×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

ASTM A53 Type F, identifying

ASTM A53 Type F, identifying

ASTM A53 Type F, identifying

(OP)
Is there a way to identify pipe in the field as ASTM A53 Type F (Furnace welded) by simply inspecting its exterior or interior?  I would expect that the seam would be visible but would it look any different than Type E (Electric resistance welded)?

If it can't be identified by simple inspection, how would one identify it?  I expect that cutting a cross section through the wall would reveal the seam joining method.

Thanks

RE: ASTM A53 Type F, identifying

Even though this is one of the most common pipe specs in use under 4" it normally carries no marking other than a stencil and some times not even that.

I looked at very few cross sections of A53F but I remember that in one case the weld was angled, more lap than a butt.  A lot of the times I seen where the weld hadn't been smoothed out on the inside, there was a small protrusion at the weld.  Also I’ve see a shallow groove on the outside
at the weld, especially true on the 1 1/2" and 2" galvanized.

I looked at the pipe a pipping supply co and there were no markings on the pipe other than a  tag on the straps holding the bundle togather stating that it was A53F. This was true of both the black and galvanized.

RE: ASTM A53 Type F, identifying

(OP)
Thanks Unclesyd,

Your feedback will be extremely useful.  I have to inspect a ship where type F has potentially been used (by mistake, installer not knowing any better) in fuel oil and some low pressure hydraulic systems.  Type F is not allowed (by ABS and USCG) in systems conveying combustible fluids.  I'd hate to recommend removing the pipe and cutting a cross section only to find out its ERW or Seamless.   

RE: ASTM A53 Type F, identifying

Marineram,
I've encountered the same problem in chemical piping but was fortunate enough to "when in doubt cut it out".  Being on a ship I would imagine its' been painted so if one did stencil it the message is lost.  

I called a friend at a local shipyard and asked him about how he handled this problem.  He stated that they don't allow A53F on the yard just for the reasons you state.  They build a number of passenger carrying boats and have to have pretty close tabs on material.  This is odd as a piping supply house that carries the A53F is across the street.

I would call a reputable supplier that supplies the pipe and see if they may have some quick method of identifying the pipe.  In the US someone like Chicago Tube might be able to help.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources