We are running Solidworks 2003, and
We are running Solidworks 2003, and
(OP)
We are running Solidworks 2003, and currently do not have a pdm system. My question is, is there a way in Solidworks to do a parts where used? This is the same function that is in Solidworks explorer. Currently we use find references to find all files that are used to build the top level. It would be nice if we had something similar to find all top level files that a part is used in. Does anyone know of a way in SolidWorks, or have a marco (api)?
Thanks
Thanks






RE: We are running Solidworks 2003, and
RE: We are running Solidworks 2003, and
CorBlimeyLimey
Barrie, Ontario
FAQ559-863
RE: We are running Solidworks 2003, and
RE: We are running Solidworks 2003, and
That gets pretty easy. Other than making some API program I think you might be SOL. (No offense)
Regards,
Scott Baugh, CSWP

http://www.3dvisiontech.com
http://www.scottjbaugh.com
FAQ731-376
RE: We are running Solidworks 2003, and
I'd suggest you slap 'em up the side of the head with a 2x4 a few times. Ie. Tell them here are the procedures you will use and if you don't, you will not get a good review and raise next year - works every time. Heck you are paying them to do as the company wants, not what they fancy doing themselves.
I was - and he did. So at least I didn't get coal.....
RE: We are running Solidworks 2003, and
RE: We are running Solidworks 2003, and
CorBlimeyLimey
Barrie, Ontario
FAQ559-863
RE: We are running Solidworks 2003, and
Scott Baugh, CSWP

http://www.3dvisiontech.com
http://www.scottjbaugh.com
FAQ731-376
RE: We are running Solidworks 2003, and
CorBlimeyLimey
Barrie, Ontario
FAQ559-863
RE: We are running Solidworks 2003, and
Joking apart. I really do think that it seems to be a laziness and lack of procedures problem. Are you guys going for ISO9000 or AS9100? If so, as whisper in the auditor's ear would cause the problem to get fixed real quick.
I was - and he did. So at least I didn't get coal.....
RE: We are running Solidworks 2003, and
As far as processes go, we have been using Solidworks for under a year. I think we have come along way in a short time, and recognize that we still have a long way to go.
Give me a break, we are still learning.
RE: We are running Solidworks 2003, and
Lighten up!!! Don't take the jokes so personal, many of us are in the same boat when it comes to cutbacks, downsizing & workloads. A little levity can go a long way!
"but trying to get everyone else to check is the problem. If you don't make it easy then they don't do it.
The point that was being made was that feature you are looking for already exists in SW Explorer & is very simple & easy to use. If it is adopted as company policy & practice it should be used & adhered to as should any other company procedure or standard. Try working in an automotive, aeronautic or government environment & see what happens if procedures are not followed. It's their way or the Highway.
Have fun while you learn!
CorBlimeyLimey
Barrie, Ontario
FAQ559-863
RE: We are running Solidworks 2003, and
Also, in all fairness, I would think that even allowing for the workload this is important enough to enforce some procedures. You would think that in your (albeit unfortunate) circumstances people would consider making the effort and following the rules or they might be next to be next in line to be downsized. It almost seems like they have given up - though I know that layoff's, poor sales and downsizing, etc. do hurt morale and motivation. You might try to find some inexpensive thing to improve morale. You would be surprised what small, simple things do work. In fact sometimes its the simple little gestures that seem to work best. When times are tough even the silliest little things can either hurt or help beyond all logical explanation.
I was - and he did. So at least I didn't get coal.....
OK, OK, It's a reference to my holiday sig. "Be naughty - Save Santa a trip..."