×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

modification ideas

modification ideas

modification ideas

(OP)
I need ideas on how to modify a backfill design.  We already filled soil, and thought the retaining wall shouldn't be subjected such loads..We can't modify the retaining wall..What's the cheapest solution to eliminate the backfill load and maintain the same elevation?

RE: modification ideas

Please be a bit more detailed on your project descriptions.  How high is the wall?  What is the nature of the backfill?  What other wall geometry?  What measures did you/did you not include?  etc.

RE: modification ideas

(OP)
The backfill is standard drainage material, but the it's only 60cm higher than we want it..but there is no evidence of problems..but still we want to remove that 60cm load.  Remember, we are looking for a cheap alternative design or modification that doesn't modify or touch the retaining wall.

RE: modification ideas

You still haven't provided anything we can use to help you...

Please provide us with a detailed description of the site, the subsurface conditions, the fill specifications (grain size distribution, compaction type i.e. D698 or D1557, percent of optimum density requirement, etc.), wall type and design description, etc.

We're good - but we can't read minds.  If you want our help, you'll need to provide us with sufficient information.

Does this have anything to do with the "k-value" question?



Please see FAQ731-376  by VPL for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.

RE: modification ideas

I think you refer to use some kind of foam for the top 60 cm, with what you expect to get the same surcharge loads than in the project and good performance. Unfortunately foams are far more compressible than usual civil works and building structural materials. You may use arlite or other fills or concretes of low weight replacing more than the 60 cms to get a better result, yet use a good detail to not cause a problem where previously there is not one. For example, such slab might someday evolve towards a formidable strut pushing against your wall.

Do not forget to remake in any case the analysis for the projected situation.

RE: modification ideas

Is foamed concrete available/ an option?

RE: modification ideas

I think the biggest probelm here is what loads are you trying to reduce, what type of retainineg wall is it, where vertically is the 60 cm that need to be removed/ reduced?

This can greatly modify any advice that can be given.

Quickly, however, there is styro-foam backfill blocks that can be used to lower the overall load on the structure, however I don't suggest using these at the surface.  These should probably used shallow or along the face of the wall.

The other option may be as simple as tailing the backfill to 60 cm below the top of wall.

More detail on the problem ?!PLEASE?!

Keithe J. Merl

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources