PE License?

(OP)

cb4,

Are you talking about no one performing engineering unless they are a PE?

Or are you talking about no one calling themselves engineers unless they are licensed (even though they do engineering)?

Right now 78% of the people doing engineering are not licensed. Since many PEs rise to managerial levels, it would actually be higher than 78%.

Please clarify your view.

RE: National PE License?

My view is it would be the same as doctors and lawyers.  You could not be called and engineer unless you had a PE.  You could, without a license, of course work as an intern, assistant, etc doing engineering work under the supervision of a licensed engineer.  So, essentially, my view is to be called an engineer one must be licensed (this is not inconsistent with present law in many states) and all work should be performed under the supervision of licensed professional engineers.  Think for example, of parallegals working with lawyers and various medical assistants and nurses working with medical doctors.  

I do not believe this is going to happen, and if it was to happen, it would have to be a long and probably complex transition process.  Clearly, you don't want to suddenly try to push engineers with 20 years experience, without having been required to pass a PE, to go out now and pass the exam to continue to do what they have been doing.

My point though was that I believe we would be better treated and paid as a profession in this scenario.

 

RE: National PE License?

I'm sure we all agree, to some extent. But, there seem little point on insisting on PE for all engineers when the PE process is broken at two fundamental levels.

(1) The PE exam. Hallo chaps, I've just spent X0000 dollars getting an accredited engineering degree, now you want to set me a multi-choice exam on some irrelevant disciplines using cook-book derived equations to see if I am academically qualified? Get real. Make the degree sufficiently rigorous so that in itself it contains all the necessary work - and if that includes a year learning how to do cook-book engineering, fine. That might even be useful. I'd have appreciated it.

(2) Personal liability in exempt industries. This is a bit more difficult, and I've mentioned it before. The crash performance of a production vehicle is dependent on the engineering work of between ten and several hundred engineers, many of whom are specialists, for three years before launch, and then for the life of the model, say 4 years. No one engineer could claim to have supervised all that work with a straight face. It is unlikely that one engineer would even work on that car for those seven years. The company's design process and manufacturing system is the thing that makes sure the car meets the crash regs, not some dude in an office with a license on the wall (to make a point somewhat aggressively).

Cheers

Greg Locock

RE: National PE License?

Mr. Locock,

I'm sure this is just one more response to already meaningless arguement at this point.  You and I could not possibly invest enough time and effort to convince enough people about the merits of the PE/PEng system.  Both seem to have pluses and minuses.  I guess it comes down to which system you tolerate.  On one hand you give the license away with the engineering degree.  On the other, you require a multiple guess exam format for licensure.  Both seem to satisfy their respective Jurisdictions, but not the practioners of the other type.  So, I guess we're each stuck until smarter folks than I solve this situation.

What still worries me though, neither system seems capable of keeping the incompetents out.  And, that is the flaw with any system.  So in the end, one would have to decide to abandon a flawed system for a differently flawed system.  Since the local Jurisdictions probably drive this train, I don't forsee much movement for a long time.

Steve Braune
Tank Industry Consultants
www.tankindustry.com

RE: National PE License?

If all engineers were required to be licensed to practice, they could lose their licenses for incompetancy (e.g. similar to disbarment).

GregLockett, in general, having a PE adds no more or less liability for your acts.  With respect to the auto industry example, I would like to see all of the engineers working on the project licensed.  Are they professionals, or not.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources