The American economy will remain strong because....
The American economy will remain strong because....
(OP)
Assess the validity of this statementz;
The American economy will remain strong because we are a nation of spenders. This continual flow of money for goods will keep a strong service sector going for many years. While we don't have all the benefits of a great number of manufacturing jobs, we will have a increasingly larger proportion of service jobs.
Never mind the trade deficits, because where will China and India sell all their goods, if the US is not buying?
The American as the worlds most avid consumer is saving the economy by spending spending spending (while I secretly hoard my money and preach for others to spend!)
I know this is greatly oversimplified, but what do you think?
The American economy will remain strong because we are a nation of spenders. This continual flow of money for goods will keep a strong service sector going for many years. While we don't have all the benefits of a great number of manufacturing jobs, we will have a increasingly larger proportion of service jobs.
Never mind the trade deficits, because where will China and India sell all their goods, if the US is not buying?
The American as the worlds most avid consumer is saving the economy by spending spending spending (while I secretly hoard my money and preach for others to spend!)
I know this is greatly oversimplified, but what do you think?





RE: The American economy will remain strong because....
RE: The American economy will remain strong because....
So, someone needs to define what a healthy economy would be... Booming stock market? Steady increase in inflation adjusted buying power of the middle class? Is the discussion limited to the US?
RE: The American economy will remain strong because....
I'm in California and the service sector folks really struggle for a simple existance here. Even higher paid folks have a hard time in CA
RE: The American economy will remain strong because....
The Roman empire was a great consumer with colonies providing the necessary goods and labour. The British empire sustained the industrial revolution and its wealth based on colonies' work. They both disappeared. Why we don't learn from past history?
RE: The American economy will remain strong because....
If I read this board everyday, I get more depressed.
RE: The American economy will remain strong because....
Don't be depressed, at least these posts show that there are more than just a few folks who CARE about what is happening to our country and economy. Probably most people to some degree.
Unfortunately there isn't a strong enough network of us to influence the U.S. gov't the way special interest groups can. Thus laws and organizations are created to benefit only a few of the wealthy here and not the population as a whole. i.e. NAFTA, WTO, FTAA.
RE: The American economy will remain strong because....
Strikes me that some of the most spectacular economic failures have been at least partially due to isolationism and protectionism, whether voluntary or enforced (Cuba, North Korea, Iraq, Soviet Union in it's death throws, Mexico 10 years back, Japan now)whereas some of the best economic results have been acheived by countries lowering tariff barriers and cutting subsidies (Ireland, New Zealand, and Canada).
RE: The American economy will remain strong because....
I agree with Hush that open markets could be the answer to maintaining at least the design/manufacturing where we have the edge and still make money. It does not make sense to produce oranges in Canada to just have Canadian products.
RE: The American economy will remain strong because....
RE: The American economy will remain strong because....
RE: The American economy will remain strong because....
RE: The American economy will remain strong because....
But, the bucket has a hole in it - the trade deficit, over $400 billion lost from the country this year alone.
You can stir that bucket all you want, eventually, if you don't plug that leak, there's going to be nothing left to stir.
Having a trade deficit with one country, like China, is one thing, but when we have a net trade deficit with the whole world, it's a slow recipe for failure. And, every year, more of the "new economy" "knowledge worker" jobs that were supposed to help refill that bucket are being sent away and making additional holes.
On a related note - I read today that the retailers are looking at big dissapointments for the Christmas shopping season. It amazes me that the same Wall Street guys who praise the Wal-marts and IBM's for cutting Americans out of jobs are then surprised that Americans feeling insecure about the remaining jobs (or just out of work altogether) aren't spending money on more stuff. And lets face it, just about everything we buy in America these days, particularly from oversees, is stuff we really don't need. Business is out to kill its own golden goose.
Edward L. Klein
Pipe Stress Engineer
Houston, Texas
All opinions expressed here are my own and not my company's.
RE: The American economy will remain strong because....
RE: The American economy will remain strong because....
So, shouldn't we be spending money like drunken sailors? Maybe Bush could get the federal government to forgive all credit card debt in the US. Maybe that would get retail sales going again.
RE: The American economy will remain strong because....
The only thing never taught in any of my courses is how the Fed is responsible for injecting money into the system. If grants rely on tax dollars only and there is no net flow of money into our country, then how will R&D eventually be paid for? It seems to me the government must become more involved in supporting research through feduciary assistance other than providing money to banks for loans. In a time when the country appears to be hemorrhaging fiscally, what is Greenspan doing, and what can be done to offset shrinking tax revenues (outside of raising taxes)? If the present cuts in research dollars and the evaporation of venture capital continue, you can kiss our technological edge goodbye. No new products or technologies means no net or even balanced revenues. The country must maintain diversity, if we all become grabage men and front desk clerks, how on earth will we expect to balance our spending/revenue sheet!?
RE: The American economy will remain strong because....
"The question is do you trust markets (product markets, labor markets etc.) to adjust quickly enough to ensure an equilibrium in which those markets clear at an adequate level.
Economic theory says that if markets function well enough, they will clear at a competitive price. Now if manufacturing jobs are too expensive in one area (and it is not absolute expense which matters, so no, not all jobs will go to China because you have to factor in relative productivity and other cost factors) they will be migrated, which is an eufemism for people will loose their jobs in one area and get new jobs in the other.
The displaced workers in area A (let's say for arguments sake this is America) will now have to seek new jobs at a new wage rate determined by their skill level in a new area of work. This is a painful process.
If area A does not create sufficient new jobs in other market segments (not necessarily services, it can be higher grade manufacturing), the price of labor in area A will drop in order to adjust and clear the market at the new price level.
But in this case, the USA is very effective in creating new jobs in higher value added segments. Apart from a business cycle slump, there is no structural stagnation in the US economy. And, as all consumers can now buy the manufacturing products from area C (let's say China) at a lower price, their overall buying power increases and their demand for other products and services, many of them created in the USA, will go up.
Take the example of the steel tarrifs. By artificially attempting to stop the migration of US steel jobs to other areas, the price of steel in the US went up. Sectors using steel as a an input product had to pay a higher price for their materials, and became less competitive as a result. As these sectors like car manufacturers are much larger than the steel industry, the effect of the steel tarrifs has been a net loss of jobs in the USA.
The same goes with the manufacturing jobs going to China, and the service jobs going to India. As long as the US stays competitive as a whole, this is a net benefit to the US economy. In addition, as the buying power of these other countries rises, their demand for all kinds of products, many of them made in the US, will go up. The entire world economy, including the US, benefits. This is not a zero sum game, but a question of globally optimising the use of inputs including labor.
Don't fall for scare mongery. Trade is good for everyone, and the loss of jobs to China is acceptable, if there are no market disturbances that prevent the clearing of markets. So, if the Chinese are manipulating the value of the remnibi (which they are) there may be cause for concern.
Just two words of caution:
- People that are being hit with this displacement are always in a world of pain - there's no denying that. Economic theory is fine, losing your job is not.
- All this hinges on efficiently operating markets - which may not always be the case. If there are significant market disturbances, better double check your assumptions. "
Cheers
Greg Locock
RE: The American economy will remain strong because....
We need to build an economy like the one we had in the 1990's. One in which the government tried to balance the budget as best they could. During that time an average uneducated person working in a manufacturing or service job could usually achieve a middle class lifestyle. The latest trend however has been that the rich have been getting richer and the number of people living in poverty has been getting higher. This trend is only going to get worse as we try to raise the bottom line a little higher and ship all of our good jobs overseas.
RE: The American economy will remain strong because....
On the other hand, if, as I suspect, the poor have not improved their standard of living as quickly as the rich, then I think you are on very dodgy ground.
Cheers
Greg Locock
RE: The American economy will remain strong because....
Two questions. First, does anyone remember when the method used to calculate inflation and COLAs in the US was changed and what the changes were?
Second, have there been major improvements by the US to protect intellectual property? Why would anyone invest in new product or software development if it was clear the development would be pirated and with no consequence to the thief? (Or thief's nation...)
Happy New Year to All!
RE: The American economy will remain strong because....
There are a couple of major problems that I see with the translation - labor mobility and standards.
In the U.S., we have high labor mobility. If I lose my job in Houston or the company I work for goes out of business, I can send my resume to California, New York, or Florida to compete for another job because I can relocate there without much difficulty. The language is the same. And, while the cost of living varies across the country, it is not so much that I couldn't take it into account and adjust.
As for standards - a lot a people have died in the last century so we can enjoy the kinds of labor and environmental protections standards that we have, along with programs like social security, unemployment insurance, etc.
To be certain, the various states compete using incentives/tax breaks, etc to lure businesses with the idea that the job created will more than pay back the revenue "lost" from the tax breaks. Still, all the states know that they compete under the same umbrella of wager, labor, and environmental standards.
None of this framework exists on a global scale, so countries like India and China that have nothing like the standards of living we have come to expect in the U.S. are in a position to severely undercut costs of U.S. labor. Are we to say that they are "more efficient" becuase of this? If so, it certainly spells a bad outlook for the future of most Americans.
I would agree that, if things were to "clear" as they are supposed to, new jobs would be created and new industries arise to replace the jobs lost and the balance of trade would remain. But it's not, the U.S. is running a trade deficit with the world on the order of hundreds of billions of dollars and I haven't seen anything to suggest that this will change until the U.S. standard of living drops to the point that we can't afford to spend money that quickly (to go back to my leaking bucket, the hole is somewhere up the side. Eventually, after so much has been lost, the level will be too low for anymore to leak out.
When it comes down to it, what incentive is there for a company to locate any kind of R&D center in the United States?
Edward L. Klein
Pipe Stress Engineer
Houston, Texas
All opinions expressed here are my own and not my company's.
RE: The American economy will remain strong because....
RE: The American economy will remain strong because....
there are a number of growing fields in the practice engineering , which we should all consider studying for, since they are immune to outsourcing:
a) pyro-bovine engineer- flip burgers on a grill
b)sanitary engineer- clean bedpans at a nursing home
c)packaging engineer- fill grocery bags at A+P
RE: The American economy will remain strong because....
This is Dubbya's answer? After creating something like 20,000 jobs instead of the predicted 200,000 in the last month? Even a creation of 200,000 jobs would be a drop in the unemploment bucket, at this point.
Not that I think Kerry would be any better....
RE: The American economy will remain strong because....