Shuttle fuel tanks
Shuttle fuel tanks
(OP)
Why do we not carry some of the large fuel tanks into low orbit to be used as part of ISS or the like? It would seem more economical than letting them burn up on reentry each time.
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS Come Join Us!Are you an
Engineering professional? Join Eng-Tips Forums!
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail. Posting GuidelinesJobs |
|
RE: Shuttle fuel tanks
TTFN
RE: Shuttle fuel tanks
A good resource you might want to check out is at:
http://www.space-frontier.org/Projects/ExternalTanks/
Good Luck
Bryan Carter
RE: Shuttle fuel tanks
As for cannibalizing a fuel tank, only if you're truly desperate. The shuttle tank outer skins are not vaccuum tight and were never meant to be. The inner tanks would require cutting to get doors, etc in them. There is no wiring or structural supports necessary for use in a space station or other application. It would be a monumental job to re-fit it for something else.
TTFN
RE: Shuttle fuel tanks
If the goal were to get large cylinders into orbit to use for a space station then using the fuel tanks would be energy efficient. It has been considered. But converting a cryogenic tank into living quarters while in orbit is not trivial. One day it may be done, but not with the Space Shuttle.
RE: Shuttle fuel tanks
I'd be surprised if we ever see another satellite launched from the shuttle at all.
Expendable fuel tanks do seem wasteful, but at a total cost of about $500 million per launch, it may not be a major cost component. They should spend the money finding a way to keep the @#$%#$ foam from falling off.
RE: Shuttle fuel tanks
... the reason is: Dead weight, as a counterweight, allows a "mini-Shuttle" (MAKS, Pioneer, Space Van) to use a tether ... Space Van, for instance, is a reusable Delta/Centaur adaptation designed 20 years ago with a payload of about 1500 pounds ... plus or minus 2000. The latter fact is WHY these things do not get Bank backing.
But a tether, adding 5000 pounds, does not JUST make more payload, but wipes out the considerable risk of getting, well ... negative cargo.
You need about a dozen ETs.
The loss of Shuttle cargo is considerable, especially for (Space) Station as the orbit is higher than where the ET is normally ditched (if I remember, about 3-4,000 lb.) -- plus you would want it in a HIGHER orbit than Station, so you would want a small engine, partly using residual gas in the Tank (840 lb Oxygen alone).