×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Gas Chromatography Detector

Gas Chromatography Detector

Gas Chromatography Detector

(OP)
I would like to know some opinions on the following question :
1. When We should be used the following detector and what is the difference ?
- FID = Flame Ionization Detector
- TCD = Thermal Conductivity Detector
- FPD = Flame Photometric Detector
- FTD = Flame Thermionic Detector
- ECD = Electron Capture Detector

2. How to select the suitable carrier gas for Gas Chromatography ?

3. What is the difference between Correctected area method, absolute method and internal standard methode for gas chromatography ?

Best regards.

RE: Gas Chromatography Detector

I have some experience with FIDs, TCDs, and gas chromatographs. Also photo ionization detectors(PIDs). Most of them were designed for the natural gas industry.
The FIDs were mainly used in open environments for leak detection. They burned, within a closed cell, a mix of hydrogen and some inert gas, with a sample pump to bring in outside air through a probe/hose. Any hydrocarbons present in the sample would ionize as they burned, giving you an indication. They were fairly sensitive(accurate in the 10 PPM range), but would easily get contaminated with petroleum distillates.
 PIDs worked in a similar way, only the ionization of the sample would occur with ultraviolet light. Many of these models were intrinsically safe, allowing use in a confined environment. The disadvantage is that they had to be calibrated for the specific hydrocarbon you're looking for.

TCDs had a certain resistance, which changed according to whatever gas moved over it. I remember thinking (it's been 10 years) that they weren't too accurate, but no ionization occured so the sample remained unaltered.

The chromatographs I used were designed specifically for checking the composition and concentration of odorants in natural gas lines. They worked by forcing the gas through a permiable column, with the detector at the other end. The size of the molecule determined how long it took to pass over the detector. We knew the approx. time it took for methane to pass, thereby excluding it from our result "window". I'd suggest to you to select a carrier gas that won't overlap any of the molecules you want to monitor.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources