×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

ASME PWHT Requirements

ASME PWHT Requirements

ASME PWHT Requirements

(OP)
Can anyone tell me why an ASME Section I steam drum, P1 material, 1" thick requires PWHT and yet an ASME Section VIII, Div. 1 pressure vessel, built of the same 1" thick, P1 material using the same WPS, does not require PWHT?

RE: ASME PWHT Requirements

Did you compare for P4 material?

Yes there are differences amongst the different codes, these differences are largely due to different design Philosophy/design principles, if you check the allowable stress for a given material for a given temperature, you may get the essential difference.

If you check BS 5500(PD5500), appendix then you would realise if necessary impact test is carried out at design reference temp after necessary forming, and the values meet the requirement specified the PWHT could be waived. This kind of provision is not there inSec VIII div 1.

If you do a comparative study amongst various design standards you may find the required thickness for a given equipment would vary, if you get the reason for this you would also get the reason for your querry.

Did you check ANSI B 31.3 and compare the PWHT requirement with ASME?

RE: ASME PWHT Requirements

(OP)
Yes, ASME B31.3 is the same as ASME Section 1.  For P1 materials, PWHT is a requirement for base metals greater than 0.75".

Looking at ASME Section II, Part D for SA-516 70, there is no difference in the stress values for Section VIII, Div. 1 and Section I.  The only difference is in the MAWT.  Which still doesn't affect the PWHT requirements.

This is something which has puzzled me for years.

RE: ASME PWHT Requirements

PWHT for sec I power boilers is some how mandatory due to the process work/environment where the vessel and components are used, mostly fire, the commitee at at sec I
and sec VIII do not agree in having the same for both sections. They are different designs and that is why the PWHT on sec I will always be there.(some times even if it is not need for PWHT) you must comply with the Code.
Another: note that the explosive danger that the steam possesses makes the engineers at ASME keep it mandatory.
Same is for sec VIII Lethat vessels! Hope it helps.

ER





 

RE: ASME PWHT Requirements

(OP)
I don't mean to belabor the point and I do realize we have to comply with the requirements of the ASME Codes, but I'm trying to understand the rationale behind the requirements.  Most items in the ASME Codes are logical but this seems to be an exception.

In regards to the explosive power of steam, it shouldn't matter if the steam is generated in a Section I power boiler with a 1" thick carbon steel steam drum, or if the steam is generated in a Section VIII, Div. 1 unfired heat exchanger with a 1" thick carbon steel exchanger shell.

As for Section I being fired, wouldn't you almost think that a 1" thick carbon steel superheater header would pretty well stress relieve itself while it is in service, assuming it is in or near the gas flow?

Interesting stuff.


RE: ASME PWHT Requirements

There is no rationale in the design. the main thing is that sec viii commitee does not talk the same language with the sec I.
It may not make sense or it does not make sense at all but it is my belief that the word POWER BOILER is a stronger word than the only Pressure vessel. Fired boilers behave diferent as to unfired boilers.
Also look at NDE, sec I is more stringent as well, even if some times is not needed at all.
and yes it will PWHT at that hi-temp, but before that it will aneal as well and becomes brittle and crack, so PWHT will be needed befor putting in service.
I will have to take a look at the PV sec Viii to see about the NOT-needed PWHT for unfire systems on 1" thick vessel.
I was under the impression that if the vessel is for steam service it has to be PWHT.

I Hope it makes some sense.
ER
 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources