×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

The American economy will remain strong because....
15

The American economy will remain strong because....

The American economy will remain strong because....

(OP)
Assess the validity of this statementz;

The American economy will remain strong because we are a nation of spenders. This continual flow of money for goods will keep a strong service sector going for many years. While we don't have all the benefits of a great number of manufacturing jobs, we will have a increasingly larger proportion of service jobs.

Never mind the trade deficits, because where will China and India sell all their goods, if the US is not buying?

The American as the worlds most avid consumer is saving the economy by spending spending spending (while I secretly hoard my money and preach for others to spend!)

I know this is greatly oversimplified, but what do you think?

RE: The American economy will remain strong because....

I'm wondering where we will get all that money we're going to spend.

RE: The American economy will remain strong because....

EngineerDave, I think you have accurately summed up governmental economists' current thinking on the matter.  For that matter, the trend to a servce based economy has been championed for more than 30 years.

So, someone needs to define what a healthy economy would be...  Booming stock market?  Steady increase in inflation adjusted buying power of the middle class?  Is the discussion limited to the US?

RE: The American economy will remain strong because....

Service Sector???  How does one survive and raise a family on $8/hr to $11/hr, minimum if any benefits, and many times the jobs are part time or on-call --- I guess there are some who can????? It's not the kind of life I like to envision for my children and grand children.

I'm in California and the service sector folks really struggle for a simple existance here. Even higher paid folks have a hard time in CA

RE: The American economy will remain strong because....

2
I am not an economist, but I believe that a healthy economy is one in which revenue equals spending. If not so, at one time the bubble will burst. Spending and spending is not the answer. And the problem is not limited to USA - it is global. Many other countries are developing faster, and in time probably the economic order will change.

The Roman empire was a great consumer with colonies providing the necessary goods and labour. The British empire sustained the industrial revolution and its wealth based on colonies' work. They both disappeared. Why we don't learn from past history?

RE: The American economy will remain strong because....

(OP)
Yeah, but anymore most manufacturing jobs are only at glorified service sector wages, plus the opportunity for overtime.

If I read this board everyday, I get more depressed.

RE: The American economy will remain strong because....

EngineerDave,

Don't be depressed, at least these posts show that there are more than just a few folks who CARE about what is happening to our country and economy. Probably most people to some degree.

Unfortunately there isn't a strong enough network of us to influence the U.S. gov't the way special interest groups can. Thus laws and organizations are created to benefit only a few of the wealthy here and not the population as a whole. i.e. NAFTA, WTO, FTAA.

RE: The American economy will remain strong because....

2
I took a course in macroeconomics in school, all I remember from it is I was bored silly. So my view point is simplistic, ignorant, and probably flat out wrong but here goes anyways.

Strikes me that some of the most spectacular economic failures have been at least partially due to isolationism and protectionism, whether voluntary or enforced (Cuba, North Korea, Iraq, Soviet Union in it's death throws, Mexico 10 years back, Japan now)whereas some of the best economic results have been acheived by countries lowering tariff barriers and cutting subsidies (Ireland, New Zealand, and Canada).

RE: The American economy will remain strong because....

The truth is that design/manufacturing will shrink more because we are "working ourselves out from the jobs." Faster, cheaper and better will wipe out jobs similarly as agricultural jobs were reduced from 20% (in the old good times) to 3% today. There is no stop to this shrinkage no matter what kind of political system we adopt.

I agree with Hush that open markets could be the answer to maintaining at least the design/manufacturing where we have the edge and still make money. It does not make sense to produce oranges in Canada to just have Canadian products.

RE: The American economy will remain strong because....

Like any individual ailing rust belt company, the U.S. as a whole needs to produce things that the rest of the world's consumers can and will buy, be it service or product.

"Great ideas need landing gear as well as wings."--C. D. Jackson

RE: The American economy will remain strong because....

Like missile guidance systems, nuclear reactor technology and Harleys!  Oh, and McD's franchises and Enfamil for babies in countries where the water isn't safe.  No, I'm sure there must be something else...

RE: The American economy will remain strong because....

Going to a service economy may be fine.  My question is how do you sustain the U.S negative trade deficit indefinitely?   Seems to me that something has to give at some point.

RE: The American economy will remain strong because....

I see the economy as a big bucket of water.  You can stir that bucket as fast as you can (i.e. stimulate spending/economic activitly).

But, the bucket has a hole in it - the trade deficit, over $400 billion lost from the country this year alone.

You can stir that bucket all you want, eventually, if you don't plug that leak, there's going to be nothing left to stir.

Having a trade deficit with one country, like China, is one thing, but when we have a net trade deficit with the whole world, it's a slow recipe for failure.  And, every year, more of the "new economy" "knowledge worker" jobs that were supposed to help refill that bucket are being sent away and making additional holes.

On a related note - I read today that the retailers are looking at big dissapointments for the Christmas shopping season.  It amazes me that the same Wall Street guys who praise the Wal-marts and IBM's for cutting Americans out of jobs are then surprised that Americans feeling insecure about the remaining jobs (or just out of work altogether) aren't spending money on more stuff.  And lets face it, just about everything we buy in America these days, particularly from oversees, is stuff we really don't need.  Business is out to kill its own golden goose.

Edward L. Klein
Pipe Stress Engineer
Houston, Texas

All opinions expressed here are my own and not my company's.

RE: The American economy will remain strong because....

2
If the Holiday retail sales end up in a downturn don't allow yourself to be completly hauled in by the notion it's an indicator of the economy. The market and the economy are two different areas. They do relate at some graphic intersections. If the Holiday retail sales end down, I'd put the cause on consumer credit card debt. Like maxed out. This nation is made up of a lot of spenders that have gotten themselves into a cycle of paycheck to credit card to paycheck. Payments on these cards are minimum. There are six different ways credit card companies can figure the same purchase. Daily balance. Average daily balance, etc. What's in your wallet? Spending is a habit and saving is a habit. The US consumer has some very bad habits.

RE: The American economy will remain strong because....

Interesting.  The radio announced a growth in GDP for the third quarter of something like 8 percent.  Highest growth rate in 20 years.  Same ABC announcer was talking up job growth and wage increases.  That was a day or two ago.  Last night the local Fox TV affiliate ran a segment about how poorly retail sales is doing this holiday season.  The talking head actually talked about how much better off we were for all the cheap goods available.  Quoted prices for electronics and bicycles.  The news segment almost came off as an infomercial for retail stores.

So, shouldn't we be spending money like drunken sailors?  Maybe Bush could get the federal government to forgive all credit card debt in the US.  Maybe that would get retail sales going again.

RE: The American economy will remain strong because....

2
It's funny, I took micro, macro and engineering economics and it seems like most people in our country don't remember anything taught in any of these courses.  StressGuy hit it on the head.  This country runs a continuous trade deficit, meaning we by more products from oversees than other people buy from us.  Since the stockmarket collapse of 2000-2001 foreign investment is also significantly down.  The world is draining us and we are not injecting any money into the economy by producing enough grants for R&D that would lead to products that everyone else wants to buy.

The only thing never taught in any of my courses is how the Fed is responsible for injecting money into the system.  If grants rely on tax dollars only and there is no net flow of money into our country, then how will R&D eventually be paid for?  It seems to me the government must become more involved in supporting research through feduciary assistance other than providing money to banks for loans.  In a time when the country appears to be hemorrhaging fiscally, what is Greenspan doing, and what can be done to offset shrinking tax revenues (outside of raising taxes)?  If the present cuts in research dollars and the evaporation of venture capital continue, you can kiss our technological edge goodbye.  No new products or technologies means no net or even balanced revenues.  The country must maintain diversity, if we all become grabage men and front desk clerks, how on earth will we expect to balance our spending/revenue sheet!?

RE: The American economy will remain strong because....

2
An on-line friend of mine wrote:

"The question is do you trust markets (product markets, labor markets etc.) to adjust quickly enough to ensure an equilibrium in which those markets clear at an adequate level.

Economic theory says that if markets function well enough, they will clear at a competitive price. Now if manufacturing jobs are too expensive in one area (and it is not absolute expense which matters, so no, not all jobs will go to China because you have to factor in relative productivity and other cost factors) they will be migrated, which is an eufemism for people will loose their jobs in one area and get new jobs in the other.

The displaced workers in area A (let's say for arguments sake this is America) will now have to seek new jobs at a new wage rate determined by their skill level in a new area of work. This is a painful process.

If area A does not create sufficient new jobs in other market segments (not necessarily services, it can be higher grade manufacturing), the price of labor in area A will drop in order to adjust and clear the market at the new price level.

But in this case, the USA is very effective in creating new jobs in higher value added segments. Apart from a business cycle slump, there is no structural stagnation in the US economy. And, as all consumers can now buy the manufacturing products from area C (let's say China) at a lower price, their overall buying power increases and their demand for other products and services, many of them created in the USA, will go up.

Take the example of the steel tarrifs. By artificially attempting to stop the migration of US steel jobs to other areas, the price of steel in the US went up. Sectors using steel as a an input product had to pay a higher price for their materials, and became less competitive as a result. As these sectors like car manufacturers are much larger than the steel industry, the effect of the steel tarrifs has been a net loss of jobs in the USA.

The same goes with the manufacturing jobs going to China, and the service jobs going to India. As long as the US stays competitive as a whole, this is a net benefit to the US economy. In addition, as the buying power of these other countries rises, their demand for all kinds of products, many of them made in the US, will go up. The entire world economy, including the US, benefits. This is not a zero sum game, but a question of globally optimising the use of inputs including labor.

Don't fall for scare mongery. Trade is good for everyone, and the loss of jobs to China is acceptable, if there are no market disturbances that prevent the clearing of markets. So, if the Chinese are manipulating the value of the remnibi (which they are) there may be cause for concern.

Just two words of caution:

- People that are being hit with this displacement are always in a world of pain - there's no denying that. Economic theory is fine, losing your job is not.

- All this hinges on efficiently operating markets - which may not always be the case. If there are significant market disturbances, better double check your assumptions. "

Cheers

Greg Locock

RE: The American economy will remain strong because....

In my opionion we are going to face some very serious economic times. My only worry is that the big problems won't happen until after the 2004 election. Which will mean that we might be stuck with a president who can't come up with real economic answers. Only tax cuts to the most wealthy. I think that most of the wealthy used the tax cuts to invest in overseas business which only resulted in more lost jobs.

We need to build an economy like the one we had in the 1990's. One in which the government tried to balance the budget as best they could. During that time an average uneducated person working in a manufacturing or service job could usually achieve a middle class lifestyle. The latest trend however has been that the rich have been getting richer and the number of people living in poverty has been getting higher. This trend is only going to get worse as we try to raise the bottom line a little higher and ship all of our good jobs overseas.

RE: The American economy will remain strong because....

As a matter of interest, has the poverty line tracked COLA or has it remained at the 1990 level? If the objective standard of living that defines poverty has not shifted, and the number below it has increased, then I think you have a valid case.

On the other hand, if, as I suspect, the poor have not improved their standard of living as quickly as the rich, then I think you are on very dodgy ground.

Cheers

Greg Locock

RE: The American economy will remain strong because....

Nice post, psnowhill.

Two questions.  First, does anyone remember when the method used to calculate inflation and COLAs in the US was changed and what the changes were?

Second, have there been major improvements by the US to protect intellectual property?  Why would anyone invest in new product or software development if it was clear the development would be pirated and with no consequence to the thief?  (Or thief's nation...)

Happy New Year to All!

RE: The American economy will remain strong because....

I think part of the problem is trying to take free market capitalism as it worked in the United States for the 20th century and expanding it to a world wide application.

There are a couple of major problems that I see with the translation - labor mobility and standards.

In the U.S., we have high labor mobility.  If I lose my job in Houston or the company I work for goes out of business, I can send my resume to California, New York, or Florida to compete for another job because I can relocate there without much difficulty.  The language is the same.  And, while the cost of living varies across the country, it is not so much that I couldn't take it into account and adjust.

As for standards - a lot a people have died in the last century so we can enjoy the kinds of labor and environmental protections standards that we have, along with programs like social security, unemployment insurance, etc.

To be certain, the various states compete using incentives/tax breaks, etc to lure businesses with the idea that the job created will more than pay back the revenue "lost" from the tax breaks.  Still, all the states know that they compete under the same umbrella of wager, labor, and environmental standards.

None of this framework exists on a global scale, so countries like India and China that have nothing like the standards of living we have come to expect in the U.S. are in a position to severely undercut costs of U.S. labor.  Are we to say that they are "more efficient" becuase of this?  If so, it certainly spells a bad outlook for the future of most Americans.

I would agree that, if things were to "clear" as they are supposed to, new jobs would be created and new industries arise to replace the jobs lost and the balance of trade would remain.  But it's not, the U.S. is running a trade deficit with the world on the order of hundreds of billions of dollars and I haven't seen anything to suggest that this will change until the U.S. standard of living drops to the point that we can't afford to spend money that quickly (to go back to my leaking bucket, the hole is somewhere up the side.  Eventually, after so much has been lost, the level will be too low for anymore to leak out.

When it comes down to it, what incentive is there for a company to locate any kind of R&D center in the United States?

Edward L. Klein
Pipe Stress Engineer
Houston, Texas

All opinions expressed here are my own and not my company's.

RE: The American economy will remain strong because....

2
I guess the big question for this board is then as an engineer in America, what specialty and education do you need to sustain a high income level and avoid being bypassed by outsourcing?  From my perspective it looks like all R&D and test engineering can be outsourced to India and China for cheaper. What does that leave here but local construction management, testifying as an engineering expert witness in our courts, managing engineering groups overseas and conducting local market reasearch and sales.  Not much fun engineering stuff left after that.

RE: The American economy will remain strong because....

pvh:
there are a number of growing fields in the practice engineering , which we should all consider studying for, since they are immune to outsourcing:
a) pyro-bovine engineer- flip burgers on a grill
b)sanitary engineer- clean bedpans at a nursing home
c)packaging engineer- fill grocery bags at A+P

RE: The American economy will remain strong because....

Since the "jobless recovery" is causing Dubbya some grief in the poles, he is evidently considering classifying burger flippers as Industrial jobs!    Check out this link to Schumer's response.  http://www.senate.gov/~schumer/SchumerWebsite/pressroom/press_releases/PR02454.html

This is Dubbya's answer?  After creating something like 20,000 jobs instead of the predicted 200,000 in the last month?  Even a creation of 200,000 jobs would be a drop in the unemploment bucket, at this point.  

Not that I think Kerry would be any better....

RE: The American economy will remain strong because....

Wealth is created by taking an object of some lessor utility, such as flint and laboring to create a product fo greater utility, such as a spear. Service industries, such as spear polishers, are useful as long as there are spears to be polished. I know it this sound simplistic, but it is basic economics. A strong manufacturing economy supports a strong service economy. If  the manufacturing moves away, the service industry will eventually follow it. Manufacturing, which provides a wide varity of jobs for a varity of skills and provides many avenues of advancement. In the mid '80s manufacting was something like 295 of the economy. Now it is around 12%. In terms of per hour cost American workers are one of the most expensive. In terms of cost of units produced they are the least expensive. We can be competative in a global market. We need to rebuild our manufacturing base NOW. We can not as a nation spend our selves to wealth any more we can as individuals spend our way to wealth, We need to create value. (to answer the orginal post)

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources