×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

HGL calculations

HGL calculations

HGL calculations

(OP)
I'm doing HGL calcs for a series of storm sewer pipes.  It is my understanding that you need to check for both inlet control and outlet control of each storm sewer segment (from one junction to the next).

For outlet control I am adding friction losses and junction losses to my starting HGL from the previous segment.  For inlet control I am using HDS-5 nomographs to get an HW/D.  Whichever gives me the higher elevation I choose as the HGL for that particular junction.  I have found that my inlet control check is regularly the higher (controlling) elevation.  

I am concerned that I may be oversizing my pipes.  When I check Manning's Eqn for pipe capacity I get relatively large Q's as compared to the Q's I'm getting into my pipes through inlet control.  It seems to me that HDS-5 inlet control nomographs are extremely conservative for storm sewer design since the velocity and 'channelization' of the incoming flow through a junction are not taken into account.  Is there a more reasonable check for inlet control?  Thanks for any suggestions.

RE: HGL calculations

It sounds like you are counting entrance losses twice.  The losses through a structure should be applied as a coefficient to the exit velocity head (the v1 term in Bernoulli's) from that structure.  The previous pipe is controlled by its own entrance conditions, minus its friction losses.  The HDS tables (which I too have always found to be ultra-conservative, but alas seem to be universally accepted) are meant to be applied to a quantity of water waiting to get into an entrance...like a headwall in the terminal end of a channel.  I don't think they are even applicable to water already moving through a pipe network.

RE: HGL calculations

A good source for storm drain analysis is HEC-22 From the Federal Highways Admin. FHWA. You can download it in pdf format from:

http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/hydpub.htm

I would review the proceedures outlined in HEC-22 IT should help you alot.

RE: HGL calculations

I agree with lha it sounds like you are counting the loss twice.  I believe that you want to use the friction velocity for the loss calculations.  This would be closer to the actual flow in the pipe once friction is accounted for.  

I generally do an initial sizing with mannings and then plot start at the outlet crown (assuming no TW) for a conservative estimate.  Then I plot the friction slope to the next upstream structure and compute the loss at the structure, plot the loss and then continue upstream along the friction slope.

It is a quick and dirty approach.  I find that many engineers do not show the velocity once friction is accounted for.  If you don't do this you may get a higher velocity when in reality the velocity is below minimum (typically you want 3-4 fps as a minimum).

RE: HGL calculations

(OP)
Thanks for the advice so far.  I'm going to go through the procedures in HEC-22 this weekend.  gbam thanks for the reference.

SiPaul, I did what you suggested for HGL up through the pipes and junctions as you suggested.  And from what I understand so far, this works fine until you get to a point where the pipe isn't surcharged.  Once you get to a point where there is a free water surface, a different approach is required to determine HGL.  I suppose I could use the HDS-5 nomograph to conservatively estimate HGL at this point.  However, I think it's too conservative.  Hopefully HEC-22 will clear this up...

RE: HGL calculations

HDS-5 is for culverts, a single pipe through an embankment, not for storm sewers.   Use the procedures described in DEC-22 for storm sewer systems.

RE: HGL calculations

I agree that HEC-22 will give the most complete procedure for HGL computations.  If the pipe is not surcharged the HGL won't fall below the normal depth.  Usually, you take the HGL along the friction slope until it intersects the normal depth and then continue along the depth until the next structure.

I am curious if anyone has an easy way to deal with the friction velocity issue?  If you compute the velocity using mannings you get a higher velocity.  In other words, the velocity upstream of a 1000' pipe will be far less then a 20' pipe for the same conditions (slope, Q etc).

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources