×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Flow Regimes

Flow Regimes

Flow Regimes

(OP)
Could someone explain the difference between Laminar Flow and Streamline Flow and in so doing enlighten my ignorance?

My confusion has arisen from the observations I have made regarding fluid flow through narrow passageways in fluid filled enclosed channels.
Here the Reynolds number is high, suggesting turbulent flow but the fluid appears not to mix and appears to flow without turbulence.

I described this to a college who simply said the flow regime was streamline.

So is streamline flow turbulent or laminar or can it be both?
What thermodynamics am I missing?

RE: Flow Regimes

Fog1, When it comes to the Reynolds no., how high is high?There is a flow regime know as "transitional" where the flow can be either, turbulent or laminar. Your system may be operating in this region.

saxon

RE: Flow Regimes

(OP)
Hello Saxon,

The Reynolds number as the fluid enters the system is approx 91000, well over the tanditional 10000 mark.

As the flow is then divided the overall Fd still suggests turbulance as it squirts down each passageway. The Fd of each pasageway is still sufficiently high to suggest turbulance.

The flow, as far as I can tell is not in some transitional phase and appears to the camera as lamina!!!

Streamline = Laminar is that correct in terms of the description?

RE: Flow Regimes

I've not heard of "streamline" flow as anything more than laminar flow.  Here's a reference:
http://www.tpub.com/content/engine/14105/css/14105_26.h...

I'd suggest verifying the constants used to calculate Reynolds #, and if you're sure it's turbulent, then I'd suggest that turbulent does not necessarily indicate that mixing is going to occur.  In fact, I'd be surprised if significant mixing occured in short runs of turbulent flow.  Getting two media to mix well is not necessarily as simple as creating turbulent flow in a straight pipe.  Perhaps after going through some elbows and other restrictions, a significant amount of mixing will occur.  I'm not an expert on this.

Have you searched the web on turbulent mixing?

RE: Flow Regimes

(OP)
Saxon,

The Reynolds number is well above 10000 at the entrance to the system.

The Fd value is also high at the entrance to the system.

Turbulent in but through the channels does it become laminar? Fd reduces.

What is the difference between laminar and streamline flow??? Is there one??? Do both descriptions describe the same thing ??

RE: Flow Regimes

(OP)
Sorry Saxon I couldn't see your first reply our indeed that of my own but now I can.

I've searched the web without success, there seems no in depth revelations that point me in the right directions.

I am sure that in the narrow passageways, which are long compared to the entrance section, the flow does go laminar.

What has caused my confusion is a college saying that it can’t be laminar, suggesting that its streamline flow, then leaving for a week without further expansion or debate.

OK fine streamline it is, maybe, but what is meant by streamline? Is it turbulent non-mixing or is it laminar?

RE: Flow Regimes

Fog1, This is a direct quote from the Crane Technical Paper 410, "Flow of Fluids":

"For engineering purposes, flow in pipes is usually considered to be laminar if the Reynolds number is less than 2000, and turbulent if the Reynolds number is greater than 4000. Between these two values lies the "critical zone" where the flow ... being laminar, turbulent, or in the process of change (ie, transitional), depending upon many possible varying conditions is unpredictable. Careful experimentation has shown that the laminar zone may be made to terminate at Reynolds numbers as low as 1200 or extended as high 40,000, but these conditions are not expected to be realized in ordinary service."

If you're seeing a laminar flow at high Reynolds numbers, in all likelyhood you've got a special condition, outside of ordinary service.

As it normally goes in science, the exception proves the rule, or for every rule there is an exception.  

Hope this helps.
saxon

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources